Brooking institute study says blacks consistently score lower on tests

Last edited by a moderator:
From the article:
"African Americans score lower than European Americans on vocabulary, reading, and math tests, as well as on tests that claim to measure scholastic aptitude and intelligence. The gap appears before children enter kindergarten and it persists into adulthood. It has narrowed since 1970, but the typical American black still scores below 75 percent of American whites on almost every standardized test.'

It's because as a race, blacks are WAY below whites and orientals in IQ. Hey, they have dark skin: why can't they have less intelligence? Well, they do: look at Africa. Look at Haiti, and any other black-majority sinkhole. Facts are facts.

We can never make any progress until we tell the truth. I know the truth about this problem is taboo, transgressive --- but it's true all the same. The reason people will NOT tell the truth when it stares us all in the face is that it is unfixable. You can't fix stupid. It would be like trying to "fix" black skin, but the Ethiopian can't change his skin, as the Bible says. So people try to pretend that it IS fixable, but since it isn't, we haven't succeeded.

I don't know how to fix this either, but I know lying about it hasn't worked.
 
I do not believe it.

Common knowledge that blacks on average are mentally inferior, which is obviously why you know nothing about it. Mind you, I'm not claiming it is heredity or environment because I don't know if anyone has dared try to sort that out in today's PC climate.

20060122_Multiracialists_are_Crazy,_Part_3_IQ_graph_racial.jpg
iq5.jpg

africa iq.jpg


Note that the countries of Africa marked in red above all mostly populate the lower end of the IQ rankings with Libya being the highest with an average IQ of 81.
 
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/t...t-can-be-done/

I wonder if this explains some of the poor behavior we see from this ethnic group when encountering police, flight attendants, and people in general.
It's probably true too because it's a matter of 'nurture' over 'nature'.
Do you know what that means or would it be something you would prefer to not know?
I'll help!
If it was 'nature' then that would mean that black people are born inferior to others.
If it's nurture then that would mean that factors such as opportunity were the reason. Can you think of some other reasons why it's clearly 'nurture' and not 'nature'?

(keeping in mind that we never talk about tarring any skin colour with the same exclusive brush.
 
Mind you, I'm not claiming it is heredity or environment because I don't know if anyone has dared try to sort that out in today's PC climate.
But you should know and you probably do!
But therein lies your racism problem in trying to claim that you don't know.

So lets set the record straight. It's environmental and there have been plenty of studies to prove it. Now you have no excuse for pretending to not know!
 
Mind you, I'm not claiming it is heredity or environment because I don't know if anyone has dared try to sort that out in today's PC climate.

Note that the countries of Africa marked in red above all mostly populate the lower end of the IQ rankings with Libya being the highest with an average IQ of 81.

You just did sort it out.

Lots and lots of different majority-black environments in both hemispheres, all doing incredibly badly on every measure. So it has to be heredity.
 
It's probably true too because it's a matter of 'nurture' over 'nature'.
Do you know what that means or would it be something you would prefer to not know?
I'll help!
If it was 'nature' then that would mean that black people are born inferior to others.
If it's nurture then that would mean that factors such as opportunity were the reason. Can you think of some other reasons why it's clearly 'nurture' and not 'nature'?

(keeping in mind that we never talk about tarring any skin colour with the same exclusive brush.
Hun, they do iq tests on infants...guess who scores the lowest even as infants.
 
Hun, they do iq tests on infants...guess who scores the lowest even as infants.
Do they do IQ scores on infants who aren't yet exposed to their environment? How would they do that?
Wouldn't THEY have to waist two or three months until the baby is capable of having an Intelligence quotient?
And then would the black baby that's been adopted by white parents score higher?

The whole thing is Turtlesoup, you haven't asked the questions and you're not interested in any answers, because you're a racist.

Let's pursue some answers that can prove you're not.
 
I guess I did. I was trying to be nice.


I cannot refute that logic.
It's expected that we would see 'you' promoting racism on this forum.

It's also expected that you would be ready to present some deniability.

Us libruls can't help but hook into it but I choose which ones I hook into! Only the ones that I am confident on being able to see it through.
 

Forum List

Back
Top