What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Blame the Video = Blame America

ScreamingEagle

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
13,399
Reaction score
1,706
Points
245
no matter how you cut it.....that's the bottom line with this Administration.....

Obama and his minions really do not want to blame Islam or Al Qaeda or those who are absolutely responsible for what went down in Benghazi.....so they will concoct any story to blame America first or anybody/anything else they can handily pin it on...this is not the first time this has happened......just whose side is Obama really on anyway.....? :mad:
 

BecauseIKnow

Rookie
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
11,294
Reaction score
439
Points
0
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?
 

Katzndogz

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
65,656
Reaction score
7,481
Points
1,830
The entire royal regime was quite clear in blaming the First Amendment, which is why there is a prisoner in Los Angeles incarcerated for what he allegedly said.
 
OP
ScreamingEagle

ScreamingEagle

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
13,399
Reaction score
1,706
Points
245
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

at least Bush didn't blame America....
 
Last edited:

BecauseIKnow

Rookie
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
11,294
Reaction score
439
Points
0
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

at least Bush didn't blame America....

I must have missed where Obama blamed America for the Libyan attack.
 

Sinjorri

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
2,037
Reaction score
267
Points
48
libs have no problem blaming america. they would vomit on our flag if given a chance.
 

Sinjorri

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
2,037
Reaction score
267
Points
48
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

oppps dems played that game with bush remember. So please stop the insanity.
 

beagle9

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
7,064
Points
280
no matter how you cut it.....that's the bottom line with this Administration.....

Obama and his minions really do not want to blame Islam or Al Qaeda or those who are absolutely responsible for what went down in Benghazi.....so they will concoct any story to blame America first or anybody/anything else they can handily pin it on...this is not the first time this has happened......just whose side is Obama really on anyway.....? :mad:
Watch 2016, and you will see whose side Obama is on and why... He can't help himself, and that is why we need to take this nation back from these kinds of anti-Americans, along with their idiot menions who follow them out of desperation for their singular causes, in which benefits no one but them in their selfishness, while the rest of the nation burns.
 

beagle9

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
7,064
Points
280
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?


Numbers mean nothing ever, because when it comes to a single death of an American at the hands of a terrorist, it is just as big a deal as if there was 3000, so what is your point in this type of spin ?

3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term.

Yes, and now go back and see why the buildings were attacked and how the security breach transpired over time, in which finally caused the deaths of 3000 Americans and some foriegners who were caught up in the situation that were found within the numbers as well. Bush just ended up being the clean up guy, for a mess Bill Clinton left for him after his (Clintons) administration paved the way for these things and/or attacks to finally reach the levels that they had reached in America, where as they then became a reality unfortunately all due to the democrats weakness in which they projected and fomented over time when they were holding office prior to Bush Jr, and on back it all goes.
 

BecauseIKnow

Rookie
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
11,294
Reaction score
439
Points
0
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?


Numbers mean nothing ever, because when it comes to a single death of an American at the hands of a terrorist, it is just as big a deal as if there was 3000, so what is your point in this type of spin ?

3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term.

Yes, and now go back and see why the buildings were attacked and how the security breach transpired over time, in which finally caused the deaths of 3000 Americans and some foriegners who were caught up in the situation that were found within the numbers as well. Bush just ended up being the clean up guy, for a mess Bill Clinton left for him after his (Clintons) administration paved the way for these things and/or attacks to finally reach the levels that they had reached in America, where as they then became a reality unfortunately all due to the democrats weakness in which they projected and fomented over time when they were holding office prior to Bush Jr, and on back it all goes.

Bush was warned multiple times. Yes it's a way bigger deal and its literally on our soil. Intelligence warned him many times.
 

Katzndogz

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
65,656
Reaction score
7,481
Points
1,830
Bush was warned of generalities. He was never told that on 9/11/01 20 men were going to fly planes into the Pentagon, the World Trade Center and possibly the capitol. The intelligence of the Libyan attack was that on 9/11/12, the Libyan consulate in Benghazi was going to come under attack.

That's the difference. It wasn't a general attack that something may happen, somewhere, by some means.
 

BecauseIKnow

Rookie
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
11,294
Reaction score
439
Points
0
Bush was warned of generalities. He was never told that on 9/11/01 20 men were going to fly planes into the Pentagon, the World Trade Center and possibly the capitol. The intelligence of the Libyan attack was that on 9/11/12, the Libyan consulate in Benghazi was going to come under attack.

That's the difference. It wasn't a general attack that something may happen, somewhere, by some means.

He was warned about AQ hijacking planes. If you're saying that the warnings for Libya was in general that means its because of the video.
 
OP
ScreamingEagle

ScreamingEagle

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
13,399
Reaction score
1,706
Points
245
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

at least Bush didn't blame America....

I must have missed where Obama blamed America for the Libyan attack.

White House defends UN ambassador over response to Benghazi attack | World news | guardian.co.uk
 

Charles_Main

AR15 Owner
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
16,692
Reaction score
2,248
Points
88
Location
Michigan, USA
no matter how you cut it.....that's the bottom line with this Administration.....

Obama and his minions really do not want to blame Islam or Al Qaeda or those who are absolutely responsible for what went down in Benghazi.....so they will concoct any story to blame America first or anybody/anything else they can handily pin it on...this is not the first time this has happened......just whose side is Obama really on anyway.....? :mad:

To be more Precise it's Blaming Free Speech.
 

Quantum Windbag

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
58,308
Reaction score
5,094
Points
245
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

Was 9/11/01 a security failure? Yes.
Was 9/11/12 a security failure? Yes.

What's your point, or are you still confused by the guy that liked to get fucked my pigs? Isn't there something in the Qur'an about the corkscrew making it a more stimulating?
 

BecauseIKnow

Rookie
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
11,294
Reaction score
439
Points
0

David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said on Sunday that Barack Obama had "100% confidence" in Rice, who initially described the Benghazi attack as a spontaneous assault in the wake of anti-US protests elsewhere in the Middle East.

That's different than blaming the video. The video certainly sparked protests around the Middle East. It might not have sparked the militant attack.
 

BecauseIKnow

Rookie
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
11,294
Reaction score
439
Points
0
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

Was 9/11/01 a security failure? Yes.
Was 9/11/12 a security failure? Yes.

What's your point, or are you still confused by the guy that liked to get fucked my pigs? Isn't there something in the Qur'an about the corkscrew making it a more stimulating?

Now yer cookin Nazi! Ha Ha Ha!
 

Charles_Main

AR15 Owner
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
16,692
Reaction score
2,248
Points
88
Location
Michigan, USA
The only people Obama does not want to Blame for anything, are the Intolerant, Anti Free Speech, anti womens rights, anti Gay, Anti Freedom of Religion, Violent, Radical Muslims who Want Blood over a video they did not even see till Barrack Obama's Administration Blamed a Terrorist Attack on it.
 
OP
ScreamingEagle

ScreamingEagle

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
13,399
Reaction score
1,706
Points
245

David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said on Sunday that Barack Obama had "100% confidence" in Rice, who initially described the Benghazi attack as a spontaneous assault in the wake of anti-US protests elsewhere in the Middle East.

That's different than blaming the video. The video certainly sparked protests around the Middle East. It might not have sparked the militant attack.

“In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated,” Rice said, referring to protests in Egypt Tuesday over a film that depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud. Protesters in Cairo breached the walls of the U.S. Embassy, tearing apart an American flag.

“We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to – or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo,” Rice said. “And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons… And it then evolved from there.”

what is it about "replicate" that is confusing to you.....?
 
Last edited:

BecauseIKnow

Rookie
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
11,294
Reaction score
439
Points
0

David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said on Sunday that Barack Obama had "100% confidence" in Rice, who initially described the Benghazi attack as a spontaneous assault in the wake of anti-US protests elsewhere in the Middle East.

That's different than blaming the video. The video certainly sparked protests around the Middle East. It might not have sparked the militant attack.

“In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated,” Rice said, referring to protests in Egypt Tuesday over a film that depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud. Protesters in Cairo breached the walls of the U.S. Embassy, tearing apart an American flag.

“We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to – or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo,” Rice said. “And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons… And it then evolved from there.”

what is it about "replicate" that is confusing to you.....?

Where am I confused? They were reactions to the video. The main protests. The intelligence community was still getting information on the militant attack.

The Intelligence said that at first, he was waiting for the intelligence.
 
Last edited:

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$191.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top