BREAKING NEWS: Federal Judge grants stay on Trump's Muslim ban

[RetiredGySgt]

You are not American Patriots, you are Anti-American Traitors.

A Patriot puts their own nation and people first, a Patriot doesn't want potential terrorists coming into their nation to murder their own people.

You are Traitors pure and simple.

We stand for what America stands for, much of which is carved on our Statue of Liberty.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution.

That poem was added much later, and has no authority of law.

It does not have to have the authority of the law to represent what we as a nation stand for.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution

What the ****,?
It's everything we stand for..

What do we as a nation stand for? We stand for many things - more then what is just written in our Constitution. There is, I might point out - NOTHING in our Constitution regarding immigration.

Yes there is perhaps you should reread the Constitution.Immigration is in fact mentioned.

 

[Indeependent]

Trump has thoroughly pissed off too many of the wrong people.

Uh huh...Nope!

 

[Wyatt earp]

"July IV, MDCCLXXVI"

Is the date of the American Declaration of Independence. In non-Roman Numerals, July 4, 1776.

Yes it is inscribed on the tablet the Statue of Liberty is holding in her left arm.

It was a GIFT with an inscribed poem; it wasn't LEGISLATION.

Is anyone saying it's legislation?

WaitingFor2020 seemed to suggest it was, which is why I asked him where in the American Declaration of Independence does it say that America must have unlimited immigration and even unlimited immigration from hostile nations.

He's yet to answer, not that I'm surprised because it doesn't state anything of the sort in the American Declaration of Independence.

The Declaration of Independence is a founding document - not a governing document. It carries no weight in law. We are governed by the Constitution.

Bill of rights do.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

You assholes have the nerve to call liberals un-American and now you're trying to say the Statue of Liberty's inscriptions are meaningless to our laws. Oh So just go **** yourself.

Please relate them to the law. Take your time.

"July IV, MDCCLXXVI"
Look it up, low-information voter.

"July IV, MDCCLXXVI"

Is the date of the American Declaration of Independence. In non-Roman Numerals, July 4, 1776.

Yes it is inscribed on the tablet the Statue of Liberty is holding in her left arm.

It was a GIFT with an inscribed poem; it wasn't LEGISLATION.

I did not say there was legislation on the Statue of Liberty. What I said is in black-and-white above.

 

[Coyote]

WHO is TALKING about illegal immigration? Jeez dude - this is not about illegal immigration.

And Trump stopped all or most legal immigration from 7 countries. And no Judge has changed that.

You are trying to make this about illegal immigration - for what warped reason I can't fathom.

No you are claiming that somehow after the President stopped legal immigration we should still let them in, that would make them illegal.

I am? Where? What is it with you guys putting words in other's mouths?

Thus far, what I've said is I oppose Trump's EO (and am glad the judge put a stay on it).

Please link to where I'm stating we should allow illegal immigration. I'd hold my breath but doubt I could that long.

Ok dumb ass you as usual either did not bother to read what you are supporting or are lying. People in this thread have do and are arguing that A) the ban was stopped and B) the engraving on the Statue of Liberty is law. And then you came along half way through and start defending them. which means YOU are defending those positions.

No dumbass. I've never said it was law. So don't put words in my mouth.

 

[Lakhota]

Yes it is inscribed on the tablet the Statue of Liberty is holding in her left arm.

It was a GIFT with an inscribed poem; it wasn't LEGISLATION.

Is anyone saying it's legislation?

WaitingFor2020 seemed to suggest it was, which is why I asked him where in the American Declaration of Independence does it say that America must have unlimited immigration and even unlimited immigration from hostile nations.

He's yet to answer, not that I'm surprised because it doesn't state anything of the sort in the American Declaration of Independence.

The Declaration of Independence is a founding document - not a governing document. It carries no weight in law. We are governed by the Constitution.

Bill of rights do.

Duh, the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution.

 

[Wyatt earp]

You are not American Patriots, you are Anti-American Traitors.

A Patriot puts their own nation and people first, a Patriot doesn't want potential terrorists coming into their nation to murder their own people.

You are Traitors pure and simple.

We stand for what America stands for, much of which is carved on our Statue of Liberty.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution.

That poem was added much later, and has no authority of law.

It does not have to have the authority of the law to represent what we as a nation stand for.

It does not represent what we as a nation stand for, the NATION's majority stands for LEGAL immigration and NOT illegal immigration.

WHO is TALKING about illegal immigration? Jeez dude - this is not about illegal immigration.

Yes we're

 

[RetiredGySgt]

And Trump stopped all or most legal immigration from 7 countries. And no Judge has changed that.

You are trying to make this about illegal immigration - for what warped reason I can't fathom.

No you are claiming that somehow after the President stopped legal immigration we should still let them in, that would make them illegal.

I am? Where? What is it with you guys putting words in other's mouths?

Thus far, what I've said is I oppose Trump's EO (and am glad the judge put a stay on it).

Please link to where I'm stating we should allow illegal immigration. I'd hold my breath but doubt I could that long.

Ok dumb ass you as usual either did not bother to read what you are supporting or are lying. People in this thread have do and are arguing that A) the ban was stopped and B) the engraving on the Statue of Liberty is law. And then you came along half way through and start defending them. which means YOU are defending those positions.

No dumbass. I've never said it was law. So don't put words in my mouth.

You are defending people that said it.

 

[Indeependent]

Please relate them to the law. Take your time.

"July IV, MDCCLXXVI"
Look it up, low-information voter.

"July IV, MDCCLXXVI"

Is the date of the American Declaration of Independence. In non-Roman Numerals, July 4, 1776.

Yes it is inscribed on the tablet the Statue of Liberty is holding in her left arm.

It was a GIFT with an inscribed poem; it wasn't LEGISLATION.

I did not say there was legislation on the Statue of Liberty. What I said is in black-and-white above.

Usually you simply get everything wrong.
This time you inferred something as though it was law.
Which means you did the usual...got it wrong.

 

[Harry Dresden]

BREAKING NEWS on MSNBC.

That would be good news. Do you have a link?

.

It's only a Temporary Stay and it ONLY applies to those who have already landed in America on a valid visa, it does NOT reverse President Trump's EO banning Muslims from certain nations from being allowed to go to America.

Wait lakhota was lying.and misinforming........shocker!!!!!!!

lakota is one of them nazilibs....what would you expect?....

 

[ColonelAngus]

So according to OP, all flights from all countries in the EO to the USA have resumed.

This is not true.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It was a GIFT with an inscribed poem; it wasn't LEGISLATION.

Is anyone saying it's legislation?

WaitingFor2020 seemed to suggest it was, which is why I asked him where in the American Declaration of Independence does it say that America must have unlimited immigration and even unlimited immigration from hostile nations.

He's yet to answer, not that I'm surprised because it doesn't state anything of the sort in the American Declaration of Independence.

The Declaration of Independence is a founding document - not a governing document. It carries no weight in law. We are governed by the Constitution.

Bill of rights do.

Duh, the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution.

No they were made up later dumb ass.

 

[Coyote]

We stand for what America stands for, much of which is carved on our Statue of Liberty.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution.

That poem was added much later, and has no authority of law.

It does not have to have the authority of the law to represent what we as a nation stand for.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution

What the ****,?
It's everything we stand for..

What do we as a nation stand for? We stand for many things - more then what is just written in our Constitution. There is, I might point out - NOTHING in our Constitution regarding immigration.

Yes there is perhaps you should reread the Constitution.Immigration is in fact mentioned.

Citizenship is.

 

[Dale Smith]

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution.

That poem was added much later, and has no authority of law.

You assholes have the nerve to call liberals un-American and now you're trying to say the Statue of Liberty's inscriptions are meaningless to our laws. Oh So just go **** yourself.

Debate me on this, punkinpuss.....let's talk about the CFR and their plan to water down American nationalism by absolutely flooding it with illegals that have no intention of assimilating into American culture but want others to acquiesce into theirs....bring it on, asshole. I am loaded for bear and I will beat you down with historical facts from their white papers and those from other "think tanks"....but before I do, how many illegals are you willing to put up in your home or sponsor monetarily so others don't in a country that is already drowning in debt due to a central bank owned by foreigners? Face the fact, ya touchy, "feely" fabian socialist POS...you are nothing but a useful idiot and devoid of the facts or the situation we are in or the magnitude of it.

This wasn't and isn't about illegals, you stupid moron.

No, it was about people that were able to get a passport from a hostile country from coming over here when they have no legal right to do so per the E.O until they have been vetted...THAT was the point, dumb ass......

Nope, these people had the correct documentation to enter the country.
Why don't you just read the judges opinion when it's posted either this evening or tomorrow and argue with her? I'm sure she could whip your fat lazy ass a whole lot better than I could.

So the **** what if THEIR country allowed them to pass their sniff test for international travel...a sovereign country has THE right to deny entry to ANYONE from any country deemed a potential threat. Do you think that USA.INC was accepting visas from Japanese, German and Italian people during WWII with no scrutiny? That only happened AFTER WWII when under Operation Paperclip that the worst of war criminals were allowed to come over to America...but that's another story for another time.....but even a stupid **** like you should be able to get the gist of what I am saying...as mentally handicapped as you are.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution.

That poem was added much later, and has no authority of law.

It does not have to have the authority of the law to represent what we as a nation stand for.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution

What the ****,?
It's everything we stand for..

What do we as a nation stand for? We stand for many things - more then what is just written in our Constitution. There is, I might point out - NOTHING in our Constitution regarding immigration.

Yes there is perhaps you should reread the Constitution.Immigration is in fact mentioned.

Citizenship is.

Immigration is also IN the constitution.

 

[Indeependent]

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution.

That poem was added much later, and has no authority of law.

It does not have to have the authority of the law to represent what we as a nation stand for.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution

What the ****,?
It's everything we stand for..

What do we as a nation stand for? We stand for many things - more then what is just written in our Constitution. There is, I might point out - NOTHING in our Constitution regarding immigration.

Yes there is perhaps you should reread the Constitution.Immigration is in fact mentioned.

Citizenship is.

Where is the definition of how an Immigrant becomes a Citizen?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

You assholes have the nerve to call liberals un-American and now you're trying to say the Statue of Liberty's inscriptions are meaningless to our laws. Oh So just go **** yourself.

Please relate them to the law. Take your time.

"July IV, MDCCLXXVI"
Look it up, low-information voter.

"July IV, MDCCLXXVI"

Is the date of the American Declaration of Independence. In non-Roman Numerals, July 4, 1776.

Yes it is inscribed on the tablet the Statue of Liberty is holding in her left arm.

Nothing is inscribed on the tablets. The poem by Emma Lazarus is a plaque on the statue's foundation. It is a poem, not a law.

"It is a poem, not a law."

WTF we have reached an entirely new level of TOTAL MORON in this thread, they are directing people to a poem and attempting in bizarro fashion to INSIST that this poem shows that President Trump's EO is Un-Constitutional.

In normal minds of course the poem isn't enshrined in ANY American law but President Trump's EO is enshrined in an existing American law.

This law:

 

[Lakhota]

Is anyone saying it's legislation?

WaitingFor2020 seemed to suggest it was, which is why I asked him where in the American Declaration of Independence does it say that America must have unlimited immigration and even unlimited immigration from hostile nations.

He's yet to answer, not that I'm surprised because it doesn't state anything of the sort in the American Declaration of Independence.

The Declaration of Independence is a founding document - not a governing document. It carries no weight in law. We are governed by the Constitution.

Bill of rights do.

Duh, the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution.

No they were made up later dumb ass.

That is true.

Bill of Rights officially became part of the Constitution in December 1791.

Bill of Rights - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com

 

[Coyote]

It does not have to have the authority of the law to represent what we as a nation stand for.

What is carved on the Statue of Liberty has nothing to do with what we stand for, which is encoded in the Constitution

What the ****,?
It's everything we stand for..

What do we as a nation stand for? We stand for many things - more then what is just written in our Constitution. There is, I might point out - NOTHING in our Constitution regarding immigration.

Yes there is perhaps you should reread the Constitution.Immigration is in fact mentioned.

Citizenship is.

Immigration is also IN the constitution.

You're right. Point taken.

 

[Indeependent]

You assholes have the nerve to call liberals un-American and now you're trying to say the Statue of Liberty's inscriptions are meaningless to our laws. Oh So just go **** yourself.

Debate me on this, punkinpuss.....let's talk about the CFR and their plan to water down American nationalism by absolutely flooding it with illegals that have no intention of assimilating into American culture but want others to acquiesce into theirs....bring it on, asshole. I am loaded for bear and I will beat you down with historical facts from their white papers and those from other "think tanks"....but before I do, how many illegals are you willing to put up in your home or sponsor monetarily so others don't in a country that is already drowning in debt due to a central bank owned by foreigners? Face the fact, ya touchy, "feely" fabian socialist POS...you are nothing but a useful idiot and devoid of the facts or the situation we are in or the magnitude of it.

This wasn't and isn't about illegals, you stupid moron.

No, it was about people that were able to get a passport from a hostile country from coming over here when they have no legal right to do so per the E.O until they have been vetted...THAT was the point, dumb ass......

Nope, these people had the correct documentation to enter the country.
Why don't you just read the judges opinion when it's posted either this evening or tomorrow and argue with her? I'm sure she could whip your fat lazy ass a whole lot better than I could.

So the **** what if THEIR country allowed them to pass their sniff test for international travel...a sovereign country has THE right to deny entry to ANYONE from any country deemed a potential threat. Do you think that USA.INC was accepting visas from Japanese, German and Italian people during WWII with no scrutiny? That only happened AFTER WWII when under Operation Paperclip that the worst of war criminals were allowed to come over to America...but that's another story for another time.....but even a stupid **** like you should be able to get the gist of what I am saying...as mentally handicapped as you are.

This is scary...
Is Liberal Retardation genetic or is it something in the paint chips they eat?