Boasberg escalates contempt inquiry over Alien Enemies Act deportations

I love how you guys blather about (il)legal orders, while at the same time rejecting the process by which the legality of orders is established.

There's a name for a government that has one branch that makes the law, executes the law and determine the legality of those laws. It's called autocracy.

I am mocking the Seditious Six Democrats who tried to get the military to defy orders.
 
I am mocking the Seditious Six Democrats who tried to get the military to defy orders.
Oh, I see... cute. So you tried to derail the OP by posing a red herring?

Out of curiosity. Anything about the actual subject discussed in the OP you want to add?
 
Quit being a troll. Your comments are ridiculous.
Oh, I'm sorry. I figured you were flirting with me.

Let me tell you though. As long as we are on the subject of trolls. Calling someone a "moron", and telling them to "go **** themselves" , might be the intellectual level you use in whatever hovel you live. But I have a rule.

If you can't take it, don't diss it out.

And in my case. I'm neither insecure nor uninformed enough for you to rattle or make me upset.
 
Last edited:
Didn't the SC tell this dude to get your ass back in the corner? Trump has no obligations to comply with anything issued by this leftist judge as his orders are deemed illegal by the SC.
 
Boasberg should be impeached.
That's what he wants. Don't give dimocrap FILTH a Platform to scream their lies (through a friendly DISGUSTING FILTH of the media) to The People.

Ignore him. Let him choke on his bile. I mean, what's he gonna do? He has no arrest power, he has no real power and if he can get a US Attorney to risk his career and take up the case, Trump can, and WILL, Pardon the victim of the dimocrap scum National Socialists.

They WANT that piece of shit impeached. Don't give them what they want
 
Oh, I'm sorry. I figured you were flirting with me.

Let me tell you though. As long as we are on the subject of trolls. Calling someone a "moron", and telling them to "go **** themselves" , might be the intellectual level you use in whatever hovel you live. But I have a rule.

If you can't take it, don't diss it out.

And in my case. I'm neither insecure nor uninformed enough for you to rattle or make me upset.
Don't overrate yourself, you are very uninformed.
 
The moment the liberal's hero wife beating human trafficker was signed over to a foreign government, any further action is a matter of foreign policy outside the purview of the American judiciary. This activist judge is the one overstepping when his 'orders' interfere with foreign policy, which the Constitution grants such powers to the Executive.
 
What if the court order is not legal upon examination ?

Then you comply with the order until such time as you file an appeal to the next higher court and that court stays the order. Because it's their examination that matters.

WW
 
Boasberg is not an immigration judge and should stay in his own lane.

Correct. He's an Article III judge confirmed by the Senate, whereas an Immigration Judge is no a Senate confirmable judge, they are employees of the DOJ. In otherwords employees of the Executive Branch under the President and Attorney General, Immigration Judges are not part of the Judicial Branch.

WEW
 
Then you comply with the order until such time as you file an appeal to the next higher court and that court stays the order. Because it's their examination that matters.

WW
Do you have a degree in law?
 
He looks like a ghoul and hunts like a witch
 
He was appointed as a federal judge. This means his judgements are binding. This includes binding to the executive branch.

Again, if you want a government that has only one branch of government without any checks N-Korea is lovely this time of year I heard.
A federal judge holds more power than the President of the United States, elected by the people?

That doesn’t sound right.
 
15th post
A federal judge holds more power than the President of the United States, elected by the people?

That doesn’t sound right.
It doesn't? In my view it sounds a hell of a lot more "right' than the notion that one branch of the government has the power to simply ignore an entire other branch.

It's of course also all bullshit. See, nobody is disputing the right for the executive branch to enact laws. Simply the right to enact those laws prior the judicial weighing in if those laws are properly enacted when disputes arise.

It's interesting how so many people on a political forum all of a sudden develop amnesia as to how the separation of powers work.
 
It doesn't? In my view it sounds a hell of a lot more "right' than the notion that one branch of the government has the power to simply ignore an entire other branch.

It's of course also all bullshit. See, nobody is disputing the right for the executive branch to enact laws. Simply the right to enact those laws prior the judicial weighing in if those laws are properly enacted when disputes arise.

It's interesting how so many people on a political forum all of a sudden develop amnesia as to how the separation of powers work.
You don't have a clue.
 
It doesn't? In my view it sounds a hell of a lot more "right' than the notion that one branch of the government has the power to simply ignore an entire other branch.

It's of course also all bullshit. See, nobody is disputing the right for the executive branch to enact laws. Simply the right to enact those laws prior the judicial weighing in if those laws are properly enacted when disputes arise.

It's interesting how so many people on a political forum all of a sudden develop amnesia as to how the separation of powers work.
So ONE unelected individual has more power than the duly-elected President of the U.S.?

And even if we are going with your logic, you’re giving more power to one branch - the one that wants to fight too keep illegal lowlifes in this country, causing harm to honest Americans.
 
You don't have a clue.
I have plenty of clues. My clues about you for instance, are the fact that besides claims I'm wrong and a fascination with my sexual gratification you offer no actual counter-arguments.

Meaning you likely have none.
 
Back
Top Bottom