Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota

But you voted for Trump, who is an adjudicated rapist.

Nope.Liar

If a neighborhood, city, or state has decided that they want to welcome immigrants, ICE needs to stay the **** out.

Period.
Why does it not surprise us that you would celebrate your next door neighbor housing convicted illegal pedophiles in their basement.
 
the fact that some racist parts of the country are fine with rounding up people is nothing to be proud of.
Delusional and ridiculous.

Once again Democrats are mad about losing their slaves.


 
IMG_2279.webp
 
Obviously you don't take yourself seriously or you wouldn't have been playing games all this time with myself and others.

One thing you've done quite well at is takening hypocrisy to a new level.

Uneasy rider?

Whatever you need to tell yourself.
 
She created the situation by panicking and trying to escape. In fact, she created the situation by stopping her vehicle crossways in the street to impede their operation.
We get it man, you hate the race traitors preventing ICE from making America all white.

Then again, you've justified the cops shooting jaywalkers.

The key term here is ESCALATION. When dealing with the public, LEOs should not ESCALATE tensions, they need to bring them down a notch.

This is something the Mall Cop rejects of ICE don't seem to get.
 
We get it man, you hate the race traitors preventing ICE from making America all white.

Then again, you've justified the cops shooting jaywalkers.

The key term here is ESCALATION. When dealing with the public, LEOs should not ESCALATE tensions, they need to bring them down a notch.

This is something the Mall Cop rejects of ICE don't seem to get.

You mad bro, that your scheme to flood the country with your third-worlders has consequences?
 
You mad bro, that your scheme to flood the country with your third-worlders has consequences?

Actually, people are already turning against the "consequences", as we are seeing in MN.

They shot a mom with a glovebox full of toys and a dog in the back seat.

She wasn't a "Third-Worlder" (not that would make this any better.)
 
Your argument is based on what actually happened but as they say, hindsight is 20/20. There is also what conceivably could have happened. That is why I say she was dangerous.
That the strike on the officer was a glancing blow was due strictly to luck and circumstances, not necessarily because of any restraint or clear thinking on her part. It could have turned out with a dead officer or pedestrian instead of the other way around.

But we don't know and we can't know and that's the clincher: the unknown. The unknown is the prime mover of choices and actions in situations like this, especially when things are happening as fast as they did.
Did the officer know it would only be a glancing blow? No. Did he know she would or would not accidently strike someone else in her haste to escape? No. For that matter, did she know the officer would fire or how they would react? No. For that reason she should have put the van in park and got out of the vehicle as ordered. Instead, she chose to escalate things further by attempting to escape and evading arrest.

Who committed the action that necessitated a reaction? She did.

You might have a point but I will say two things:

1.) She was coming right at him. That's how he got struck. It doesn't even matter if he didn't fire his weapon; he would have been hit in any case.

2.) If he had shot her through the windshield, people would still be outraged and you would likely still be assessing his actions as unprofessional. Outrage is what placed her there in the first place so for the officers, no matter how this turned out, it was a lose-lose situation.

I'm very big on personal accountability for choices and that's why I have no sympathy for this woman. She made her choice and suffered the consequences just as illegal immigrants made their choice to come here illegally and are suffering the consequences of that which outraged her in the first place.
A “glancing blow” sounds like a good way of putting it. I can agree with that.

I previously stated that I think it would have been impossible for her to accidentally kill the officer from that distance and that angle, from a complete stop. While a lot of things could have happened there, I don’t think an accidental police officer death is in the realm of possibilities. What did happen is a police officer killed someone that really didn’t need to be killed. To me, that’s the dangerous one here.

As I said, I wasn’t expecting us to see eye-to-eye on this. There’s some we agree on, and other stuff we don’t agree. Good talking to you about it though. I’m content leaving it there unless you have something further that sparks your interest.
 
Actually, people are already turning against the "consequences", as we are seeing in MN.

They shot a mom with a glovebox full of toys and a dog in the back seat.

She wasn't a "Third-Worlder" (not that would make this any better.)

They are "turning against the consequences" because of the chaos and violence created by the very people who are now turning against it. If you people weren't in the streets constantly getting violent and creating the chaos, our agents would be able to go after illegals, and it would be accomplished with little fanfare.
 
They are "turning against the consequences" because of the chaos and violence created by the very people who are now turning against it. If you people weren't in the streets constantly getting violent and creating the chaos, our agents would be able to go after illegals, and it would be accomplished with little fanfare.

Maybe there should be fanfare.

Maybe some of us don't think our neighbors should be rounded up because they lack paperwork.

If you were sending ICE after actual rapists and drug dealers, I would be happily cheering them on.

But I can't get worked up over maids and gardeners.
 
Actually, people are already turning against the "consequences", as we are seeing in MN.

They shot a mom with a glovebox full of toys and a dog in the back seat.

She wasn't a "Third-Worlder" (not that would make this any better.)

Stupidity hurts.

Sometimes, it's fatal.
 
15th post
Maybe there should be fanfare.

Maybe some of us don't think our neighbors should be rounded up because they lack paperwork.

If you were sending ICE after actual rapists and drug dealers, I would be happily cheering them on.

But I can't get worked up over maids and gardeners.
How about gardeners that are rapists?
 
But you voted for Trump, who is an adjudicated rapist.
Falsely adjudicated rapist.
If a neighborhood, city, or state has decided that they want to welcome immigrants, ICE needs to stay the **** out.

Period.
Immigration is a federal matter. You spent the last four years telling Texas and Arizona that states have no say whatsoever in immigration policy.
They certainly shouldn't be shooting suburban moms because they were reporting their activities.
They shot her because she ran her car into an agent.
 
We get it man, you hate the race traitors preventing ICE from making America all white.

Then again, you've justified the cops shooting jaywalkers.

The key term here is ESCALATION. When dealing with the public, LEOs should not ESCALATE tensions, they need to bring them down a notch.

This is something the Mall Cop rejects of ICE don't seem to get.
I don't hate anyone. Try it sometime. Hate is a drug.
 
the fact that some racist parts of the country are fine with rounding up people is nothing to be proud of.
Rounding up criminal lawbreakers the Dems planned on using to gain an unbeatable majority to create a permanent one party dictatorship?

No, they are rounding up people of color for shits and grins.
All criminals.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom