Bombshell claims in Jack Smith's new filing

[JohnDB]

Oops, you didn't say why again.

I'm not watching a video you didn't watch. Sorry.

I did....it's a video of the appellate court interviewing the PA. And she has no viable answers.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I did....it's a video of the appellate court interviewing the PA. And she has no viable answers.

That doesn't render indictments to be fabricated.

So the whole thing is a bizarre lie.

Figgers.

 

[JohnDB]

That doesn't render indictments to be fabricated.

So the whole thing is a bizarre lie.

Figgers.

Actually it does. The legal premise for the fraud has to be established. Fraud has very specific elements that must be made....no different from a contract.
And the basis for those elements were never proven.

 

[lennypartiv]

The OP clearly has TDS.

 

[Nostra]

The OP clearly has TDS.

……and no BOMBSHELL!