Zone1 Blacks should not resent other persecuted yet successful minorities but instead emulate their choices and actions that led to their success

So some antisemitic feminist had an opinion and wrote a book? You quoted from someone spewing her resentment toward Jews? And that’s your PROOF?

And you have been consistently shown that your opinion is untrue. The fact that you are unwilling to acknowledge that Jews‘ high priority for higher education, and their high educational attainment - accounts for their success, and insist on this “whitr privilege” crap is because you are unwilling to admit that people’s choices, values, and personal traits lead to success.

And the reason is obvious. if you give people credit for their own choices leading to their success, you’ve got to admit the opposite is true. And with you, it’s always got to be whitey’s fault.

As far as my telling you what to say to whites, I said to stop saying shut the fuck up. First, we are in Zone 1. Second, who are you yo tell whites what they can and cannot say? And third, you have comolained that whites have not spoken to you with the deference you think you are entitled to, and then you tell a white guy - a moderator yet - to STFU?

Decent people don’t tell others to STFU. And you’re doing is showing whitey that the rules don’t apply to you because you’re black and think that entitles you to special treatment.
I have not been proven wrong. You are here posting anti black filth and lies every day and it doesn't get closed or moved. What happened is documented.
1660253827400.png

In the wake of World War II, the horrors of Nazism were becoming public and publicly repudiated. Eugenics and political forms of institutional anti-Semitism lost much of their hold. A good economy and a progressive political climate enabled America to dismantle some aspects of legal discrimination and segregation. One result was that Ashkenazi Jews became white; for a while, in the ’50s, we even became a best-selling flavor of American popular culture. Those benefits weren’t extended to African Americans, Mexican Americans, Japanese Americans and other Asian Americans. Racism itself didn’t take a hit. The category of white just expanded to include Southern and Eastern Europeans. I figured it was permanent.


White Jews benefitted due to race. Fact. So live with it.

Blacks are the foundatiional advocates for public education in this country. It was newly freed slaves who initiated the fight for public education. When blacks were not admitted into white colleges, blacks built HBCU'S. So this is not abiut any of the crap you claim. Decent people don't keep extreme anti black lies in every post. The only people who have gotten special treatment in this country are whites and the fact you get to post this crap then get protected from being told what you are because rules get made to allow you to do this is an example of the privilege you say whites don't get.
 
Don't blacks lecture whites about their "sins"?
What whites have done and continue doing are actual human rights violations, not opinions based on ignorance and hate. End the whataboutism and start taking responsibility.
 
Last edited:
What whites have done and continue doing are actual human rights v opinions based on ignorance and hate. End the whataboutism and start taking responsibility.
No idiot.

You say whites should have no say about black behavior in the USA.

Fuck that. Your crime and culture affect every other race in the nation.

You have the LEAST right to lecture anyone else.

Your demands are irrelevant and no one cares
 
Last edited:
Or Japan, China, Thailand, Germany, France, Russia, Poland, Mexico, Peru should I go on? all those countries are far more racist than the USA.
There is no such thing as more racist. And most of those countries you name are not more racist if you want to put a measure on racism.
 
No idiot.

You say whites should have no say about black behavior in the USA.

Fuck that. Your crime and culture affect every other race in the nation.

You have the LEAST right to lecture anyone else.

Your demands are irrelevant and no one cares
Since whites commit the most crime, it affects the other cultures in America far more.

So it is you who has the least right to lecture.
 
Last edited:
I have not been proven wrong. You are here posting anti black filth and lies every day and it doesn't get closed or moved. What happened is documented.
View attachment 680863
In the wake of World War II, the horrors of Nazism were becoming public and publicly repudiated. Eugenics and political forms of institutional anti-Semitism lost much of their hold. A good economy and a progressive political climate enabled America to dismantle some aspects of legal discrimination and segregation. One result was that Ashkenazi Jews became white; for a while, in the ’50s, we even became a best-selling flavor of American popular culture. Those benefits weren’t extended to African Americans, Mexican Americans, Japanese Americans and other Asian Americans. Racism itself didn’t take a hit. The category of white just expanded to include Southern and Eastern Europeans. I figured it was permanent.


White Jews benefitted due to race. Fact. So live with it.

Blacks are the foundatiional advocates for public education in this country. It was newly freed slaves who initiated the fight for public education. When blacks were not admitted into white colleges, blacks built HBCU'S. So this is not abiut any of the crap you claim. Decent people don't keep extreme anti black lies in every post. The only people who have gotten special treatment in this country are whites and the fact you get to post this crap then get protected from being told what you are because rules get made to allow you to do this is an example of the privilege you say whites don't get.
Anti-black filth? Give me a break. (You’ve said awful things about Jews, bitching and complaining.)There is nothing awful about noting that the black underclass would help themselves via education and not having children out of wedlock. That’s filth?

It seems there’s an effort underway to paint anything other than full acceptance of poor lifestyle choices among blacks as “filth.” Nobody is falling for it.

And the Forward is a far-left rag, nearing socialism. I ignore their self-loathing nonsense.
 
What do you mean you can’t emulate Jews because the government gave choices to them and denied blacks? How many generations ago was THAT?

We are talking about NOW. You are given MORE than choices! You are given favoritism. Jews worked around quotas denying them a higher education, and NOW you not only are not faced with being blocked from higher education, but liberals are bending over backwards to deny entrance to Asians and whites to open up slots for blacks with worse grades and scores!

There is absolutely no excuse for any black not to AT LEAST get post-high school training of some sort - either at community college or a vocational program. Americans are even paying for it.

All I hear from you are excuses.
The only person making excuses is you. And your incessant whining avout anti semitism while you display extreme anti black hate is tired. Everything you say is a bunch of factless anti black hate filled load of extremist mumbo jumbo.

I have a college education and then some. I have far more intelligence and skill than you. I am punching down when I take the time to respond to the silly factless garbage you post.

Nobody is being blocked but non whites who aren't friends with college administrators or whose parents didn't attend an ivy league school.

All Rise!

Todays lesson:

STOP LYING ABOUT WHITES AND ASIANS GETTING PASSED OVER FOR BLACKS!

It's funny how extremists use Asians. And Asians don't like it.

Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. It is a case first filed in 2014.

In this case, the contention is that Asians are discriminated against based on the number of Asians turned down for Harvard admission. More than 30,000 students each year apply to Harvard. In 2019, there were 36,000 applicants for 1,600 slots. That meant 34,400 students of all races were not admitted. The claim is Asians get excluded to add black and Hispanic students. Ironically the claim is not made about Asians being passed over for white legacy students. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.”

It is time to look at the claim. The claim is that Asians are discriminated against in admissions. Harvard admission numbers do not support his claim. Asians are 6 percent of the American population, but they were 26 percent of the students entering Harvard in 2021. That is a full ten percentage points more than African Americans (15.9%) and more than double the percentage of both Hispanics(12.5%) and Native Americans(11%). In fact, there were more Asians admitted into Harvard than Hispanics and Native Americans combined. Additionally, a study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research revealed this:

“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each. Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs. Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”

Here, we see that whites are provided entry by a plethora of other preferences they would not qualify for if not for connections they have due to their race. The study shows that Asians are not adversely impacted because Harvard must admit blacks and Hispanics that are presumably unqualified. Instead, we see white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance who get accepted at more than double the percentage of Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans who meet the same criteria. Edward Blum and his fake Students for Fair Admissions “organization” have whined to the supreme court for years, bringing meritless garbage case after case. The facts plainly show that more unqualified white students are admitted into Harvard due to preferences they get that nonwhites would not. Those preferences are the real cause of whatever reduction in admissions that is claimed.

Equal protection means that government entities must treat all individuals the same when the circumstances or situations are the same. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.” The numbers show that when the circumstances and situations are the same, meaning ALDC preferences, 2.68 times more whites get admitted due to this preference than Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Judging by the Equal Protection clause, those same groups are not receiving equal protection as determined by the 14th Amendment relative to ALDC preferences.

STOP LYING ABOUT WHITES AND ASIANS GETTING PASSED OVER FOR BLACKS!

Ian Millhiser, The Supreme Court case that could end affirmative action, explained, Mar 2, 2021, The Supreme Court case that could end affirmative action, explained

Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, First Circuit Holds that Harvard’s Admissions Program Does Not Violate the Civil Rights Act., Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College

TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 42 U.S.C. § 2000D ET SEQ., Title VI Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 42 U.S.C. § 2000d Et Seq.

Russell W. Galloway Jr., Basic Equal Protection Analysis, 29 Santa Clara L. Rev. 121 (1989). Basic Equal Protection Analysis

The diverse demographics of Asian Americans, The diverse demographics of Asian Americans

Admissions Statistics, A Brief Profile of the Admitted Class of 2025, Harvard welcomes students from across the country and all over, Admissions Statistics

Daniella Silva, Study on Harvard finds 43 percent of white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff, Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

Peter Arcidiacono, Josh Kinsler, Tyler Ransom, National Bureau Of Economic Research, Legacy And Athlete Preferences At Harvard, Working Paper 26316, Legacy and Athlete Preferences at Harvard
 
The only person making excuses is you. And your incessant whining avout anti semitism while you display extreme anti black hate is tired. Everything you say is a bunch of factless anti black hate filled load of extremist mumbo jumbo.

I have a college education and then some. I have far more intelligence and skill than you. I am punching down when I take the time to respond to the silly factless garbage you post.

Nobody is being blocked but non whites who aren't friends with college administrators or whose parents didn't attend an ivy league school.

All Rise!

Todays lesson:

STOP LYING ABOUT WHITES AND ASIANS GETTING PASSED OVER FOR BLACKS!

It's funny how extremists use Asians. And Asians don't like it.

Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. It is a case first filed in 2014.

In this case, the contention is that Asians are discriminated against based on the number of Asians turned down for Harvard admission. More than 30,000 students each year apply to Harvard. In 2019, there were 36,000 applicants for 1,600 slots. That meant 34,400 students of all races were not admitted. The claim is Asians get excluded to add black and Hispanic students. Ironically the claim is not made about Asians being passed over for white legacy students. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.”

It is time to look at the claim. The claim is that Asians are discriminated against in admissions. Harvard admission numbers do not support his claim. Asians are 6 percent of the American population, but they were 26 percent of the students entering Harvard in 2021. That is a full ten percentage points more than African Americans (15.9%) and more than double the percentage of both Hispanics(12.5%) and Native Americans(11%). In fact, there were more Asians admitted into Harvard than Hispanics and Native Americans combined. Additionally, a study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research revealed this:

“Using publicly released reports, we examine the preferences Harvard gives for recruited athletes, legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC. Among admits who are African American, Asian American, and Hispanic, the share is less than 16% each. Our model of admissions shows that roughly three quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as white non-ALDCs. Removing preferences for athletes and legacies would significantly alter the racial distribution of admitted students, with the share of white admits falling and all other groups rising or remaining unchanged.”

Here, we see that whites are provided entry by a plethora of other preferences they would not qualify for if not for connections they have due to their race. The study shows that Asians are not adversely impacted because Harvard must admit blacks and Hispanics that are presumably unqualified. Instead, we see white ALDC students who would not qualify under any other circumstance who get accepted at more than double the percentage of Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans who meet the same criteria. Edward Blum and his fake Students for Fair Admissions “organization” have whined to the supreme court for years, bringing meritless garbage case after case. The facts plainly show that more unqualified white students are admitted into Harvard due to preferences they get that nonwhites would not. Those preferences are the real cause of whatever reduction in admissions that is claimed.

Equal protection means that government entities must treat all individuals the same when the circumstances or situations are the same. Students for Fair Admissions claimed that Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Title VI “prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in federal financial assistance programs and activities.” The numbers show that when the circumstances and situations are the same, meaning ALDC preferences, 2.68 times more whites get admitted due to this preference than Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Judging by the Equal Protection clause, those same groups are not receiving equal protection as determined by the 14th Amendment relative to ALDC preferences.

STOP LYING ABOUT WHITES AND ASIANS GETTING PASSED OVER FOR BLACKS!

Ian Millhiser, The Supreme Court case that could end affirmative action, explained, Mar 2, 2021, The Supreme Court case that could end affirmative action, explained

Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College, First Circuit Holds that Harvard’s Admissions Program Does Not Violate the Civil Rights Act., Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College

TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 42 U.S.C. § 2000D ET SEQ., Title VI Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 42 U.S.C. § 2000d Et Seq.

Russell W. Galloway Jr., Basic Equal Protection Analysis, 29 Santa Clara L. Rev. 121 (1989). Basic Equal Protection Analysis

The diverse demographics of Asian Americans, The diverse demographics of Asian Americans

Admissions Statistics, A Brief Profile of the Admitted Class of 2025, Harvard welcomes students from across the country and all over, Admissions Statistics

Daniella Silva, Study on Harvard finds 43 percent of white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff, Study finds 43 percent of Harvard's white students are legacy, athletes, related to donors or staff

Peter Arcidiacono, Josh Kinsler, Tyler Ransom, National Bureau Of Economic Research, Legacy And Athlete Preferences At Harvard, Working Paper 26316, Legacy and Athlete Preferences at Harvard
I stopped when you said you had a college education and then some (so do I), and that you are more intelligent than I.

Ofher than that, I decided not to punch down anymore and didn’t read whatever you copied and pasted.
 
Anti-black filth? Give me a break. (You’ve said awful things about Jews, bitching and complaining.)There is nothing awful about noting that the black underclass would help themselves via education and not having children out of wedlock. That’s filth?

It seems there’s an effort underway to paint anything other than full acceptance of poor lifestyle choices among blacks as “filth.” Nobody is falling for it.

And the Forward is a far-left rag, nearing socialism. I ignore their self-loathing nonsense.
More lies. I've said nothing about Jews that is even close to the filth you have posted. If you check birth numbers whites have had more children born out of wedlock than blacks have had total births in almost every year. Furthermore out of wedlock births have nothing to do wiyh this.

"The median white single parent has 2.2 times more wealth than the median black two-parent household and 1.9 times more wealth than the median Latino two-parent household."

Amy Traub, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede and Thomas Shapiro, DEMOS, The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap, pg. 10 https://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/Asset Value of Whiteness_0.pdf

And when you speak of underclass, try paying attention to the white underclass instead of posting factless drivel that denies the reality that racially biased policies still impede all people of color and not just blacks.

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 2008 through 2012, “persons in poor households at or below the federal poverty level had more than double the rate of violent victimization as persons in high-income households. This pattern of poor people having the highest rates of violence was consistent for both whites and blacks.”

For the period 2008-12:
  • Persons in poor households at or below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) (39.8 per 1,000) had more than double the rate of violent victimization as persons in high-income households (16.9 per 1,000).
  • Persons in poor households had a higher rate of violence involving a firearm (3.5 per 1,000) compared to persons above the FPL (0.8-2.5 per 1,000).
  • The overall pattern of poor persons having the highest rates of violent victimization was consistent for both whites and blacks. However, the rate of violent victimization for Hispanics did not vary across poverty levels.
  • Poor Hispanics (25.3 per 1,000) had lower rates of violence compared to poor whites (46.4 per 1,000) and poor blacks (43.4 per 1,000).
  • Poor persons living in urban areas (43.9 per 1,000) had violent victimization rates similar to poor persons living in rural areas (38.8 per 1,000).
  • Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000).34
Notice the numbers per capita when all else is the same. Across the board, poor whites had higher per capita violence rates than poor blacks.

Erika Harrell, Lynn Langton, Marcus Berzofsky, Lance Couzens, Hope Smiley-McDonald, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Poverty and Nonfatal Violent Victimization, 2008-2012, NCJ Number 248384, November 2014, Household Poverty and Nonfatal Violent Victimization, 2008-2012

The poorest lifestyle choice that affects people of color are those by whites in authority with your attitude.. Their choices end up in racially biased public policy.
 
More lies. I've said nothing about Jews that is even close to the filth you have posted. If you check birth numbers whites have had more children born out of wedlock than blacks have had total births in almost every year. Furthermore out of wedlock births have nothing to do wiyh this.

"The median white single parent has 2.2 times more wealth than the median black two-parent household and 1.9 times more wealth than the median Latino two-parent household."

Amy Traub, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede and Thomas Shapiro, DEMOS, The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap, pg. 10 https://www.demos.org/sites/default/files/publications/Asset Value of Whiteness_0.pdf

And when you speak of underclass, try paying attention to the white underclass instead of posting factless drivel that denies the reality that racially biased policies still impede all people of color and not just blacks.

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 2008 through 2012, “persons in poor households at or below the federal poverty level had more than double the rate of violent victimization as persons in high-income households. This pattern of poor people having the highest rates of violence was consistent for both whites and blacks.”

For the period 2008-12:
  • Persons in poor households at or below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) (39.8 per 1,000) had more than double the rate of violent victimization as persons in high-income households (16.9 per 1,000).
  • Persons in poor households had a higher rate of violence involving a firearm (3.5 per 1,000) compared to persons above the FPL (0.8-2.5 per 1,000).
  • The overall pattern of poor persons having the highest rates of violent victimization was consistent for both whites and blacks. However, the rate of violent victimization for Hispanics did not vary across poverty levels.
  • Poor Hispanics (25.3 per 1,000) had lower rates of violence compared to poor whites (46.4 per 1,000) and poor blacks (43.4 per 1,000).
  • Poor persons living in urban areas (43.9 per 1,000) had violent victimization rates similar to poor persons living in rural areas (38.8 per 1,000).
  • Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000).34
Notice the numbers per capita when all else is the same. Across the board, poor whites had higher per capita violence rates than poor blacks.

Erika Harrell, Lynn Langton, Marcus Berzofsky, Lance Couzens, Hope Smiley-McDonald, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Poverty and Nonfatal Violent Victimization, 2008-2012, NCJ Number 248384, November 2014, Household Poverty and Nonfatal Violent Victimization, 2008-2012

The poorest lifestyle choice that affects people of color are those by whites in authority with your attitude.. Their choices end up in racially biased public policy.
So, what’s your point? That more blacks are poor? That’s due to the high out-of-wedlock rate and poor educational attainment among the “underclass.”

Hardly qualifies as “filth.”:
 
Since whites commit the most crime, it affects the other cultures in America far more.

So it is you who has the least right to lecture.
Black males are about 5% of the population. You commit over 50% of all crime.

Nobody's gonna stop talking about it, so I guess you're just gonna have to deal with it
 
1660253827400.png

In the wake of World War II, the horrors of Nazism were becoming public and publicly repudiated. Eugenics and political forms of institutional anti-Semitism lost much of their hold. A good economy and a progressive political climate enabled America to dismantle some aspects of legal discrimination and segregation. One result was that Ashkenazi Jews became white; for a while, in the ’50s, we even became a best-selling flavor of American popular culture. Those benefits weren’t extended to African Americans, Mexican Americans, Japanese Americans and other Asian Americans. Racism itself didn’t take a hit. The category of white just expanded to include Southern and Eastern Europeans. I figured it was permanent.


These are words from a Jewish author published by a Jewish organization. This is checkmate.

How Jews Became White Folks — and May Become Nonwhite Under Trump
 
Black males are about 5% of the population. You commit over 50% of all crime.

Nobody's gonna stop talking about it, so I guess you're just gonna have to deal with it
Blacks do not commit over 50 percent of the crime.

In 2020, whites were 51 percent of the criminal offenders.
Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, Arrests by Race and Ethnicity, 2020 Table 43

In 2020, there were 7,173,072, crime offenders in the United States. That 7.1 million is 100 percent of the offenders in America. In 2020 according to the census, the U.S. population was 331,449,281. That number is 100 percent of the U.S. population. Out of 331,449,281 citizens, 7,173,072 people or 2.16 percent of the American population were criminal offenders. The 3,642,932 white offenders were 1.09 percent of the American population. The 2,122,038 black offenders were 0.6 percent of the American population.

And every time you post that lie, you will see this.
 
Last edited:
1660253827400.png

In the wake of World War II, the horrors of Nazism were becoming public and publicly repudiated. Eugenics and political forms of institutional anti-Semitism lost much of their hold. A good economy and a progressive political climate enabled America to dismantle some aspects of legal discrimination and segregation. One result was that Ashkenazi Jews became white; for a while, in the ’50s, we even became a best-selling flavor of American popular culture. Those benefits weren’t extended to African Americans, Mexican Americans, Japanese Americans and other Asian Americans. Racism itself didn’t take a hit. The category of white just expanded to include Southern and Eastern Europeans. I figured it was permanent.


These are words from a Jewish author published by a Jewish organization. This is checkmate.

How Jews Became White Folks — and May Become Nonwhite Under Trump
I already told you The Forward is a far-left rag. There is no shortage of leftist Jews who do harm to their own people. Not reading it.
 
For most of the serious crimes its over half.

Murder and robbery in particular
Incorrect. All crime is serious and whites lead in large margins in 28 out of 30 categories of crime. Fraud and embezzlement is robbery.
 

Forum List

Back
Top