Blowing Up Darwin

[Hollie]

At least you admit it!

At least you admit you're wrong.

 

[Robert W]

Yours is a common tactic of ID’iot creationers / Watchtower groupies. You literally know nothing of science which is why you don’t understand the Theory of Evolution never addressed the beginning of life.

Your excuse is you are not educated on this topic.

 

[Robert W]

You are hostile to nature. You are a product of fear and superstition as a part of your religious extremism.

How can you possibly think your arguments are valid? Your tactic is not science, it is attacks on the posters here who you believe can't join you in your religious tirades. They are not thinking in religious terms.

 

[Hollie]

How can you possibly think your arguments are valid? Your tactic is not science, it is attacks on the posters here who you believe can't join you in your religious tirades. They are not thinking in religious terms.

This is a message board. Did you really presume everyone would agree with you?

 

[Robert W]

This is a message board. Did you really presume everyone would agree with you?

OF course not. Same question back to you.

 

[Robert W]

Such are the failures of graduates from the Watchtower and Bible tract madrassah

You would need to discuss that with my dead vanished former wife and her children who believe that nonsense. I used to argue with the Jehovah Witnesses, not take their word for things.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The evidence is on my side: Darwin's presumptions are false.

Hahaha... how embarrassing for you.

Wake up and see your lot in life.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I used to argue with the Jehovah Witnesses, not take their word for things.

Because someone else brainwashed you first.

Else.you would be knocking on doors with them.

 

[Robert W]

Because someone else brainwashed you first.

Else.you would be knocking on doors with them.

That sounds like something you do.
You amuse me for you really come up with boneheaded ideas.

 

[Hollie]

OF course not. Same question back to you.

the difference is, I presented verifiable, peer review data. You offered nothing by vaucous claims to gods.

 

[Robert W]

Because someone else brainwashed you first.

Else.you would be knocking on doors with them.

That sounds like something you do.
You amuse me for you really come up with boneheaded ideas.

The evidence is on my side: Darwin's presumptions are false.


Watch me prove it.


First, 'evolving' suggests changing, in this case from the simple to the more advanced and complex organism. Outside of the kind of simple faith of peasants, science requires physical proof...in this sphere, that of the fossil record.

Evolution theory, sadly, falls short in that respect.



1. Even the fossil record definitively rejects the concept of speciation. There is absolutely no sign in the record of the countless intermediate species that should have once lived according to Darwinism. It has now been acknowledged that Darwin's claim that these fossils would be found in the future is definitely incorrect. http://www.nationalacademyofsciencesrefuted.com/regarding_speciation.php

a. “He [Darwin] prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search….It has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction was wrong.” (Eldridge, Niles, The Myths of Human Evolution, 1984, pp.45-46.)

b. "The difficulty of understanding the absence of vast pile of fossiliferous strata, which on my theory were no doubt somewhere accumulated before the [Cambrian] epoch, is very great. I allude to the manner in which numbers of species of the same group suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rock."
Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p. 306-307.


2. The discovery of the Burgess Shale deposits pretty much nailed it. The significance of the Burgess Shale discoveries is that the many new body plans show disparity, major differences that separate phyla, classes and orders ....and careful study of earlier fossils did not reveal any evolutionary trail!

a. "During this explosion of fauna, representatives of about twenty of the roughly twenty-six total phyla present in the known fossil record made their first appearance on earth." Meyers, "Darwin's Doubt," p. 31.

b. " To the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer..... The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained. " Charles Darwin On the Sudden Appearance of Groups of Allied Species in the Lowest Known Fossiliferous Strata - Collection at Bartleby.com



This is where you lie and scream "is not!!! Is notttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't worry. If they locate their brains, they might make a tiny bit of sense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That sounds like something you do.
You amuse me for you really come up with boneheaded ideas.

This low IQ outburst isn't going to help you.

If they had gotten to your little child brain first, they would have brainwashed you first.

And you would be singing the praises of jehovah right now.

 

[Robert W]

the difference is, I presented verifiable, peer review data. You offered nothing by vaucous claims to gods.

Whose pals are you citing? Funny how you say gods so much I am amused.

 

[Robert W]

This low IQ outburst isn't going to help you.

If they had gotten to your little child brain first, they would have brainwashed you first.

And you would be singing the praises of jehovah right now.

You are insane. How many believe you? Who is in your cult?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You are insane. How many believe you? Who is in your cult?

This terrible acting isn't going to help you.

And evolution remains a fact.

 

[Robert W]

the difference is, I presented verifiable, peer review data. You offered nothing by vaucous claims to gods.

Peers once declared the Sun revolves around Earth.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Peers once declared the Sun revolves around Earth.

That's not peer review of science. That's an irrelevant red herring.

 

[Robert W]

This terrible acting isn't going to help you.

And evolution remains a fact.

Even Darwin did not prove that. I said over and over, I happen to believe in evolution. Then I defined it. It only means living things change. It says nothing about the origins of life.

 

[Robert W]

That's not peer review of science. That's an irrelevant red herring.

Your spin is so fake nobody believes you.

 

[Robert W]

That's not peer review of science. That's an irrelevant red herring.

So you admit that peers do not matter.