Brian Auten: FBI offered Christopher Steele $1million if he could corroborate allegations in the Dossier, but Steele could not do so.

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
109,396
Reaction score
27,174
Points
2,220
Who offered the $1 million?...there you go, folks. witch hunt! Trump has been vindicated over and over

 
Who offered the $1 million?...there you go, folks. witch hunt! Trump has been vindicated over and over


What are you talking about. Trump won the 2016 election and held the office 4 years, until he was voted out. Where have you been?
 
What are you talking about. Trump won the 2016 election and held the office 4 years, until he was voted out. Where have you been?

The fucktards knew it was fake from the git-go.

There you have it

WITCH HUNT

Deliberate engagement in the politics of personal destruction.

Hillary Clinton's head should roll for this.

Talk about meddling. Talk about election interference. Talk about underhandedness and dirty tricks and scumbag politics.

She hired a FOREIGN ******* SPY, for crying out loud. Hello? National security? Classified information?

I don't ever want to hear you fucktards talking about the evil Donald again. Donald is the VICTIM in all this, NOT the perpetrator
 
Steele was a foreign agent who might have had ties to China or Russia. The mainstream media was only interested in undermining a sitting president and wasn't interested in investigating the relationship between Steele and the FBI.
 
The fucktards knew it was fake from the git-go.

There you have it

WITCH HUNT

Deliberate engagement in the politics of personal destruction.

Hillary Clinton's head should roll for this.

Talk about meddling. Talk about election interference. Talk about underhandedness and dirty tricks and scumbag politics.

She hired a FOREIGN ******* SPY, for crying out loud. Hello? National security? Classified information?

I don't ever want to hear you fucktards talking about the evil Donald again. Donald is the VICTIM in all this, NOT the perpetrator
Your point, regarding it is what, exactly? I mean, what does that have to do with 2022. Nothing? That is what I think. What is it, that keeps it praying on your mind?
 
Last edited:
Strange you guys never mentioned this before.... LOL
From the OP

"according to new court testimony"

That means the person testifying is sworn and knowingly being dishonest would be perjury, subject to fine and imprisonment of up to five years.

Regards,
Jim
 
The bribe proves they lied on the fisa request
No bribe. They often pay for information. They DIDN'T pay for the Steele Report because they couldn't verify it.

They included it in the FISA requests with the caveat that it wasn't verified
 
15th post
No bribe. They often pay for information. They DIDN'T pay for the Steele Report because they couldn't verify it.

They included it in the FISA requests with the caveat that it wasn't verified
You are a liar. They lied to the FISA courts.

You can't submit anything to them without certifying under oath the information you present to them HAS BEEN VERIFIED.
 
Your point, regarding it is what, exactly? I mean, what does that have to do with 2022. Nothing? That is what I think. What is it, that keeps it praying on your mind?
My mind is a highly trained security machine. It's trained to think like a perp. If I was a perp I'd be all over this one.

There is no evidence that 2020 was a one-off.
 
You are a liar. They lied to the FISA courts.
As I said..they included that report with caveats
You can't submit anything to them without certifying under oath the information you present to them HAS BEEN VERIFIED.
Who told you that? Suspicions are often included in those applications
 
As I said..they included that report with caveats

Who told you that? Suspicions are often included in those applications
LInk us up to these "caveats".

I predict we will never see these so-called "caveats".
 
Back
Top Bottom