Blumenthal, The Liar, Says He Won't Legitimize Barrett's Nomination

[Crepitus]

He is right. According to McConnell’s rule of 2016 ....and Republican statements.

Oh come on, do you have no opinion on BIDEN who was against it, then for it, now against it again in a FLIP FLOP FLIP?? Obama and Biden tried to do the exact same thing, replace a conservative justice with a liberal justice. The ONLY difference is that Trump will succeed where Biden and Obama failed so Dems are wailing and crying foul. ENOUGH with the Dem's phony faux rage.

oh...hold on a second...you just made a MASSIVE goalpost move. So it is now about replacing a conservative with a conservative? Is this another one of those new McConnell rules?

You need get your excuses straight.

That is an impossible task. They have far too many excuses to keep them straight.

We don't need excuses we control the Senate and White House so suck it. And don't pretend for one second that Dems would do it any different if they had control.

More lame excuse making.

You're sounding pretty desperate.

 

[BluesLegend]

He is right. According to McConnell’s rule of 2016 ....and Republican statements.

Oh come on, do you have no opinion on BIDEN who was against it, then for it, now against it again in a FLIP FLOP FLIP?? Obama and Biden tried to do the exact same thing, replace a conservative justice with a liberal justice. The ONLY difference is that Trump will succeed where Biden and Obama failed so Dems are wailing and crying foul. ENOUGH with the Dem's phony faux rage.

oh...hold on a second...you just made a MASSIVE goalpost move. So it is now about replacing a conservative with a conservative? Is this another one of those new McConnell rules?

You need get your excuses straight.

That is an impossible task. They have far too many excuses to keep them straight.

We don't need excuses we control the Senate and White House so suck it. And don't pretend for one second that Dems would do it any different if they had control.

More lame excuse making.

You're sounding pretty desperate.

You are retarded. I summarized.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

He is right. According to McConnell’s rule of 2016 ....and Republican statements.

Blumenthal’s not the problem...you lot are.

What every Republican senator has said about filling a Supreme Court vacancy in an election year

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death leaves a vacancy on the Supreme Court just before the presidential election, as Justice Antonin Scalia's did in 2016, when Barack Obama was president. Here’s what Senate Republicans said in 2016, and what they’ve said publicly now.

www.pbs.org

Bullshit.

Everyone knows what 2016 was about.

Why don't you do some real reading before posting and making an ass of yourself.

Lol, everyone's except you apparently.

Sorry chump,

You're out.

She's in.

Suffer.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

He is right. According to McConnell’s rule of 2016 ....and Republican statements.

Oh come on, do you have no opinion on BIDEN who was against it, then for it, now against it again in a FLIP FLOP FLIP?? Obama and Biden tried to do the exact same thing, replace a conservative justice with a liberal justice. The ONLY difference is that Trump will succeed where Biden and Obama failed so Dems are wailing and crying foul. ENOUGH with the Dem's phony faux rage.

oh...hold on a second...you just made a MASSIVE goalpost move. So it is now about replacing a conservative with a conservative? Is this another one of those new McConnell rules?

You need get your excuses straight.

That is an impossible task. They have far too many excuses to keep them straight.

We don't need excuses we control the Senate and White House so suck it. And don't pretend for one second that Dems would do it any different if they had control.

More lame excuse making.

You're sounding pretty desperate.

You are retarded. I summarized.

You nailed it.

When you own the WH and the senate, you have no impediments to confirmation.

Mitch should have kept his mouth shut.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[JWBooth]

He is right. According to McConnell’s rule of 2016 ....and Republican statements.

Blumenthal’s not the problem...you lot are.

What every Republican senator has said about filling a Supreme Court vacancy in an election year

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death leaves a vacancy on the Supreme Court just before the presidential election, as Justice Antonin Scalia's did in 2016, when Barack Obama was president. Here’s what Senate Republicans said in 2016, and what they’ve said publicly now.

www.pbs.org

Bullshit.

Everyone knows what 2016 was about.

Why don't you do some real reading before posting and making an ass of yourself.

Yes. It was about preventing a president from legitimately filling a vacancy by creating a brand new “rule” that was promptly abandoned in 2020. I don’t know why you act ignorant.

 

[JWBooth]

The bitch from Hawaii is not going to see her either.

But, at least she didn't demonstrate her stupidity.

Back in the 70’s I dropped $20 on Maisy when she was doing short times in an alley off Hotel Street in Honolulu. Presumably for tuition money.


Not that I’d ever tell a sea story.

 

[Zorro!]

This fucker lied about going to Vietnam...repeatedly. And never apologized for it.

Now he says Barrett's nomination is not legitimate.

There is nothing unconstitutional about what is happening.

When this fucker dies, I'll piss on his grave too. And might even take a shit on it.

Hirono, Blumenthal say they won’t meet with Amy Coney Barrett

Two Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have said they will not meet with Amy Coney Barrett -- President Trump’s pick to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com

Does he go to a mortician for his make up?
Democrat Senators threaten to riot on the Senate floor. They know they are losing.

NORMS: “Interviews with more than a dozen Democrat senators revealed broad support for disrupting the Supreme Court confirmation process, even if the strategy yields some collateral damage.”

Dems seem to enjoy collateral damage, though it does not seem to slack their blood lust.

Yet Democrats facing tough reelections and those who typically spurn delay tactics overwhelmingly support the hardball campaign, potentially putting them at increased risk of losing their seats. 'We know that the votes are not there to block the nominee, but you do what you can to call attention to it,' said Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent who could be pulled off the campaign trail as a result. 'The issue is that this is a power grab.' Awesome, he's ready fall on his sword.

Politico reports.

"f Schumer develops a cohesive strategy and has the support of the entire Senate Democratic Caucus, it could quickly become one of the most disruptive series of delay tactics in recent memory."

Death throes.

 

[basquebromance]

what the left did to Kavanaugh and are doing to Barrett will inject political steroids into tens of millions of conservatives

good luck in your next election, Blumenthal!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Blumenthall is a fool.

 

[Nostra]

This fucker lied about going to Vietnam...repeatedly. And never apologized for it.

Now he says Barrett's nomination is not legitimate.

There is nothing unconstitutional about what is happening.

When this fucker dies, I'll piss on his grave too. And might even take a shit on it.

Hirono, Blumenthal say they won’t meet with Amy Coney Barrett

Two Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have said they will not meet with Amy Coney Barrett -- President Trump’s pick to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com

I can't believe this stolen valor fuckwit is taken seriously by anyone.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

This fucker lied about going to Vietnam...repeatedly. And never apologized for it.

Now he says Barrett's nomination is not legitimate.

There is nothing unconstitutional about what is happening.

When this fucker dies, I'll piss on his grave too. And might even take a shit on it.

Hirono, Blumenthal say they won’t meet with Amy Coney Barrett

Two Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have said they will not meet with Amy Coney Barrett -- President Trump’s pick to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com

Get in line.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

He is right. According to McConnell’s rule of 2016 ....and Republican statements.

Blumenthal’s not the problem...you lot are.

You're a moron. There are many, many historical precedents for doing what Trump is doing.
"There have been 29 times a vacancy opened during an election year or prior to an inauguration. Twenty-nine times. That's a lot," Mr. Trump told a crowd of supporters in North Carolina on Saturday. "Every single time, the sitting president made a nomination. That included — did you ever hear of George Washington? Did you ever hear of Thomas Jefferson? Or how about the great Abraham Lincoln?"


If the gutless liar Richard Blumenthal wants to grandstand and make as ass of himself I doubt the world
will stop for his little display of corrupt virtue signaling. All the democrats can boycott the hearings
and process of adding Amy Barrett to the Supreme Court for all most people care.
It will only make the whole thing go faster and smoother.

 

[Nostra]

He is right. According to McConnell’s rule of 2016 ....and Republican statements.

Blumenthal’s not the problem...you lot are.

What every Republican senator has said about filling a Supreme Court vacancy in an election year

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death leaves a vacancy on the Supreme Court just before the presidential election, as Justice Antonin Scalia's did in 2016, when Barack Obama was president. Here’s what Senate Republicans said in 2016, and what they’ve said publicly now.

www.pbs.org

You colossal ignorance of American history aside..................

YOUR side is full of massive hypocrites.

 

[BS Filter]

Blumenthal is a typical lying phony baloney Democrat.

 

[Nostra]

Blumenthal is a typical lying phony baloney Democrat.

And a Stolen Valor fuckwit. He shouldn't be able to serve in Congress, IMO.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Blumenthal a bloomin’ idiot | Power Line

www.powerlineblog.com

 

[22lcidw]

Yup, she's in. No disagreement there.

Hey at least you know what "rule" I'm referring to.

No, honey.

Harry Reid started this riot.

You may thank him in your prayers or drop some flowers on his grave.

Nuclear option.

I am voting Trump. But asses like Reid and others over the years have screwed things up. Two parties with one of them controlled by its furthest left side it can get to and the other at times helping to grease its wheels and when they don't are accosted, threatened, injured and soon maybe killed by the minions of the Prog socialists who have been triggered. The Prog politicians showing no remorse. Just for the attacks on the Repub politicians the las few years would be enough to vote the new justice in.

 

[my2¢]

Nothing illegal, only the standard hypocrisy from both sides. It sure is nice being politically independent which offers the ability to keep the same opinion from 4 years ago.