QuickHitCurepon
Diamond Member
Maybe, he has PTSD.He is a 10 year veteran shit for brains!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe, he has PTSD.He is a 10 year veteran shit for brains!
BRAKES.He had time after being rammed by her car to unholster his firearm point it at her and pull the trigger. She had ample time to hit the breaks.
And of course she stomped on the gas before she got shot. Her wife told her to "Drive baby, drive," and she did.You would stomp on the gas too if you had just been shot.
Yes “brakes”. A spelling error doesn’t support your argument. If he had time to unholster his weapon, point it at her and pull the trigger, then she had ample time to simply hit the BRAKES.BRAKES.
If he had time to unholster his weapon, point it at her and pull the trigger, then HE had ample time to simply get out of the way.If he had time to unholster his weapon, point it at her and pull the trigger, then she had ample time to simply hit the BRAKES.
Is it your contention she at no point hit him with the car?He had plenty of time to move out of the way while she backed up.
NoIs it your contention she at no point hit him with the car?
Then he had the right to use deadly force.
NoThen he had the right to use deadly force.
BRAKESIf anything, that’s just “indisputable proof” she was a negligent driver. No looking where you are going isn’t a real defense for hitting a pedestrian.
That fact she kept driving forward and never hit the breaks is indisputable proof that it wasn’t an innocent mistake.
Before he did any of that, she had already struck him with there vehicle and continued to be a threat by NOT STOPPING.If he had time to unholster his weapon, point it at her and pull the trigger, then HE had ample time to simply get out of the way.
Never said she didnt.Yes “brakes”. A spelling error doesn’t support your argument. If he had time to unholster his weapon, point it at her and pull the trigger, then she had ample time to simply hit the BRAKES.
He fired exactly when he was hit, so she couldn't have possibly hit the brakes with gunshot wounds.A normal response to hitting someone with your car is to immediately hit the brakes. She didn’t because she intended to hit him.
If she shot at him but only grazed his arm should he have moved to cover instead of using deadly force in return ?
He had time after being rammed by her car to unholster his firearm point it at her and pull the trigger. She had ample time to hit the breaks.
More people are going to die, it’s a self perpetuating delusion of persecution.