BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault

[bripat9643]

Another hole in an accuser's story. This is getting predictable.

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION! An attorney for GOP Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore revealed Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson lied when she said no contact had been made between the Judge and herself following the alleged sexual advancement in 1977.​

More Gateway Pundit bullshit? Stop it. Just stop it.

I will if you stop with the WAPO bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

Didn't Moore say he had never met her?

Do you remember everyone that talked to you at work by name?

Dumb ass!

So, this thread means nothing.

Your contribution was nothing.

Why would she remember seeing him at that time if he didn't remember seeing her?

His name would be on her divorces papers. You would think she would remember his name.

 

[bripat9643]

Another hole in an accuser's story. This is getting predictable.

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION! An attorney for GOP Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore revealed Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson lied when she said no contact had been made between the Judge and herself following the alleged sexual advancement in 1977.​

Why was he banned from the mall? You are deplorable

He wasn't banned from the mall, douchebag.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Didn't Moore say he had never met her?

Do you remember everyone that talked to you at work by name?

Dumb ass!

So, this thread means nothing.

Your contribution was nothing.

Why would she remember seeing him at that time if he didn't remember seeing her?

His name would be on her divorces papers. You would think she would remember his name.

He didn’t sign them, according to the OP he dismissed her case. Meaning she likely didn’t show up for a hearing and her petition was dismissed.




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[radical right]

His name would be on her divorces papers. You would think she would remember his name.

When I got a traffic ticket, I went before a judge. I didn't have any contact with him other than standing there while he yelled at me.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

These Dirty Democrat smear campaigns are the lowest form of politics

 

[radical right]

These Dirty Democrat smear campaigns are the lowest form of politics

Really, you know Trump has nominated four people who the ABA rated as unqualified to be a judge, to permanent federal bench positions.

Their only qualification, was their politics.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

These Dirty Democrat smear campaigns are the lowest form of politics

Really, you know Trump has nominated four people who the ABA rated as unqualified to be a judge, to permanent federal bench positions.

Their only qualification, was their politics.

They are lawyers, and even THAT is not a qualification!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Didn't Moore say he had never met her?

Do you remember everyone that talked to you at work by name?

Dumb ass!

So, this thread means nothing.

Your contribution was nothing.

Why would she remember seeing him at that time if he didn't remember seeing her?

His name would be on her divorces papers. You would think she would remember his name.

Let's try this one more time...according to your very own first post in this thread....JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

If Moore dismissed her divorce action, guess where his name will not be...on her divorce papers.

Not to mention that I never once looked at the judge's name on mine, just made sure they were filed.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

These Dirty Democrat smear campaigns are the lowest form of politics

Really, you know Trump has nominated four people who the ABA rated as unqualified to be a judge, to permanent federal bench positions.

Their only qualification, was their politics.

They are lawyers, and even THAT is not a qualification!

Actually one of them has been a lawyer less than 3 years and has never tried a case in a courtroom. But he was a paranormal blogger that supported Trump, so that makes him qualified in Trump's eyes

 

[bripat9643]

These Dirty Democrat smear campaigns are the lowest form of politics

Really, you know Trump has nominated four people who the ABA rated as unqualified to be a judge, to permanent federal bench positions.

Their only qualification, was their politics.

The ABA is just another leftwing propaganda organ. Their ratings don't mean jack shit.

 

[radical right]

The ABA is just another leftwing propaganda organ. Their ratings don't mean jack shit.

Just like the NBER is a leftwing propaganda organ?

 

[Kondor3]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

 

[Kondor3]

Too late for that $hit now... new accusers keep coming out of the woodwork on a daily basis.

Even if half of them lied... that still leaves the other half.

Moore is not (yet) convicted of the terrible crime of pedophilia.

But anyone backing him is going to be committing political suicide over the next few days or weeks.

Most of the Republican Party has already thrown the sonofabitch under the bus.

Wise-up, and do the same, before you become known for standing alongside a pedophile.

Your choice.

You've been warned.

He can't be convicted!...

Granted.

...The statute of limitations ran out about 36 years ago!...

Yep.

So what?

...Think about that for a minute. 36 years ago! I was a student in college about 100 miles south of there at the time...

So what?

...Were you even breathing then?

Yep...

Already out of the Army... done with school on the GI Bill... two of my three kids already in school... third one on the way... well-established in my career by then.

So what?

Damn, you are an old fart!

Yep... and still going strong...

...but that's irrelevant to whether Moore should step down while he still can, and whether supporters should back away while THEY still can.

If he steps down, the Democrats win. If he stays in and wins, he can still decide to resign and they can give the seat back to his predecessor.

The Republican National Committee has wisely bailed on your pedophile.

The Republican Committee of Alabama is considering that very move as we speak.

Better to put one seat at risk rather than go down in flames by losing the Moral High Ground nationwide.

Rather like spending a dollar to make a dime... there's no percentage in it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

The ever liberal LA Times disagrees that no one will expel him because he did not violate Senate rules and was not facing a criminal charge.

 

[Kondor3]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

The ever liberal LA Times disagrees that no one will expel him because he did not violate Senate rules and was not facing a criminal charge.

Mitch McConnel's opinion counts within the walls of the Senate chambers just a wee bit more than your grasping-at-straws LA Times reference.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

The ever liberal LA Times disagrees that no one will expel him because he did not violate Senate rules and was not facing a criminal charge.

Mitch McConnel's opinion counts within the walls of the Senate chambers just a wee bit more than your grasping-at-straws LA Times reference.

Really? Most of the Republicans in the Senate are calling for his head on a plate!

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Another hole in an accuser's story. This is getting predictable.

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION! An attorney for GOP Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore revealed Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson lied when she said no contact had been made between the Judge and herself following the alleged sexual advancement in 1977.​

Sorry, but this doesn't mean jack.
1. When you're involved in any kind of civil action, you don't get to pick the judge who handles your case.
2. Neither do you necessarily ever appear in front of that judge, especially in a divorce action. That's the lawyer's jobs who are representing the plaintiff and defendant.
3. So read the article again, dimwit. There is nothing either from Moore's attorney today or the Gateway BLOG that says she appeared in court in front of Moore.
4. It says he dismissed her case.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Wow. Imagine being assigned a pedophile Judge that raped you as a child. Disgusting.

Imagine not mentioning a huge conflict of interest with a judge deciding on your divorce

95% of divorces don't go to trial. Even if its true that her divorce was assigned to him, it's unlikely that they would have had any "contact".

Exactly. I got a divorce in Utah while I was living in Pennsylvania. We did it all by notarized documents. Never even saw the inside of a courtroom much less the judge.

 

[Kondor3]

...They cannot kick him out because of something he did 40 years before he was ever in the Senate...

Sure they can.

...You need to learn that rules do apply. Most libs think they don't!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Process_leading_to_expulsion

All they have to do is to nail him on an Ethics violation... and there is no such thing as ex post facto protection in this instance.

It's the Senate's way of kicking somebody out who is of a fundamentally flawed character.

To borrow a line from an old cajun TV chef... Justin Wilson... "Your boy is toast. Gaaarrrroonnnnttteeeeeeeeddd !!!"

The ever liberal LA Times disagrees that no one will expel him because he did not violate Senate rules and was not facing a criminal charge.

Mitch McConnel's opinion counts within the walls of the Senate chambers just a wee bit more than your grasping-at-straws LA Times reference.

Really? Most of the Republicans in the Senate are calling for his head on a plate!

Bingo... so is McConnel... who promised, this very day, to haul him in front of the Senate Ethics Committee, very shortly after being sworn in.