Breaking News! Andrew McCabe Fired Without Pension

[Steve_McGarrett]

Breaking Update!


Report: McCabe Threatened to 'Take People Down With Him if Fired'

 

[S.J.]

McCabe's pension comes out of the pockets of taxpayers and I am one of them.

Hey asshole, he served this country for 22 years and EARNED IT. You make it sound as if he wrote himself a check out of your account.

He's a ******* traitor to his country, asshole. He's EARNED a prison sentence.

 

[AntonToo]

McCabe's pension comes out of the pockets of taxpayers and I am one of them.

Hey asshole, he served this country for 22 years and EARNED IT. You make it sound as if he wrote himself a check out of your account.

He's a ******* traitor to his country, asshole. He's EARNED a prison sentence.

lol "traitor"? Wtf are you talking about idiot?

He is getting fired for screwing Hillary by leaking to media her getting investigated and then not coming clean about it.

One more time: McCabe, a Republican, got fired by other Republicans for screwing a Democrat candiddate.

Why? Becuase he is a witness in a case on Trump's Obstruciton of Justice and needs to be pre-emptively discredited.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump may be very sorry for opening up this can of worms. Media will be digging deeply into all of this.

Who in the **** cares princess, their idiots... They could not find their ass with both hands...

I doubt Merkel is going to allow that.

 

[S.J.]

McCabe's pension comes out of the pockets of taxpayers and I am one of them.

Hey asshole, he served this country for 22 years and EARNED IT. You make it sound as if he wrote himself a check out of your account.

He's a ******* traitor to his country, asshole. He's EARNED a prison sentence.

lol "traitor"? Wtf are you talking about idiot?

He is getting fired for screwing Hillary by leaking to media her getting investigated and then not coming clean about it.

One more time: McCabe, a Republican, got fired by other Republicans for screwing a Democrat candiddate.

Why? Becuase he is a witness in a case on Trump's Obstruciton of Justice and needs to be pre-emptively discredited.

Republicans, Democrats, I don't give a shit what letter they have in front of their name. John McCain is a "Republican" too, but he's still part of the cesspool of liberal politics. BTW, why are you not talking about collusion anymore? Now it's obstruction of justice. Moving on to the next smear, I see. Hey, how's that Stormy Daniels thing going? Getting any traction on that yet?

 

[bripat9643]

Bernie Sanders will be next , hahaha lets not forget the pos bought a new beach home not long ago......

View attachment 183092

Julian Assange on Twitter

who cares about stoopid Sanders

I want Clinton I want Comey I want Holder in jail


...and then some!

You want to put innocent people in jail because they are political opponents???????

You've got to be from Siberia. Acting like you were raised by wolves isn't allowed in this country. Oh, you may get away with it for a while, but the American people are waking up.

That's what you douchebags are trying to do to the Trump Administration, so who are you to point the finger?

Yes, the American people are waking up.

 

[The Professor]

So sad. McCabe never had an opportunity for due process. They could have always revoked his pension at a later date after McCabe having the opportunity to present his defense. They could have let McCabe exhaust the appeals process. Even death row inmates have that right. This really stinks. Friday night massacre. McCabe was due to retire on Sunday, March 18. They're trying to discredit his testimony in the Mueller investigation. Trump has his fingerprints all over this vindictive atrocity.

And they have employees afraid. The ss is taking over. This getting scary

Employees who violate the law should be afraid

So you are going to be OK with Trump getting charged?

If he is stupid enough to commit a crime heck yeah

He already has. If they find out someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf and he knew about it, he can be charged with accessory.

You are wrong.

Merely knowing someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf does not make Trump an accessory. Your problem is that you offer a legal opinion on a subject which you know nothing about. Here is a definition of the crime of accessory:

“In Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime. One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant, as by command, advice, instigation, or concealment; either before or after the fact or commission.

"One who aids, abets, commands, or counsels another in the commission of a crime.

“In common law, an accessory could not be found guilty unless the actual perpetrator was convicted. In most U.S. jurisdictions today, however, an accessory can be convicted even if the principal actor is not arrested or is acquitted. The prosecution must establish that the accessory in some way instigated, furthered, or concealed the crime. Typically, punishment for a convicted accessory is not as severe as that for the perpetrator.”

accessory

CONCLUSION: To be charged with being an accessory, there must be proof the accused was somehow involved in the commission of the crime. Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory.

I have a doctorate in law and I am amused at how often so many posters make comments about the law that are patently false.

 

[bripat9643]

Story breaking right now. Will have a link ASAP. Laura Ingraham reporting it now.

This will only help Stormy Daniels.

Everyone will know that a Dick is a billionaire who fires a man who worked at the FBI for decades two days before he would retire. During the years McCabe worked for the country, Cadet Bone Spurs was tricking people into working and then refusing to pay them, tricking people into giving money to a criminal organization called the Trump Foundation (still under criminal investigation) and having unprotected sex with a porn star around the time his pregnant wife was giving birth.
You would think after Trump University, Right Wingers would have figured out a few things. Many of the victims "schooled" there are/were Republicans.

Now, when Stormy says that Trump tried to do her harm, Trump can't possibly say it's not true. Look at what he did to this guy.

This guy who was found by his colleagues in the inspector generals office to have committed perjury and other crimes.

How did trump get his colleagues to do that?

You don't know that. We won't know what happened until it's investigated, not alleged.
Of course if you are going to screw someone out of their pension two days before they retire you have to have some kind of claim. Will it hold up? Probably not. Remember, this is a president who told us he lied to Canada's leader. The guy is a liar. And look at the people who work for him. Needing to get their paperwork rewritten again and again. So many lies.

Trump wasn't involved in the decision, moron. It had nothing to do with Trump.

 

[Lewdog]

And they have employees afraid. The ss is taking over. This getting scary

Employees who violate the law should be afraid

So you are going to be OK with Trump getting charged?

If he is stupid enough to commit a crime heck yeah

He already has. If they find out someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf and he knew about it, he can be charged with accessory.

You are wrong.

Merely knowing someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf does not make Trump an accessory. Your problem is that you offer a legal opinion on a subject which you know nothing about. Here is a definition of the crime of accessory:

“In Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime. One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant, as by command, advice, instigation, or concealment; either before or after the fact or commission.

"One who aids, abets, commands, or counsels another in the commission of a crime.

“In common law, an accessory could not be found guilty unless the actual perpetrator was convicted. In most U.S. jurisdictions today, however, an accessory can be convicted even if the principal actor is not arrested or is acquitted. The prosecution must establish that the accessory in some way instigated, furthered, or concealed the crime. Typically, punishment for a convicted accessory is not as severe as that for the perpetrator.”

accessory

CONCLUSION: To be charged with being an accessory, there must be proof the accused was somehow involved in the commission of the crime. Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory.

I have a doctorate in law and I am amused at how often so many posters make comments about the law that are patently false.

...and if Cohen, Trump's lawyer did threaten her in order to get her to sign the NDA, which we know he used the Trump Org email in order to do it... and Trump knew about it and approved of it, he IS an accessory to the crime. Especially given Cohen IS working on behalf of Trump and has already been quoted as saying he carries a gun and will do ANYTHING to protect Trump.

Let me add something as well... for someone that has a Doctorate in law, you should know better than to make statements like:

"Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory."

You have no idea what evidence there is yet.

 

[Lakhota]

Sessions apparently fired McCabe to protect Mueller. McCabe will likely get his pension.

 

[westwall]

So sad. McCabe never had an opportunity for due process. They could have always revoked his pension at a later date after McCabe having the opportunity to present his defense. They could have let McCabe exhaust the appeals process. Even death row inmates have that right. This really stinks. Friday night massacre. McCabe was due to retire on Sunday, March 18. They're trying to discredit his testimony as a fact witness in the Mueller investigation regarding the Comey firing. Trump has his fingerprints all over this vindictive atrocity.

McCabe responded to the firing in a lengthy statement.

“The investigation by the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) has to be understood in the context of the attacks on my credibility,” McCabe wrote.

He continued:

The investigation flows from my attempt to explain the FBI’s involvement and my supervision of investigations involving Hillary Clinton. I was being portrayed in the media over and over as a political partisan, accused of closing down investigations under political pressure. The FBI was portrayed as caving under that pressure, and making decisions for political rather than law enforcement purposes. Nothing was further from the truth. In fact, this entire investigation stems from my efforts, fully authorized under FBI rules, to set the record straight on behalf of the Bureau, and to make clear that we were continuing an investigation that people in DOJ opposed.​

Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe Is Fired 2 Days Before Retirement

There will be a lawsuit over this, guaranteed.

That would be awesom. Let McCabe blow all his money. Let him get ground down like they did to Flynn. What would be awesom is if they dug up dirt on his wife and gave him a choice, be a man and take your licks, or they will go after his wife and sassinate her character like Masuller did to Flynn. A law site from McCabe would also bring a ton of other shit out into the light. **** McCabe. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Flynn pleaded guilty

Breaking Update!

Sessions statement:

And yet idiot libtards will falsly blame Trump.

Dean just claimed there hasn't been an investigation

Don't you know lying is wrong? Oh wait, YOU don't. I figured that.
Like I said, I'm sure something was written. After all, you have to have a reason to fire someone. The question is, will it stand up to scrutiny?

It is so extraordinarily difficult to fire a high level bureaucrat that the only way it happened is if there is serious, well documented, evidence. I guarantee you that criminal charges are being drawn up right now. Before he could be charged criminally he had to be fired.

This rodeo is just getting started.

 

[Lewdog]

And they have employees afraid. The ss is taking over. This getting scary

Employees who violate the law should be afraid

So you are going to be OK with Trump getting charged?

If he is stupid enough to commit a crime heck yeah

He already has. If they find out someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf and he knew about it, he can be charged with accessory.

You are wrong.

Merely knowing someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf does not make Trump an accessory. Your problem is that you offer a legal opinion on a subject which you know nothing about. Here is a definition of the crime of accessory:

“In Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime. One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant, as by command, advice, instigation, or concealment; either before or after the fact or commission.

"One who aids, abets, commands, or counsels another in the commission of a crime.

“In common law, an accessory could not be found guilty unless the actual perpetrator was convicted. In most U.S. jurisdictions today, however, an accessory can be convicted even if the principal actor is not arrested or is acquitted. The prosecution must establish that the accessory in some way instigated, furthered, or concealed the crime. Typically, punishment for a convicted accessory is not as severe as that for the perpetrator.”

accessory

CONCLUSION: To be charged with being an accessory, there must be proof the accused was somehow involved in the commission of the crime. Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory.

I have a doctorate in law and I am amused at how often so many posters make comments about the law that are patently false.

Let me add:

"A criminal charge of aiding and abetting or accessory can usually be brought against anyone who helps in the commission of a crime, though legal distinctions vary by state. A person charged with aiding and abetting or accessory is usually not present when the crime itself is committed, but he or she has knowledge of the crime before or after the fact, and may assist in its commission through advice, actions, or financial support. Depending on the degree of involvement, the offender's participation in the crime may rise to the level of conspiracy."

Aiding and Abetting/Accessory - FindLaw

... and we already know that Cohen expected Trump to pay him back. A good prosecutor could make a case depending on what evidence Daniels apparently has.

I don't have a Doctorate in law, I am just a grad student in Criminology with an undergrad degree in Criminal Justice.

So if Cohen threatened her physically, we'll see what happens.

All this other stuff Trump is doing is just a distraction tactic to take away from him getting buried in legal trouble.

 

[bripat9643]

Employees who violate the law should be afraid

So you are going to be OK with Trump getting charged?

If he is stupid enough to commit a crime heck yeah

He already has. If they find out someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf and he knew about it, he can be charged with accessory.

You are wrong.

Merely knowing someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf does not make Trump an accessory. Your problem is that you offer a legal opinion on a subject which you know nothing about. Here is a definition of the crime of accessory:

“In Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime. One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant, as by command, advice, instigation, or concealment; either before or after the fact or commission.

"One who aids, abets, commands, or counsels another in the commission of a crime.

“In common law, an accessory could not be found guilty unless the actual perpetrator was convicted. In most U.S. jurisdictions today, however, an accessory can be convicted even if the principal actor is not arrested or is acquitted. The prosecution must establish that the accessory in some way instigated, furthered, or concealed the crime. Typically, punishment for a convicted accessory is not as severe as that for the perpetrator.”

accessory

CONCLUSION: To be charged with being an accessory, there must be proof the accused was somehow involved in the commission of the crime. Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory.

I have a doctorate in law and I am amused at how often so many posters make comments about the law that are patently false.

...and if Cohen, Trump's lawyer did threaten her in order to get her to sign the NDA, which we know he used the Trump Org email in order to do it... and Trump knew about it and approved of it, he IS an accessory to the crime. Especially given Cohen IS working on behalf of Trump and has already been quoted as saying he carries a gun and will do ANYTHING to protect Trump.

Let me add something as well... for someone that has a Doctorate in law, you should know better than to make statements like:

"Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory."

You have no idea what evidence there is yet.

"If, if, if, if." When you have some actual evidence that Cohen or Trump are involved in any way, then vent your spleen. Until then you're fantasizing.

 

[Lewdog]

So you are going to be OK with Trump getting charged?

If he is stupid enough to commit a crime heck yeah

He already has. If they find out someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf and he knew about it, he can be charged with accessory.

You are wrong.

Merely knowing someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf does not make Trump an accessory. Your problem is that you offer a legal opinion on a subject which you know nothing about. Here is a definition of the crime of accessory:

“In Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime. One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant, as by command, advice, instigation, or concealment; either before or after the fact or commission.

"One who aids, abets, commands, or counsels another in the commission of a crime.

“In common law, an accessory could not be found guilty unless the actual perpetrator was convicted. In most U.S. jurisdictions today, however, an accessory can be convicted even if the principal actor is not arrested or is acquitted. The prosecution must establish that the accessory in some way instigated, furthered, or concealed the crime. Typically, punishment for a convicted accessory is not as severe as that for the perpetrator.”

accessory

CONCLUSION: To be charged with being an accessory, there must be proof the accused was somehow involved in the commission of the crime. Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory.

I have a doctorate in law and I am amused at how often so many posters make comments about the law that are patently false.

...and if Cohen, Trump's lawyer did threaten her in order to get her to sign the NDA, which we know he used the Trump Org email in order to do it... and Trump knew about it and approved of it, he IS an accessory to the crime. Especially given Cohen IS working on behalf of Trump and has already been quoted as saying he carries a gun and will do ANYTHING to protect Trump.

Let me add something as well... for someone that has a Doctorate in law, you should know better than to make statements like:

"Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory."

You have no idea what evidence there is yet.

"If, if, if, if." When you have some actual evidence that Cohen or Trump are involved in any way, then vent your spleen. Until then you're fantasizing.

We KNOW that Cohen used his Trump Org email to set up the NDA. That is a FACT. We KNOW that Cohen has said he carries a gun and will do anything to protect Trump. He said it.

In her interview Daniels is going to tell it all, and she says she has proof.

 

[Meathead]

McCabe's pension comes out of the pockets of taxpayers and I am one of them.

Hey asshole, he served this country for 22 years and EARNED IT. You make it sound as if he wrote himself a check out of your account.

The guy is 50 years old. He can work and profit from his own sleaze. No tears.

 

[Kosh]

Good the far left religion is finally being dismantled and being forced out of government.

 

[Geaux4it]

As he should have been. Criminal charges are coming 1-May

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

So there was collusion.... This will lead to that ***** Clinton and the fruit cake Obama

-Geaux

 

[bripat9643]

If he is stupid enough to commit a crime heck yeah

He already has. If they find out someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf and he knew about it, he can be charged with accessory.

You are wrong.

Merely knowing someone threatened Stormy Daniels on his behalf does not make Trump an accessory. Your problem is that you offer a legal opinion on a subject which you know nothing about. Here is a definition of the crime of accessory:

“In Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime. One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant, as by command, advice, instigation, or concealment; either before or after the fact or commission.

"One who aids, abets, commands, or counsels another in the commission of a crime.

“In common law, an accessory could not be found guilty unless the actual perpetrator was convicted. In most U.S. jurisdictions today, however, an accessory can be convicted even if the principal actor is not arrested or is acquitted. The prosecution must establish that the accessory in some way instigated, furthered, or concealed the crime. Typically, punishment for a convicted accessory is not as severe as that for the perpetrator.”

accessory

CONCLUSION: To be charged with being an accessory, there must be proof the accused was somehow involved in the commission of the crime. Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory.

I have a doctorate in law and I am amused at how often so many posters make comments about the law that are patently false.

...and if Cohen, Trump's lawyer did threaten her in order to get her to sign the NDA, which we know he used the Trump Org email in order to do it... and Trump knew about it and approved of it, he IS an accessory to the crime. Especially given Cohen IS working on behalf of Trump and has already been quoted as saying he carries a gun and will do ANYTHING to protect Trump.

Let me add something as well... for someone that has a Doctorate in law, you should know better than to make statements like:

"Since there is no evidence that Trump was involved in the threat in any way he could not be charged with being an accessory."

You have no idea what evidence there is yet.

"If, if, if, if." When you have some actual evidence that Cohen or Trump are involved in any way, then vent your spleen. Until then you're fantasizing.

We KNOW that Cohen used his Trump Org email to set up the NDA. That is a FACT. We KNOW that Cohen has said he carries a gun and will do anything to protect Trump. He said it.

In her interview Daniels is going to tell it all, and she says she has proof.

Post a link showing Cohen has said these things. I haven't found any such claims using Google.

 

[Care4all]

May the same mercy shown to McCabe be shown to all of you.....amen!