Black Pastor Calls Out Those Speaking Against Charlie Kirk

Btw examples:

1. Having the phrase "catch fascist" printed on flyers being passed out at a college campus.

2. Threatening to destroy private property by threatening to urinate on Charlie Kirk's grave.

3. Threatening to hang all MAGA supporters.

4. Threatening to shoot all MAGA supporters and advocate for more assassinations and wishing death upon us.



I reported on all of the above recently and I don't see a single thing posted here that doesn't deserve a lockup.


Oh and threatening to urinate on somebody's grave is considered indecent exposure too.
 
As I stated, and you seem to be unable to understand, those who break the law by threatening destruction should be penalized and that usually means jail time. I typed real slow this time so hopefully you can comprehend.
FU. Apparently you lack intelligence. I merely pointed out the ignorance of the OP.

You might read the entire thread before jumping to conclusions.
 
How many black pastors said that after MLK was assassinated? They should be thankful that republicans aren't easily coerced into violence.
 
You may want to live in a police state, but most don’t.

Unbelievably, a lot of people don't seem to have a problem with that. But I really don't think they understand what they're wishing for.

 


Lol ironically I keep saying exactly the same thing when it comes to just stating the obvious that the majority of the left wants Republicans dead and that they're prone to violence and destruction.
 
FU. Apparently you lack intelligence. I merely pointed out the ignorance of the OP.

You might read the entire thread before jumping to conclusions.
I did, and the only lack of intelligence here is shown by yourself. If you would only go back and read your own post to me you would see that I answered it properly. Refusing to admit it shows you simply refuse to admit when you are wrong.
 
Lol ironically I keep saying exactly the same thing when it comes to just stating the obvious that the majority of the left wants Republicans dead and that they're prone to violence and destruction.
Is the right prone to violence too? Or is it only the left?
 
I did, and the only lack of intelligence here is shown by yourself. If you would only go back and read your own post to me you would see that I answered it properly. Refusing to admit it shows you simply refuse to admit when you are wrong.
Do you want people executed and imprisoned for threatening violence against others?
 
Do you want people executed and imprisoned for threatening violence against others?
Yes, I want law breakers, and threatening violence is against the law, imprisoned. I have stated that 3 times now and you just ignore it and ask again. Do you want law breakers to avoid punishment?
 
Yes, I want law breakers, and threatening violence is against the law, imprisoned. I have stated that 3 times now and you just ignore it and ask again. Do you want law breakers to avoid punishment?
So dumb.

If your neighbor threatens to burn down your house, you want the state to execute him.

THINK ASSHOLE!
 
So dumb.

If your neighbor threatens to burn down your house, you want the state to execute him.

THINK ASSHOLE!
What an idiot you are. Please show me, if you can actually read, where it says anywhere in the English language that imprisonment is the same as execution. You just proved you are dumber than a box of rocks.
 
Oh and threatening to urinate on somebody's grave is considered indecent exposure too.

You don't seem to make any distinction whatsoever between words and actions. I feel silly even having to state something so obvious, but saying "I would like to pee on so-and-so's grave" is NOT the same thing as actually going to a public place and exposing one's private parts.

Where's that I feel like I'm taking crazy pills vid again :wink: :laugh:
 
Is the right prone to violence too? Or is it only the left?

The right is mostly only prone to violence when the left starts the fight and the right is just finishing it.

Yes, I want law breakers, and threatening violence is against the law, imprisoned. I have stated that 3 times now and you just ignore it and ask again. Do you want law breakers to avoid punishment?

Just avoid wasting time with this one. He just doesn't get it. 🙄

What an idiot you are. Please show me, if you can actually read, where it says anywhere in the English language that imprisonment is the same as execution. You just proved you are dumber than a box of rocks.

Well if a crime is serious enough execution should be required with just the threat of harm or murder to somebody. For example, people like Tyler Robinson.

You don't seem to make any distinction whatsoever between words and actions. I feel silly even having to state something so obvious, but saying "I would like to pee on so-and-so's grave" is NOT the same thing as actually going to a public place and exposing one's private parts.

Where's that I feel like I'm taking crazy pills vid again :wink: :laugh:

No, but threatening to do so if actually done would be considered indecent exposure. Just the threat alone is threatening vandalism though which should require a lock-up because you're threatening to destroy somebody's private property.
 
What an idiot you are. Please show me, if you can actually read, where it says anywhere in the English language that imprisonment is the same as execution. You just proved you are dumber than a box of rocks.
Dumb **** please understand my point. The op is an advocate for executing people for making threats. I pointed this out and oppose it.

People make threats against others all the time. In this country, we don’t execute such people. If you want to live in a country where executions are commonplace for such things, you're an idiot.
 
We're doomed. That is all. 🙁

I can see why Ben Franklin said "A republic, if you can keep it."


We're only doomed if the government decides to take away our right to disagree with each other and as of September 10th of this year the left has been trying hard.
 
15th post
The right is mostly only prone to violence when the left starts the fight and the right is just finishing it.



Just avoid wasting time with this one. He just doesn't get it. 🙄



Well if a crime is serious enough execution should be required with just the threat of harm or murder to somebody. For example, people like Tyler Robinson.



No, but threatening to do so if actually done would be considered indecent exposure. Just the threat alone is threatening vandalism though which should require a lock-up because you're threatening to destroy somebody's private property.
I see from his latest post he still doesn't understand what idiocy he is spouting. I don't suffer fools well so will leave him with his juvenile babbling so he can stew in his own ignorance.
 
Back
Top Bottom