.
.
See: Bridgeport primary election: Ganim, Gomes camps pick new date
From the article:
Let us keep in mind, when these mail-in ballots are counted, it will not be known if the one who filled out the ballot and sent it in, is the person whose name appears on the ballot, or if the choices on the ballot were knowingly and willingly made by that person, and without undue influence.
In-person voting eliminates many of the creative ways cheaters have come up with to steal the votes of others. And that is one exceptionally good reason for limiting mail-in voting, e.g., to ". . . qualified electors who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the municipality of their residence, because their duties, occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their proper polling places because of illness or physical disability or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election day duties . . . " See PA's Constitution, ARTICLE VII, ELECTIONS, § 14. Absentee Voting, which I might add, Pennslyvania's Democrat controlled Supreme Court recently subjugated, and without the people's consent, arbitrarily invoked no-excuse, mail-in voting.
If this push for no-excuse mail-in ballot voting, which is being forced on the people by the Democrat Party Leadership, is not nipped in the bud and stopped in its tracks, voting in our national elections will in fact resemble those as happen in China, Cuba, and Russia, where there is one party rule.
Forewarned is forearmed.
.
JWK
The scary truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.
.
See: Bridgeport primary election: Ganim, Gomes camps pick new date
From the article:
The article goes on to note that “. . . someone came into the town clerk’s office on Tuesday and took out 200 applications. Those will no longer be usable.”
Let us keep in mind, when these mail-in ballots are counted, it will not be known if the one who filled out the ballot and sent it in, is the person whose name appears on the ballot, or if the choices on the ballot were knowingly and willingly made by that person, and without undue influence.
In-person voting eliminates many of the creative ways cheaters have come up with to steal the votes of others. And that is one exceptionally good reason for limiting mail-in voting, e.g., to ". . . qualified electors who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the municipality of their residence, because their duties, occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their proper polling places because of illness or physical disability or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election day duties . . . " See PA's Constitution, ARTICLE VII, ELECTIONS, § 14. Absentee Voting, which I might add, Pennslyvania's Democrat controlled Supreme Court recently subjugated, and without the people's consent, arbitrarily invoked no-excuse, mail-in voting.
If this push for no-excuse mail-in ballot voting, which is being forced on the people by the Democrat Party Leadership, is not nipped in the bud and stopped in its tracks, voting in our national elections will in fact resemble those as happen in China, Cuba, and Russia, where there is one party rule.
Forewarned is forearmed.
.
JWK
The scary truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.
