Blame the Video = Blame America

ScreamingEagle

Gold Member
Jul 5, 2004
13,399
1,706
245
no matter how you cut it.....that's the bottom line with this Administration.....

Obama and his minions really do not want to blame Islam or Al Qaeda or those who are absolutely responsible for what went down in Benghazi.....so they will concoct any story to blame America first or anybody/anything else they can handily pin it on...this is not the first time this has happened......just whose side is Obama really on anyway.....? :mad:
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?
 
The entire royal regime was quite clear in blaming the First Amendment, which is why there is a prisoner in Los Angeles incarcerated for what he allegedly said.
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

at least Bush didn't blame America....
 
Last edited:
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

at least Bush didn't blame America....

I must have missed where Obama blamed America for the Libyan attack.
 
libs have no problem blaming america. they would vomit on our flag if given a chance.
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

oppps dems played that game with bush remember. So please stop the insanity.
 
no matter how you cut it.....that's the bottom line with this Administration.....

Obama and his minions really do not want to blame Islam or Al Qaeda or those who are absolutely responsible for what went down in Benghazi.....so they will concoct any story to blame America first or anybody/anything else they can handily pin it on...this is not the first time this has happened......just whose side is Obama really on anyway.....? :mad:
Watch 2016, and you will see whose side Obama is on and why... He can't help himself, and that is why we need to take this nation back from these kinds of anti-Americans, along with their idiot menions who follow them out of desperation for their singular causes, in which benefits no one but them in their selfishness, while the rest of the nation burns.
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?


Numbers mean nothing ever, because when it comes to a single death of an American at the hands of a terrorist, it is just as big a deal as if there was 3000, so what is your point in this type of spin ?

3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term.

Yes, and now go back and see why the buildings were attacked and how the security breach transpired over time, in which finally caused the deaths of 3000 Americans and some foriegners who were caught up in the situation that were found within the numbers as well. Bush just ended up being the clean up guy, for a mess Bill Clinton left for him after his (Clintons) administration paved the way for these things and/or attacks to finally reach the levels that they had reached in America, where as they then became a reality unfortunately all due to the democrats weakness in which they projected and fomented over time when they were holding office prior to Bush Jr, and on back it all goes.
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?


Numbers mean nothing ever, because when it comes to a single death of an American at the hands of a terrorist, it is just as big a deal as if there was 3000, so what is your point in this type of spin ?

3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term.

Yes, and now go back and see why the buildings were attacked and how the security breach transpired over time, in which finally caused the deaths of 3000 Americans and some foriegners who were caught up in the situation that were found within the numbers as well. Bush just ended up being the clean up guy, for a mess Bill Clinton left for him after his (Clintons) administration paved the way for these things and/or attacks to finally reach the levels that they had reached in America, where as they then became a reality unfortunately all due to the democrats weakness in which they projected and fomented over time when they were holding office prior to Bush Jr, and on back it all goes.

Bush was warned multiple times. Yes it's a way bigger deal and its literally on our soil. Intelligence warned him many times.
 
Bush was warned of generalities. He was never told that on 9/11/01 20 men were going to fly planes into the Pentagon, the World Trade Center and possibly the capitol. The intelligence of the Libyan attack was that on 9/11/12, the Libyan consulate in Benghazi was going to come under attack.

That's the difference. It wasn't a general attack that something may happen, somewhere, by some means.
 
Bush was warned of generalities. He was never told that on 9/11/01 20 men were going to fly planes into the Pentagon, the World Trade Center and possibly the capitol. The intelligence of the Libyan attack was that on 9/11/12, the Libyan consulate in Benghazi was going to come under attack.

That's the difference. It wasn't a general attack that something may happen, somewhere, by some means.

He was warned about AQ hijacking planes. If you're saying that the warnings for Libya was in general that means its because of the video.
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

at least Bush didn't blame America....

I must have missed where Obama blamed America for the Libyan attack.

White House defends UN ambassador over response to Benghazi attack | World news | guardian.co.uk
 
no matter how you cut it.....that's the bottom line with this Administration.....

Obama and his minions really do not want to blame Islam or Al Qaeda or those who are absolutely responsible for what went down in Benghazi.....so they will concoct any story to blame America first or anybody/anything else they can handily pin it on...this is not the first time this has happened......just whose side is Obama really on anyway.....? :mad:

To be more Precise it's Blaming Free Speech.
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

Was 9/11/01 a security failure? Yes.
Was 9/11/12 a security failure? Yes.

What's your point, or are you still confused by the guy that liked to get fucked my pigs? Isn't there something in the Qur'an about the corkscrew making it a more stimulating?
 

David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said on Sunday that Barack Obama had "100% confidence" in Rice, who initially described the Benghazi attack as a spontaneous assault in the wake of anti-US protests elsewhere in the Middle East.

That's different than blaming the video. The video certainly sparked protests around the Middle East. It might not have sparked the militant attack.
 
Obviously you Republicans are a pack of sick liars who act concerned so you can defeat Obama. I mean this isn't the gazillionth time we heard about this. 3,000 Americans were killed under Bush's term. Not a security failure. 4 Americans killed in Libya. Huge anti American security failure, obviously Obama is a pro terrorist sympathizer, you know he's Muslim too!?

Was 9/11/01 a security failure? Yes.
Was 9/11/12 a security failure? Yes.

What's your point, or are you still confused by the guy that liked to get fucked my pigs? Isn't there something in the Qur'an about the corkscrew making it a more stimulating?

Now yer cookin Nazi! Ha Ha Ha!
 
The only people Obama does not want to Blame for anything, are the Intolerant, Anti Free Speech, anti womens rights, anti Gay, Anti Freedom of Religion, Violent, Radical Muslims who Want Blood over a video they did not even see till Barrack Obama's Administration Blamed a Terrorist Attack on it.
 

David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said on Sunday that Barack Obama had "100% confidence" in Rice, who initially described the Benghazi attack as a spontaneous assault in the wake of anti-US protests elsewhere in the Middle East.

That's different than blaming the video. The video certainly sparked protests around the Middle East. It might not have sparked the militant attack.

“In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated,” Rice said, referring to protests in Egypt Tuesday over a film that depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud. Protesters in Cairo breached the walls of the U.S. Embassy, tearing apart an American flag.

“We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to – or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo,” Rice said. “And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons… And it then evolved from there.”

what is it about "replicate" that is confusing to you.....?
 
Last edited:

David Plouffe, a senior White House adviser, said on Sunday that Barack Obama had "100% confidence" in Rice, who initially described the Benghazi attack as a spontaneous assault in the wake of anti-US protests elsewhere in the Middle East.

That's different than blaming the video. The video certainly sparked protests around the Middle East. It might not have sparked the militant attack.

“In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated,” Rice said, referring to protests in Egypt Tuesday over a film that depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud. Protesters in Cairo breached the walls of the U.S. Embassy, tearing apart an American flag.

“We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to – or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo,” Rice said. “And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons… And it then evolved from there.”

what is it about "replicate" that is confusing to you.....?

Where am I confused? They were reactions to the video. The main protests. The intelligence community was still getting information on the militant attack.

The Intelligence said that at first, he was waiting for the intelligence.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top