Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is nothing fake about the hockey stick graph.
What other data of his do you believe to be fake? You claimed he would not reveal it but I showed you that he had released all of it years ago.
Yeah, that's what I want to do, follow "the science." FOR POLICY MAKERS. You're a moron who cannot understand that the end game is "population control." Fuck off lemming, you're an idiot.If you are looking for information about global warming, there is no place better than the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) at www.ipcc.ch. The Summary for Policy Makers
What's "end game" do you believe to be population control?Yeah, that's what I want to do, follow "the science." FOR POLICY MAKERS. You're a moron who cannot understand that the end game is "population control." Fuck off lemming, you're an idiot.
And thank you for your confirmation that you don't get your climatology information from climatology scientists.Thanks for the confirmation.
Comprehension isn't big on your list either. However you DID comfirm that you are a leftist moron.And thank you for your confirmation that you don't get your climatology information from climatology scientists.
It is obvious you are a rightist, but I'm still awaiting evidence of intelligence...Comprehension isn't big on your list either. However you DID comfirm that you are a leftist moron.
You'll never be able to recognize that which you are devoid of.It is obvious you are a rightist, but I'm still awaiting evidence of intelligence...
Why would it bother any honest person?Adding real temps to proxy temps doesn't bother you?
www.pnas.org
agwobserver.wordpress.com
Why would it bother any honest person?
Proxy temps don't extend to the present. Thermometer temps don't extend to the distant past. It's common sense and common practice to splice them together, using the overlap to calibrate.
I think you're just butthurt that Mann is such a success, while the people you worship are all frauds and incompetents. Mann's
success makes your side's faceplants look that much more pathetic, so you've been instructed to let the hate flow, and to lie like you've never lied before.
And no, Mann did not use upside down data. That's a fake story that your cult pushed.
Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust
McIntyre and McKitrick (1) raise no valid issues regarding our paper. We specifically discussed divergence of “composite plus scale” (CPS) and “error-in-variables” (EIV) reconstructions before A.D. 1000 [ref. 2 and supporting information (SI) therein] and demonstrated (in the SI) that the EIV...
Tiljander
Note (September 8, 2016): The article below contains some false statements. I have overlined the false parts. See the discussion below for further information. Arthur Smith wrote about the Mann/Til…
"WAAAAAA! EVERYONE IS A LIAR BECAUSE MY CULT SAYS SO!"Because it's dishonest.......kind of Mann's thing, eh?
So you're claiming to be an expert, yet you don't know about the divergence problem. You're ignorant of the basics. That makes you uninteresting. All you bring to the discussion is butthurt, and that's boring.Really? You can measure trees rings going back hundreds.....thousands of years, but you can't measure them after 1998? DURR.
"WAAAAAA! EVERYONE IS A LIAR BECAUSE MY CULT SAYS SO!"
Cultists don't handle it well when you let reality leak into their SafeSpace.
So you're claiming to be an expert, yet you don't know about the divergence problem. You're ignorant of the basics. That makes you uninteresting. All you bring to the discussion is butthurt, and that's boring.
Now, how does your cult say to respond to that? You'd best run and check. While you're there, ask them why they lied about the upside-down thing.
Todd,
Why does Mann transitioning from tree ring data to thermometer data bother you? What about it do you consider dishonest? He clearly labeled his plots and explained what he was doing? Do you think he pushed some falsehood? What is the lie you believe he is putting out?
He did clearly label his plots and did explain what he was doing. Mike's Nature trick was a well known technique in the field and was never intended to push a falsehood. Along with everyone else involved in the production of the work of the IPCC, he DID share a Nobel prize. Your anger here seems really inappropriate. How could you possibly care about any of this? Does his transitioning from tree ring to thermometer affect your day to day life in any way? Have you had to explain Mann's comments about the Nobel prize to your young child? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot dude. Why do you care about any of this? Do you think that if Mann could be shown to have incorrectly made that transition and to have had nothing to do with the IPCC's Nobel, that AGW theory would collapse? That governments would stop moving away from fossil fuels? You've worked yourself into a tizzy about a complete nothing burger.
Did Michael Mann really win a Nobel Prize?
What's that got to do with the science?That reminds me, how's Mann doing in court?
What's that got to do with the science?
Seriously? Made up charts now?He didn't?
Seriously? Made up charts now?
