- May 20, 2009
- 144,526
- 66,938
- 2,330
Kagan was never a judge before becoming an associate SCOTUS justice.
When the spot opened supposedly Kagan called Obama and asked , "How is my favorite foreign law student who never attended a single class?"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Kagan was never a judge before becoming an associate SCOTUS justice.
Bush Jr. didn't think a black women would be good for the S.C. he would have nominated her first.
Instead he put 3 white men on the SC.
That was out of context and content seeing as though Harris called him racist.
The minimum requirements are far from the skills needed to do the job fairly and correctly.Just telling you the requirements specifed by the US Constitution for a US Supreme Court Justice
Biden only picked her because she fulfills three prerequisites: Black, female, and to prove to himself that he's not "racist." Those were the same reason he chose Kamala Harris, especially after she called him a racist during the presidential debates.
Frankly, after listening to this person's answers so far, this person is dumber than a bag of rocks. Just like Harris is dumber than a bag of rocks.
Racist^^^^^^I'm surprised he didn't break out his Kunta Kinte speech.
What a racist ^^^^^^^I'd be angry and insulted if the charge was to nominate an "Italian American" to fill Scalia seat and the President nominated the absolute dumbest fuck he could find, that's what you have with Ketanji Jumanji
...and Biden filibustered Janice Rogers Brown because....
Choosing a candidate based primarily on race and gender is racist and sexist and also in violation of EEOC regulations since 1965.Racist^^^^^^
I am happy that you are finally coming to grips with your problem--racist.What a racist ^^^^^^^
So I'd like to hear the 'real reason' the conservatives support Candace Owens.Choosing a candidate based primarily on race and gender is racist and sexist and also in violation of EEOC regulations since 1965.
Sorry? Please show me where Candace Owens was being considered as a SCOTUS justice based on her gender and race. Try again moron.So I'd like to hear the 'real reason' the conservatives support Candace Owens.
It certainly can't be because of all of her accomplishments, which are nil.
Oh, got it.Sorry? Please show me where Candace Owens was being considered as a SCOTUS justice based on her gender and race. Try again moron.
So I'd like to hear the 'real reason' the conservatives support Candace Owens.
It certainly can't be because of all of her accomplishments, which are nil.
Then maybe she should try getting the job by her skills and not by her race and genderThe minimum requirements are far from the skills needed to do the job fairly and correctly.
Oh, got it.
So conservative support for owens to run for POTUS or be selected as VP, that's different?
Again, in what universe was that ever attempted--you base too much of your life on the talk show circuit, moron.Oh, got it.
So conservative support for owens to run for POTUS or be selected as VP, that's different?
Again, in what universe was that ever attempted--you base too much of your life on the talk show circuit, moron.
Wrong.Oprah Winfrey? You understand a Supreme Court Justice needs to be trained in the law, don't you dumb ass?
So I'd like to hear the 'real reason' the conservatives support Candace Owens.
It certainly can't be because of all of her accomplishments, which are nil.
So I'd like to hear the 'real reason' the conservatives support Candace Owens.
It certainly can't be because of all of her accomplishments, which are nil.