Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 27,074
- 12,724
- 973
Trump believes he can take whatever classified government documents he wants and do whatever he wants with them whenever he feels like it.
And he’s not an authoritarian?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
BREAKING! The Florida Grand Jury Was Never Told About 'The Presidential Records Act' Or The 'Clinton Socks Case', Both Exonerating!
- Thread starter MAGA Macho Man
- Start date
And he’s not an authoritarian?
It's getting really tiresome listening to tards who have not read the indictment parrot propaganda.
Especially propaganda by the criminal himself.
This is willful blindness, not reading the indictment.
Go fuck yourself, fascist. Trump did nothing illegal.
He did the EXACT same thing that every POTUS has done before.
Hillary and Joe, though, they DID commit crimes....LOTS of them, and you assholes don't care.
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
Trump knows Clinton is innocent. What he tells you creduloids in public is vastly different than what he says in private.Because Trump isn't an authoritarian, like you all claimed he was.
All the more reason you idiots should read the indictment so you stop sounding like idiots.
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
Another tard demonstrates he has not read the indictment.Go fuck yourself, fascist. Trump did nothing illegal.
He did the EXACT same thing that every POTUS has done before.
Hillary and Joe, though, they DID commit crimes....LOTS of them, and you assholes don't care.
Willful blindness suits you.
Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 16,842
- 18,604
- 2,288
You claim to have read it and still sound like an idiot. Telling, that.All the more reason you idiots should read the indictment so you stop sounding like idiots.
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
The truth sounds like lunacy to a brainwashed cult member like yourself.You claim to have read it and still sound like an idiot. Telling, that.
This is a well-known phenomenon, which is why bringing cult members back to sanity is called "deprogramming".
Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 16,842
- 18,604
- 2,288
When all else fails, claim the person who embarrassed your dumb ass is in a cult.The truth sounds like lunacy to a brainwashed cult member like yourself.
This is a well-known phenomenon, which is why bringing cult members back to sanity is called "deprogramming".
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 33,254
- 21,752
- 1,845
Well what do you know!!!
Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.
Truth Social
Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.truthsocial.com
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!
That is how grand juries work.
Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 13,886
- 5,341
- 208
Ahh, hear it is.Well what do you know!!!
Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.
Truth Social
Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!
MAGA MMs bombshell of the day.
You didn't use gateway pundit this time but instead used truth social ROFL as your source.
So Trump is your source that proves Trump is innocent.
Anyhow "truth" social lied again. Trump doesn't get to unilaterally determine what is his and what isn't. It's sad you would even be stupid enough to believe that. What would be the point of the presidential records act of the president could simply determine everything is his.
Hello, Biff. Anyone home?
"The PRA distinguishes Presidential records from “personal records,” defining personal records as “all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.”
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
I will take the time to unpack Trump's sock drawer hoax.
You see, kids, Bill Clinton gave an interview to a historian while he was President.
When he left office, Clinton considered the tapes of that interview to be his personal property and kept it for himself. He supposedly kept the tapes in his sock drawer.
Judicial Watch sued Clinton, claiming the tape was government property, and therefore under the Presidential Records Act (which obviously none of you have read) dictates that the tapes belonged to the National Archives.
The courts ruled against Judicial Watch, deeming the tapes to be Clinton's personal property, and Clinton was allowed to keep the tapes in his sock drawer or up an intern's twat for all they cared.
Judicial Watch is still ass-burned over that ruling and they are now ironically claiming that case is proof Trump has done no wrong.
Trump is now parroting that hoax, and so are you as members of his loyal unquestioning ignorant cult.
But you have to have smoked a truckload of cocaine and hit yourself on the head with a hammer until you acquire seven pounds of brain damage to bleev our nuclear defense documents, which Trump stole and had to have forcibly removed from him, are his personal property.
Okay. You SHOULD be all caught up now. But I know your automatic cult defense shields in your pointy heads kept you from absorbing any of this.
Oh, well. Nothing I can do about that.
You see, kids, Bill Clinton gave an interview to a historian while he was President.
When he left office, Clinton considered the tapes of that interview to be his personal property and kept it for himself. He supposedly kept the tapes in his sock drawer.
Judicial Watch sued Clinton, claiming the tape was government property, and therefore under the Presidential Records Act (which obviously none of you have read) dictates that the tapes belonged to the National Archives.
The courts ruled against Judicial Watch, deeming the tapes to be Clinton's personal property, and Clinton was allowed to keep the tapes in his sock drawer or up an intern's twat for all they cared.
Judicial Watch is still ass-burned over that ruling and they are now ironically claiming that case is proof Trump has done no wrong.
Trump is now parroting that hoax, and so are you as members of his loyal unquestioning ignorant cult.
But you have to have smoked a truckload of cocaine and hit yourself on the head with a hammer until you acquire seven pounds of brain damage to bleev our nuclear defense documents, which Trump stole and had to have forcibly removed from him, are his personal property.
Okay. You SHOULD be all caught up now. But I know your automatic cult defense shields in your pointy heads kept you from absorbing any of this.
Oh, well. Nothing I can do about that.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 33,254
- 21,752
- 1,845
Grand Juries don’t necessarily have to be fully informed on all possibly relevant law.
It suffices that a trial jury may be expressed to hear of these things.
Prosecutors will never provide info that does not help their case.
They put on an infomercial for the grand jury
- Banned
- #92
There is NEVER a defense presented to a Grand Jury. That's why indictments are easy to get.Well what do you know!!!
Corrupt Jack Smith got an indictment against Trump taking advantage of the jurors ignorance pertaining to presidential records when a president leaves office. That's okay! Judge Eileen Cannon will see the treachery in this.
Truth Social
Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 33,254
- 21,752
- 1,845
This.
It is why you can "indict a ham sandwich"
And yet the idiotic liberals dance
I've been trying for 2 days to get them to explain what an indictment is.
They cant.
Trump knows Clinton is innocent. What he tells you creduloids in public is vastly different than what he says in private.
All the more reason you idiots should read the indictment so you stop sounding like idiots.
Bullshit. Comey laid out multiple felonies that the bitch committed then said no one would prosecute her.
DURRRRRR
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
Trump believes Clinton is innocent.Bullshit. Comey laid out multiple felonies that the bitch committed then said no one would prosecute her.
DURRRRRR
You REALLY should Read. The. Indictment.
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
No one has embarrassed me. I am, however, embarrassed for you.When all else fails, claim the person who embarrassed your dumb ass is in a cult.
It's sad to see all of you devolve to such a low state of cognizance.
Trump believes Clinton is innocent.
You REALLY should Read. The. Indictment.
No, he doesn't. We ALL know she committed crimes you blithering buffoon.
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
Willful blindness, the refusal to read the indictment.
It's hard to parrot hoaxes after you've read the facts of the case.
That's why they don't read it. They must bleev Trump is being unfairly treated. The idea Trump is an actual over-the-top criminal is just too abhorrent to think about.
Sad.
It's hard to parrot hoaxes after you've read the facts of the case.
That's why they don't read it. They must bleev Trump is being unfairly treated. The idea Trump is an actual over-the-top criminal is just too abhorrent to think about.
Sad.
- Nov 26, 2011
- 124,164
- 60,774
- 2,290
Like I said. What he tells you rubes and what he actually believes are two different things.No, he doesn't. We ALL know she committed crimes you blithering buffoon.
This is why you won't read the indictment. There are truths in there which would smash your ridiculous delusions and you can't take it.
Willful blindness, the refusal to read the indictment.
It's hard to parrot hoaxes after you've read the facts of the case.
That's why they don't read it. They must bleev Trump is being unfairly treated. The idea Trump is an actual over-the-top criminal is just too abhorrent to think about.
Sad.
Yes, you are a sad little fascist, whining that no one believes a fascist prick and his bullshit charges.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 253
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 70
- Views
- 893
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 410
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 66
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 72
- Views
- 147
- Poll
- Replies
- 42
- Views
- 201
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8170
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 475
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-