Canada; why the hell would anyone want that hole?Easy - he wants to annex Canada to be his 51st next state were he can commit further offenses of the likes, and.... be @real Donaldine
View attachment 1217763
Greg
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Canada; why the hell would anyone want that hole?Easy - he wants to annex Canada to be his 51st next state were he can commit further offenses of the likes, and.... be @real Donaldine
View attachment 1217763
"Woman wearing a dress"? Is that a euphemism for "transgender"?
"BREAKING: 10 people are dead, 25 injured after a “woman wearing a dress” opened fire on a school in British Columbia, CanadaLocal police are referring to the shooter as a “gunperson.”Yeah, we all know this is yet another trans mass shooter."
"The suspect, who was first identified as a woman wearing a dress with brown hair, was found dead shortly after the police arrived. Authorities say she died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The threat is neutralized, however, and investigators are looking at the likelihood that a second suspect planned or carried out the attack."
Canada School Shooting: 10 killed, several injured in mass shooting; Suspect Shot Dead
OIL&LNG ??? and because it just happens to make the USA look bigger? + don't forget Greenland, or did he actually also include Iceland?Canada; why the hell would anyone want that hole?
Greg
So Dragonlady has doxxed herself.
.SAD all the way around.
Well, there goes another Left-wing social justice warrior doing their thing.
Family has already given him up.Haven’t we been down this road before where there’s a shooting and you people speculate wildly about the identity of the shooter only to wind up being completely off base?
Couldn’t “a woman in a dress” simply mean a woman in a dress?
According to “Juno News”?Family has already given him up.
Even if this shooter is not a trans, you should pause and look at the statistical tendency trams people have taken to gun violence of late.Haven’t we been down this road before where there’s a shooting and you people speculate wildly about the identity of the shooter only to wind up being completely off base?
Couldn’t “a woman in a dress” simply mean a woman in a dress?
And that is discrediting how?According to “Juno News”?
Then why are you people almost always wrong when you try to speculate?Even if this shooter is not a trans, you should pause and look at the statistical tendency trams people have taken to gun violence of late.
But no, you are still in denial.
It’s a right wing blog.And that is discrediting how?
.Even if this shooter is not a trans, you should pause and look at the statistical tendency trams people have taken to gun violence of late.
But no, you are still in denial.
Haven’t we been down this road before where there’s a shooting and you people speculate wildly about the identity of the shooter only to wind up being completely off base?
Couldn’t “a woman in a dress” simply mean a woman in a dress?
So your entire basis for claiming you know the shooter was a trans is that?What does "gunperson" tell you?