$25 to start plus full benefits seems fair and fair to the employer as well. Still not even decent pay in reality.How much do you believe a factory, unskilled worker should be making?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
$25 to start plus full benefits seems fair and fair to the employer as well. Still not even decent pay in reality.How much do you believe a factory, unskilled worker should be making?
The design of those plants are often held aboard especially in Europe.... That is where the actually best paying and most work goes one...
Europe is laughing their holes off at US asking for manafactueuring jobs... That is Red State idiot jobs, the Blue states want the much higher paid services jobs(and they ain't talking about restaraunts)...
Manufacturing is low skilled compared to the services jobs.... Some of these jobs China is not competing for, better to let off to Bangladesh where labour is real cheap...
Auto Manufacture , the best jobs are in design, regulation, IT, Testing, Marketing.... Manufacture is overseeing a robot doing lego...
Not bad....semi-skilled most likely. Lower wage depending on the position. Some guy in the parts department not going to see $25.$25 to start plus full benefits seems fair and fair to the employer as well. Still not even decent pay in reality.
Then nobody needs to do the parts job.Not bad....semi-skilled most likely. Lower wage depending on the position. Some guy in the parts department not going to see $25.
Robotics means far, far less jobs.Robotics are the freaking present but robotics still represent jobs for skilled middle class workers in spite of a Brit editorial.
This is EXACTLY why jobs were sent overseas or automated out of existence.$25 to start plus full benefits seems fair and fair to the employer as well. Still not even decent pay in reality.
You only show the final assembly, you don't show the engines and transmissions being built, nor all of the other parts needed for final assembly, or all of the steel and aluminum used being made, or even the robots and plants used being made.Robotics means far, far less jobs.
Automation deletes more jobs than it creates. That's why companies automate.
Here's an American auto factory from the 1970s. Look how many workers:
Here's an American auto factory today. See if you can find the humans:
How are Trump's tariffs on automobiles going to bring back those jobs?
Then you are against jobs that support families. I get that. But $17 per hour is not going to provide much of anything other than maybe a miserable means to live.This is EXACTLY why jobs were sent overseas or automated out of existence.
McKinsey: automation may wipe out 1/3 of America’s workforce by 2030
![]()
Just how retarded are you to draw such a conclusion?Then you are against jobs that support families.
I'm going to agree that bringing back jobs isn't the end all unless they pay big time more than the same product overseas. So in that aspect I fully agree.Just how retarded are you to draw such a conclusion?
What you don't get, and what I've been saying for YEARS, is that going to work in your daddy's factory is no longer viable. We need to train our children for the jobs of TOMORROW, not the jobs of YESTERDAY.
This persistent idiocy of clinging to manufacturing jobs as the answer to all our problems is ignorant in the extreme.
Look at the graphic I provided, fool. The US makes more stuff than ever before.
Trump won't tell you that. He hopes you don't find out that is a fact.
As I've pointed out countless times, 90 percent of America worked in agriculture at our nation's founding.
Today, only 2 percent work in agriculture and we produce more food than ever. We feed the world.
What would you make of a demagogue who promised to "bring back farm jobs"?
Would you be stupid enough to support that asshole?
Well, guess what. It's the same thing with Trump and manufacturing jobs.
Manufacturing is not where the money for workers is. Thai sgree t's gone. Kaput.
Most, and mean the vast majority, of manufacturing jobs that have been lost did NOT go overseas. They went EXTINCT because of automation.
Stop being stupid. Open your eyes.
Trump is a buffoon.
That type job won't demand that high a wage. I'd guess high teens with a decent bennies would fill under $20.Then nobody needs to do the parts job.
I'd just as soon see the position be unable to be filledThat type job won't demand that high a wage. I'd guess high teens with a decent bennies would fill under $20.
Instead of retooling our education system to train our kids for the jobs of tomorrow, the Republicans are trying to tear down our education system so our kids can be homeschooled to learn the Earth is only 6,000 years old and that vaccinations are bad.I'm going to agree that bringing back jobs isn't the end all unless they pay big time more than the same product overseas. So in that aspect I fully agree.
The earth is much older than 6000 years. That theory is for wackos.Instead of retooling our education system to train our kids for the jobs of tomorrow, the Republicans are trying to tear down our education system so our kids can be homeschooled to learn the Earth is only 6,000 years old and that vaccinations are bad.
You are forgetting the most important ingredient in it all, and that is the consumer. So where does these consumer's come from, otherwise if we don't promote and grow the consumer base ? Being hostile towards a vital consumer base is about is ridiculous as it gets.Yes, I understand that. From the perspective of today's technology, you can have such a factory that does not employ working class people (the people Trump wanted support from for this policy) but skilled workers, programmers and people who can fix the robots.
How many do you need per factory? The example given of the Dutch factory said 9 people. Obviously we don't know how many workers the factory would otherwise have employed, but probably a lot more than 9.
But we're entering the phase of AI, where AI will be able to do most of that programming itself. Then they might also have robots that can fix the robots. So, skilled workers will be less in demand as you'd need only to employ a company that hires out such people when it becomes an issue.
Loading containers, I'm sure that's something that will be mostly AI in the future.
Dockworkers, however, require things to be imported and exported. Tariffs reduce the amount of import and export. So, you'd expect the number of dockworkers to go DOWN.
Seems to me that would be up to the prospective employees decision…But, see what you’re doing here? You’re setting the bar unreasonably high, and making it so that the factory can’t compete against similar makers of a said product unless they pay those kinds of wages as well.$25 to start plus full benefits seems fair and fair to the employer as well. Still not even decent pay in reality.
Disagree. You want americans doing those jobs then PAY them. And don't be cheap about it. $25 per hour doesn't amount to much of anything. Don't go there.Seems to me that would be up to the prospective employees decision…But, see what you’re doing here? You’re setting the bar unreasonably high, and making it so that the factory can’t compete against similar makers of a said product unless they pay those kinds of wages as well.
Where’d you come Up with $25 hr. anyway? That’s 3.5 times the avg minimum wage in the country…