BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...

Status
Not open for further replies.

In a letter released yesterday, 452 civil society groups – unions, movements, political parties and organizations – from tens of countries around the world called on the United Nations General Assembly and its Member States, currently meeting in New York, to investigate Israeli apartheid and to impose targeted sanctions to stop Israeli apartheid and illegal annexation of Palestinian land.

The letter marks the launch of a global public campaign calling on the UN to assume its responsibility for the investigation and eradication of Israel’s apartheid regime, similar to the role it had played in ending apartheid in Southern Africa.

The global letter cites “the mounting recognition of Israel’s maintenance of an apartheid regime over the Palestinian people.” It notes that 47 independent human rights experts within the United Nations stated that the Israeli government plans to illegally annex large parts of the occupied West Bank would constitute “a vision of a 21st-century apartheid.”
 

In a letter released yesterday, 452 civil society groups – unions, movements, political parties and organizations – from tens of countries around the world called on the United Nations General Assembly and its Member States, currently meeting in New York, to investigate Israeli apartheid and to impose targeted sanctions to stop Israeli apartheid and illegal annexation of Palestinian land.

The letter marks the launch of a global public campaign calling on the UN to assume its responsibility for the investigation and eradication of Israel’s apartheid regime, similar to the role it had played in ending apartheid in Southern Africa.

The global letter cites “the mounting recognition of Israel’s maintenance of an apartheid regime over the Palestinian people.” It notes that 47 independent human rights experts within the United Nations stated that the Israeli government plans to illegally annex large parts of the occupied West Bank would constitute “a vision of a 21st-century apartheid.”


Blah, blah, blah.

Why do you want to encourage the Palestinians to keep starting fights they keep losing? How many of them are you willing to see die, to destroy Israel?
 

In a letter released yesterday, 452 civil society groups – unions, movements, political parties and organizations – from tens of countries around the world called on the United Nations General Assembly and its Member States, currently meeting in New York, to investigate Israeli apartheid and to impose targeted sanctions to stop Israeli apartheid and illegal annexation of Palestinian land.

The letter marks the launch of a global public campaign calling on the UN to assume its responsibility for the investigation and eradication of Israel’s apartheid regime, similar to the role it had played in ending apartheid in Southern Africa.

The global letter cites “the mounting recognition of Israel’s maintenance of an apartheid regime over the Palestinian people.” It notes that 47 independent human rights experts within the United Nations stated that the Israeli government plans to illegally annex large parts of the occupied West Bank would constitute “a vision of a 21st-century apartheid.”


Blah, blah, blah.

Why do you want to encourage the Palestinians to keep starting fights they keep losing? How many of them are you willing to see die, to destroy Israel?
Losing? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
 

In a letter released yesterday, 452 civil society groups – unions, movements, political parties and organizations – from tens of countries around the world called on the United Nations General Assembly and its Member States, currently meeting in New York, to investigate Israeli apartheid and to impose targeted sanctions to stop Israeli apartheid and illegal annexation of Palestinian land.

The letter marks the launch of a global public campaign calling on the UN to assume its responsibility for the investigation and eradication of Israel’s apartheid regime, similar to the role it had played in ending apartheid in Southern Africa.

The global letter cites “the mounting recognition of Israel’s maintenance of an apartheid regime over the Palestinian people.” It notes that 47 independent human rights experts within the United Nations stated that the Israeli government plans to illegally annex large parts of the occupied West Bank would constitute “a vision of a 21st-century apartheid.”


Blah, blah, blah.

Why do you want to encourage the Palestinians to keep starting fights they keep losing? How many of them are you willing to see die, to destroy Israel?
Losing? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:


Yes, losing, dying in large numbers accomplishing nothing but getting their home bombed.
 

In a letter released yesterday, 452 civil society groups – unions, movements, political parties and organizations – from tens of countries around the world called on the United Nations General Assembly and its Member States, currently meeting in New York, to investigate Israeli apartheid and to impose targeted sanctions to stop Israeli apartheid and illegal annexation of Palestinian land.

The letter marks the launch of a global public campaign calling on the UN to assume its responsibility for the investigation and eradication of Israel’s apartheid regime, similar to the role it had played in ending apartheid in Southern Africa.

The global letter cites “the mounting recognition of Israel’s maintenance of an apartheid regime over the Palestinian people.” It notes that 47 independent human rights experts within the United Nations stated that the Israeli government plans to illegally annex large parts of the occupied West Bank would constitute “a vision of a 21st-century apartheid.”

Gee whiz. Decades of islamo-whining and using the phony ''apartheid'' slogan has been reduced to a letter to the UN.

It's not too late to wheel out Richard Falk and the phony ECSWA report. That has only been cut and pasted a dozen or so times so why hesitate to waste some more bandwidth?
 

In a letter released yesterday, 452 civil society groups – unions, movements, political parties and organizations – from tens of countries around the world called on the United Nations General Assembly and its Member States, currently meeting in New York, to investigate Israeli apartheid and to impose targeted sanctions to stop Israeli apartheid and illegal annexation of Palestinian land.

The letter marks the launch of a global public campaign calling on the UN to assume its responsibility for the investigation and eradication of Israel’s apartheid regime, similar to the role it had played in ending apartheid in Southern Africa.

The global letter cites “the mounting recognition of Israel’s maintenance of an apartheid regime over the Palestinian people.” It notes that 47 independent human rights experts within the United Nations stated that the Israeli government plans to illegally annex large parts of the occupied West Bank would constitute “a vision of a 21st-century apartheid.”


Blah, blah, blah.

Why do you want to encourage the Palestinians to keep starting fights they keep losing? How many of them are you willing to see die, to destroy Israel?
Losing? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:


Yes, losing, dying in large numbers accomplishing nothing but getting their home bombed.
nothing but getting their home bombed.
That is Israel's crime, not theirs.
 

In a letter released yesterday, 452 civil society groups – unions, movements, political parties and organizations – from tens of countries around the world called on the United Nations General Assembly and its Member States, currently meeting in New York, to investigate Israeli apartheid and to impose targeted sanctions to stop Israeli apartheid and illegal annexation of Palestinian land.

The letter marks the launch of a global public campaign calling on the UN to assume its responsibility for the investigation and eradication of Israel’s apartheid regime, similar to the role it had played in ending apartheid in Southern Africa.

The global letter cites “the mounting recognition of Israel’s maintenance of an apartheid regime over the Palestinian people.” It notes that 47 independent human rights experts within the United Nations stated that the Israeli government plans to illegally annex large parts of the occupied West Bank would constitute “a vision of a 21st-century apartheid.”


Blah, blah, blah.

Why do you want to encourage the Palestinians to keep starting fights they keep losing? How many of them are you willing to see die, to destroy Israel?
Losing? :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:


Yes, losing, dying in large numbers accomplishing nothing but getting their home bombed.
nothing but getting their home bombed.
That is Israel's crime, not theirs.
Israel responding to acts of war perpetrated by Islamic terrorists is not a crime.
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Once again you support a view which you cannot define. And in this segment, you posted a video that shows just how desperate the Arab Palestinians are to drive a wedge between Israel and America. But, as in the title of the discussion, you cannot demonstrate how Israel violates any international law pertaining to "Apartheid."

PIPD Docs: Blank Check — How U.S. tax money funds apartheid against Palestinians
(COMMENT)

Get off the dime. Give me a citation to which law is actually being broken by Israel relative to the Crime of Apartheid... I just don't think you can do it.

I would also like to know the name of a country
(any country) that says that they do not have the "right" to defend their own sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Over the last couple of weeks, I have asked you to defend your commentary on the allegation of "Apartheid." You have not once, stepped up to the plate...

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
BLUF: Once again you support a view which you cannot define. And in this segment, you posted a video that shows just how desperate the Arab Palestinians are to drive a wedge between Israel and America. But, as in the title of the discussion, you cannot demonstrate how Israel violates any international law pertaining to "Apartheid."
This is the most comprehensive critique of Israeli apartheid that I have seen. She covers all of the issues and arguments. If there are any issues that you disagree with, bring them up for discussion. (No data dumps please.)

 
BLUF: Once again you support a view which you cannot define. And in this segment, you posted a video that shows just how desperate the Arab Palestinians are to drive a wedge between Israel and America. But, as in the title of the discussion, you cannot demonstrate how Israel violates any international law pertaining to "Apartheid."
This is the most comprehensive critique of Israeli apartheid that I have seen. She covers all of the issues and arguments. If there are any issues that you disagree with, bring them up for discussion. (No data dumps please.)
It’s only comprehensive in the sense that it just reiterates a lot of tired, out of context slogans.

It’s just another YouTube video that that you repetitively cut and paste.
 
BLUF: Once again you support a view which you cannot define. And in this segment, you posted a video that shows just how desperate the Arab Palestinians are to drive a wedge between Israel and America. But, as in the title of the discussion, you cannot demonstrate how Israel violates any international law pertaining to "Apartheid."
This is the most comprehensive critique of Israeli apartheid that I have seen. She covers all of the issues and arguments. If there are any issues that you disagree with, bring them up for discussion. (No data dumps please.)
It’s only comprehensive in the sense that it just reiterates a lot of tired, out of context slogans.

It’s just another YouTube video that that you repetitively cut and paste.
Don't want to refute any issues, huh?
 
RE: BREAKING: The UN concludes that Israel has established an APARTHEID REGIME...
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Yes and right off the bat, the lecture by Dr Virginia Tilley mis-diagnoses the conflict. And the mis-diagnosis of "Apartheid" leads to the simplification that a "Two State Solution" the 1920's concept of a "Jewish State" and a "Arab State" (hashed and re-hashed) dominated the recommendation and adoption in 1947 of a "Two State Solution" leads to "Apartheid."

BLUF: Once again you support a view which you cannot define. And in this segment, you posted a video that shows just how desperate the Arab Palestinians are to drive a wedge between Israel and America. But, as in the title of the discussion, you cannot demonstrate how Israel violates any international law pertaining to "Apartheid."
This is the most comprehensive critique of Israeli apartheid that I have seen. She covers all of the issues and arguments. If there are any issues that you disagree with, bring them up for discussion.
(COMMENT)

If you adopt a "Two-State Solution" ⁜→ you are, in essence, adopting the idea that there would be, as an outcome, two sovereign states with individual territorial integrity. The West Bank as one territorial entity, and Israel as a separate territorial entity. This is no more of an "Apartheid condition" than the "Canadian - US"
(result to the Border War) → Two-State Solution or the "US-Mexico" (result to the Mexican-American War) → Two-State Solution. In fact, any border you can identify in the Middle East is a "two-state solution." To think of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in a way, where you try to convince the outside observer that there can only be one answer - that being - a "Single State Solution" is ridiculous.

The second thing that must be remembered is that, at this current point along the political time-line, the forced adoption of a "Single-State Solution" would cause a Civil War of an unprecedented proportion and with a magnitude in deaths that would rival the holocaust.

The third thing to remember is that Israel is ranked the highest on the Human Development Index of any Arab Nation in the Middle East North Africa Region, as well as the Gulf States. If anyone, even Professor Tilley, thinks for one moment that the Arab Palestinians would have achieved such a status, given control under a Single-State Solution, is simply divorced of gray-cell matter.

Lastly, the Arab Palestinians were originally occupied by the Arab League and NOT the Israelis. That is how the vast majority of the Arab Palestinians either had a national identity with the Jordanians or the Egyptians. The West Bank was abandoned by the Jordanians and stripped the Arab Palestinians of their citizenship. If there is a case of Apartheid, then that action is surely worthy of examination.

(OBSERVATION)

It is not likely that the Israelis are likely to give up their territory without a fight to the death. Thoughout history, one group of nations, or another, has persecuted the Jewish People, from time-to-time. This latest outrage is not unexpected, but on the contrary, very much expected. The Israelis know, that except for a very few number of allies, most of the nations of the world cannot be counted upon to support their cause of action or to allow the Jewish National Home any support. In particular, the 50+ countries of the British Commonwealth of Nations were not supporting the cause in 1948, they were not supportive in the defense against the Arab League preparations in the Six-Day War, and they did not come to Israelis aid in 1973 when the Arab League launched a Surprize Attack on Yom Kipper. Among those in the undependable Commonwealth is "Canada." - It is of little wonder that Canada is the site of the symposium of the video.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
BLUF: Once again you support a view which you cannot define. And in this segment, you posted a video that shows just how desperate the Arab Palestinians are to drive a wedge between Israel and America. But, as in the title of the discussion, you cannot demonstrate how Israel violates any international law pertaining to "Apartheid."
This is the most comprehensive critique of Israeli apartheid that I have seen. She covers all of the issues and arguments. If there are any issues that you disagree with, bring them up for discussion. (No data dumps please.)
It’s only comprehensive in the sense that it just reiterates a lot of tired, out of context slogans.

It’s just another YouTube video that that you repetitively cut and paste.
Don't want to refute any issues, huh?
What issues?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top