Blue states sue USDA for merely ASKING how many illegals are getting food stamps (SNAP)

Wow, dude, you have some dark fantasies.

Here's how it's going to play out. When Trump tanks the economy, all these dumb people who voted for him are going to turn on him. If his own party doesn't have the good sense to invoke the 25th Amendment on him, the Democrats will retake congress and neuter him. By 2028, the GOP brand will be so deep in the toilet you'll never see the light of day again.
Your the side that openly fantasizes about killing the children of political opponents and murders free speech advocates, don’t try that concern trolling horseshit here.
 
Your the side that openly fantasizes about killing the children of political opponents and murders free speech advocates, don’t try that concern trolling horseshit here.
Unfortunately, there are growing numbers on the left who only understand violence. The only way to reach them is a bullet to the neck.
 
Wow, dude, you have some dark fantasies.

Here's how it's going to play out. When Trump tanks the economy, all these dumb people who voted for him are going to turn on him. If his own party doesn't have the good sense to invoke the 25th Amendment on him, the Democrats will retake congress and neuter him. By 2028, the GOP brand will be so deep in the toilet you'll never see the light of day again.
donny-strokes-out-again-on-national-television-v0-v0j6hfc49qzf1.jpeg
Trump strokes out on national television
 
Actually, it says exactly that.

Anyone born here is a citizen.
No it doesn’t, if it did why wouldn’t have applied to Indians, the author even said it applies only to citizens and not invaders.
 
Doesn’t apply to illegals.

A baby isn't "illegal". If it's born here, it gets all the rights any other baby gets.

No it doesn’t, if it did why wouldn’t have applied to Indians, the author even said it applies only to citizens and not invaders.

Well, first, Indians at that time had their own Treaty Nations with the US.

Secondly, an invader is part of an organized army, not disorganized people from multiple nations, often trying to get away from their own government.

Third, the Author should have written down explicitly that "illegals" were excluded. The problem was at the time, there was no such thing as an "illegal". You got here, you were golden.

This was all litigated with Wong v. US.
 
This was all litigated with Wong v. US.

It needs to be revisited.

Regardless, we all know that the founders didn’t foresee the situation we have now. Birthright citizenship makes absolutely no sense in today’s environment. To prove the point, what if 250 years from now the US became the most populous country in the world who could barely feed its people. Would it still make sense to give food and benefits to people born on US soil from a mother who illegally snuck into the country? What about someone just visiting?
 
15th post
It needs to be revisited.

Regardless, we all know that the founders didn’t foresee the situation we have now. Birthright citizenship makes absolutely no sense in today’s environment. To prove the point, what if 250 years from now the US became the most populous country in the world who could barely feed its people. Would it still make sense to give food and benefits to people born on US soil from a mother who illegally snuck into the country? What about someone just visiting?

Well, the 14th Amendment wasn't written by the Founding Slave Rapists. It was written because the guys who bea,ed about "All Men are Created Equal" still allowed for slavery, which is why we needed three Amendments to fix that.

In 1865, there was really no "immigration" issue. We WANTED immigration. We had all this land (once we got done genociding the Native Americans), and we wanted people to work it for us. We didn't start trying to restrict immigration until non-white people started showing up. (And by that, I mean even Italians weren't considered "White enough".)

The reason why Wong's case became an issue was that they tried to restrict Chinese immigration.

I doubt there will be a United States 250 years from now. If we are truly blessed, we will have a single world government like the Federation in Star Trek. More likely, we'll break up into smaller countries at some point.
 
Well, the 14th Amendment wasn't written by the Founding Slave Rapists. It was written because the guys who bea,ed about "All Men are Created Equal" still allowed for slavery, which is why we needed three Amendments to fix that.

In 1865, there was really no "immigration" issue. We WANTED immigration. We had all this land (once we got done genociding the Native Americans), and we wanted people to work it for us. We didn't start trying to restrict immigration until non-white people started showing up. (And by that, I mean even Italians weren't considered "White enough".)

The reason why Wong's case became an issue was that they tried to restrict Chinese immigration.

I doubt there will be a United States 250 years from now. If we are truly blessed, we will have a single world government like the Federation in Star Trek. More likely, we'll break up into smaller countries at some point.
Idiot ^^^
 
Your the side that openly fantasizes about killing the children of political opponents and murders free speech advocates, don’t try that concern trolling horseshit here.

Um, Kirk was shot by a guy from a Conservative Mormon Family of gun fetishists... go talk with them.

As for the guy in VA, he was making a point that Republicans are just fine with other people's kids being killed in mass shootings.
 
"...from a family..." What an asshole. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom