Breaking: Democrats and Leftist Media Dread As Tucker Carlson to Fully Reveal January 6 Truth Tonight.

Yes. Freedom means freedom from control of information from a single point of view. That is why they instituted the Fairness Doctrine. The reason they revoked it was because in the 80's with widespread Cable TV access, the News sources became eclectic. Now by funneling this information through a single paristan network, everyone had to rely on a single partisan source, not the wide variety of sources that freed information sharing from those regulation.
 
Yes. Freedom means freedom from control of information from a single point of view. That is why they instituted the Fairness Doctrine. The reason they revoke it was because in the 80's with widespread Cable TV access, the News sources became eclectic. Now by funneling this information through a single paristan network, everyone had to rely on a single partisan source, not the wide variety of sources that freed information sharing from those regulation.
no it doesnt,,
 
Yes. Freedom means freedom from control of information from a single point of view. That is why they instituted the Fairness Doctrine. The reason they revoked it was because in the 80's with widespread Cable TV access, the News sources became eclectic. Now by funneling this information through a single paristan network, everyone had to rely on a single partisan source, not the wide variety of sources that freed information sharing from those regulation.


None of that is true.
 
no it doesnt,,

None of that is true.

It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, aesthetic, moral and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.

— U.S. Supreme Court, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 1969.

McCarthy abridged that right by giving Tucker the monopoly on the videos.
 
It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, aesthetic, moral and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.

— U.S. Supreme Court, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 1969.

McCarthy abridged that right by giving Tucker the monopoly on the videos.
no he didnt,,
 
It is the purpose of the First Amendment to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which truth will ultimately prevail, rather than to countenance monopolization of that market, whether it be by the government itself or a private licensee. It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, aesthetic, moral and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.

— U.S. Supreme Court, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 1969.

McCarthy abridged that right by giving Tucker the monopoly on the videos.

You really are a partisan fucking idiot, man.
 
I know that:

1) a good percentage of the 81 million ballots were harvested by going door to door in poor, ignorant areas - in swing states of course - and manipulating them into checking the box for Biden.

2) enough Biden voters would have voted for Trump instead if the DOJ hadn’t conspired with media to denounce and/or suppress the Hunter laptop story.

This was not a true election.
The deep state panicked in 2020.

Approximately the same way they did when Kennedy was shot.

These days they don't shoot you, they just cancel you.
 
In fact by restricting access to a single network he has censored the other networks from reporting on the content of those videos.

Why does the Neo-GOP hate freedom of Speech and freedom of the Press.

Because it's their fascist nature of course!

Or you are simply insanely grasping at handfuls or air.
 
After they were flash bombed intentionally!! But again, demofks hid it!! You merely accept demofk lies
Its shocking how pathetic you people are.

This is why you can't get ahead in life and are a total loser, you can't accept reality and that is a problem to the vast majority of people

Im sure you fuck everything up at your work and then blame everybody else, so your boss thinks you're a bum

HaHa, your people rioted at the Capitol based on total lies because they got played for suckas by Trump, its all on tape and we can watch you people look like fuckin idiots, rioting like total fools and running around in combat vests like wanna be bad asses.
You people look stupid AF and pathetic too
 
Its shocking how pathetic you people are.

This is why you can't get ahead in life and are a total loser, you can't accept reality and that is a problem to the vast majority of people

Im sure you fuck everything up at your work and then blame everybody else, so your boss thinks you're a bum

HaHa, your people rioted at the Capitol based on total lies because they got played for suckas by Trump, its all on tape and we can watch you people look like fuckin idiots, rioting like total fools and running around in combat vests like wanna be bad asses.
You people look stupid AF and pathetic too
When the facts frustrates a demofk
 
was he arrested on the spot? I know there's video of cops opening the main doors.

I don't believe anyone there that day was arrested on the spot. And the doors BuffaloHead entered through were kicked open by Trump's thugs, not police.

Still, do Tucker's videos mean he didn't enter the Capitol illegally?
 
so? he never threatened them. Not even close, nor did he show any violent actions. He was allowed to march right through with his weapon, the flag.

You're deranged. An armed lunatic breaking into the Capitol is not a threat??

d445b99984c06f24e63036ac81e7501a.gif
 
they did escort him. Not one of the cops took his weapon the flag, didn't detain him as a person who broke in and seemed quite hospitable to him.

That doesn't make it an escort. In all but one scene I've seen, they were following him. And with no audio, we have no idea what they were telling him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top