Bombshell study concludes there is no evidence for anthropogenic climate change...

[Toddsterpatriot]

That is nothing fake about the hockey stick graph.

You like mann's hockey stick?

He didn't leave anything out?

Didn't put any bad data in?

Adding real temps to proxy temps doesn't bother you?

So, Todd, what is your problem with Dr Mann?

What's not to like?

He tried to stop people he disagreed with from getting published, lied about the Nobel and still owes legal fees to a couple a guys he sued.

He's swell!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What other data of his do you believe to be fake? You claimed he would not reveal it but I showed you that he had released all of it years ago.

He should have told that to the judge, maybe he wouldn't have had his court cases tossed?

 

[Concerned American]

If you are looking for information about global warming, there is no place better than the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) at www.ipcc.ch. The Summary for Policy Makers

Yeah, that's what I want to do, follow "the science." FOR POLICY MAKERS. You're a moron who cannot understand that the end game is "population control." Fuck off lemming, you're an idiot.

 

[Crick]

Yeah, that's what I want to do, follow "the science." FOR POLICY MAKERS. You're a moron who cannot understand that the end game is "population control." Fuck off lemming, you're an idiot.

What's "end game" do you believe to be population control?

 

[alang1216]

Thanks for the confirmation.

And thank you for your confirmation that you don't get your climatology information from climatology scientists.

 

[Concerned American]

And thank you for your confirmation that you don't get your climatology information from climatology scientists.

Comprehension isn't big on your list either. However you DID comfirm that you are a leftist moron.

 

[alang1216]

Comprehension isn't big on your list either. However you DID comfirm that you are a leftist moron.

It is obvious you are a rightist, but I'm still awaiting evidence of intelligence...

 

[Concerned American]

It is obvious you are a rightist, but I'm still awaiting evidence of intelligence...

You'll never be able to recognize that which you are devoid of.

 

[mamooth]

Adding real temps to proxy temps doesn't bother you?

Why would it bother any honest person?

Proxy temps don't extend to the present. Thermometer temps don't extend to the distant past. It's common sense and common practice to splice them together, using the overlap to calibrate.

I think you're just butthurt that Mann is such a success, while the people you worship are all frauds and incompetents. Mann's
success makes your side's faceplants look that much more pathetic, so you've been instructed to let the hate flow, and to lie like you've never lied before.

And no, Mann did not use upside down data. That's a fake story that your cult pushed.

Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust

McIntyre and McKitrick (1) raise no valid issues regarding our paper. We specifically discussed divergence of “composite plus scale” (CPS) and “error-in-variables” (EIV) reconstructions before A.D. 1000 [ref. 2 and supporting information (SI) therein] and demonstrated (in the SI) that the EIV...

www.pnas.org

Tiljander

Note (September 8, 2016): The article below contains some false statements. I have overlined the false parts. See the discussion below for further information. Arthur Smith wrote about the Mann/Til…

agwobserver.wordpress.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why would it bother any honest person?

Proxy temps don't extend to the present. Thermometer temps don't extend to the distant past. It's common sense and common practice to splice them together, using the overlap to calibrate.

I think you're just butthurt that Mann is such a success, while the people you worship are all frauds and incompetents. Mann's
success makes your side's faceplants look that much more pathetic, so you've been instructed to let the hate flow, and to lie like you've never lied before.

And no, Mann did not use upside down data. That's a fake story that your cult pushed.

Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust

McIntyre and McKitrick (1) raise no valid issues regarding our paper. We specifically discussed divergence of “composite plus scale” (CPS) and “error-in-variables” (EIV) reconstructions before A.D. 1000 [ref. 2 and supporting information (SI) therein] and demonstrated (in the SI) that the EIV...

www.pnas.org

Tiljander

Note (September 8, 2016): The article below contains some false statements. I have overlined the false parts. See the discussion below for further information. Arthur Smith wrote about the Mann/Til…

agwobserver.wordpress.com

Why would it bother any honest person?

Because it's dishonest.......kind of Mann's thing, eh?

Proxy temps don't extend to the present.

Really? You can measure trees rings going back hundreds.....thousands of years, but you can't measure them after 1998? DURR.

It's common sense and common practice to splice them together, using the overlap to calibrate.

And when they start to diverge.......you lie.

I think you're just butthurt that Mann is such a success,

Yeah, they'll never take away his Nobel Prize.........

Mann's success makes your side's faceplants look that much more pathetic,

How are his courtroom successes looking?

 

[mamooth]

Because it's dishonest.......kind of Mann's thing, eh?

"WAAAAAA! EVERYONE IS A LIAR BECAUSE MY CULT SAYS SO!"

Cultists don't handle it well when you let reality leak into their SafeSpace.

Really? You can measure trees rings going back hundreds.....thousands of years, but you can't measure them after 1998? DURR.

So you're claiming to be an expert, yet you don't know about the divergence problem. You're ignorant of the basics. That makes you uninteresting. All you bring to the discussion is butthurt, and that's boring.

Now, how does your cult say to respond to that? You'd best run and check. While you're there, ask them why they lied about the upside-down thing.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

"WAAAAAA! EVERYONE IS A LIAR BECAUSE MY CULT SAYS SO!"

Cultists don't handle it well when you let reality leak into their SafeSpace.


So you're claiming to be an expert, yet you don't know about the divergence problem. You're ignorant of the basics. That makes you uninteresting. All you bring to the discussion is butthurt, and that's boring.

Now, how does your cult say to respond to that? You'd best run and check. While you're there, ask them why they lied about the upside-down thing.

"WAAAAAA! EVERYONE IS A LIAR BECAUSE MY CULT SAYS SO!"

Did Michael Mann really win a Nobel Prize?

So you're claiming to be an expert, yet you don't know about the divergence problem.

You mean proxies don't work now because.............?

All you bring to the discussion is butthurt

That reminds me, how's Mann doing in court?

 

[Crick]

Todd,

Why does Mann transitioning from tree ring data to thermometer data bother you? What about it do you consider dishonest? He clearly labeled his plots and explained what he was doing? Do you think he pushed some falsehood? What is the lie you believe he is putting out?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Todd,

Why does Mann transitioning from tree ring data to thermometer data bother you? What about it do you consider dishonest? He clearly labeled his plots and explained what he was doing? Do you think he pushed some falsehood? What is the lie you believe he is putting out?

Transitioning? LOL!

He clearly labeled his plots and explained what he was doing?

He clearly explained "Mike's Nature Trick", on the chart?

Do you think he pushed some falsehood?

Was "sharing a Nobel Peace Prize"......truthful?

 

[Crick]

He did clearly label his plots and did explain what he was doing. Mike's Nature trick was a well known technique in the field and was never intended to push a falsehood. Along with everyone else involved in the production of the work of the IPCC, he DID share a Nobel prize. Your anger here seems really inappropriate. How could you possibly care about any of this? Does his transitioning from tree ring to thermometer affect your day to day life in any way? Have you had to explain Mann's comments about the Nobel prize to your young child? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot dude. Why do you care about any of this? Do you think that if Mann could be shown to have incorrectly made that transition and to have had nothing to do with the IPCC's Nobel, that AGW theory would collapse? That governments would stop moving away from fossil fuels? You've worked yourself into a tizzy about a complete nothing burger.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

He did clearly label his plots and did explain what he was doing. Mike's Nature trick was a well known technique in the field and was never intended to push a falsehood. Along with everyone else involved in the production of the work of the IPCC, he DID share a Nobel prize. Your anger here seems really inappropriate. How could you possibly care about any of this? Does his transitioning from tree ring to thermometer affect your day to day life in any way? Have you had to explain Mann's comments about the Nobel prize to your young child? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot dude. Why do you care about any of this? Do you think that if Mann could be shown to have incorrectly made that transition and to have had nothing to do with the IPCC's Nobel, that AGW theory would collapse? That governments would stop moving away from fossil fuels? You've worked yourself into a tizzy about a complete nothing burger.

He did clearly label his plots and did explain what he was doing.

Link?

Along with everyone else involved in the production of the work of the IPCC, he DID share a Nobel prize.

That's weird, he's not on the list of Nobel laureates.

Your anger here seems really inappropriate.

Anger? Where?

Does his transitioning from tree ring to thermometer affect your day to day life in any way?

Don't scientific lies affect your life?

Do you think that if Mann could be shown to have incorrectly made that transition

He didn't?

 

[mamooth]

Did Michael Mann really win a Nobel Prize?

It's not just your butthurt driving you. Cults need enemies for the faithful to hate. Since your fraud cult is dying, they _really_ need enemies.

That reminds me, how's Mann doing in court?

What's that got to do with the science?

If you could debate the science, you would. You can't. That's why you're in constant deflection mode.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What's that got to do with the science?

You're the one whining about butthurt.......Mann pay those legal fees yet? LOL!

 

[mamooth]

He didn't?

Seriously? Made up charts now?

Admit it. You have no idea what the trick was. You're as clueless about that as you are about every aspect of the scinece. You just bleat what you're told to bleat.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Seriously? Made up charts now?

Seriously.

Added proxy data and real data.....to "hide the decline". DURR.