Black Pastor Calls Out Those Speaking Against Charlie Kirk

[ChristisKing]

I didn't know whether to put this in religion or politics because his full sermon is great but the one thing he said I do believe that he absolutely nailed. How can you say that the guy advocates for hate when you can't even point to any specific examples of it?

 

[gipper]

Do you oppose free speech?

Do you want those who criticize Kirk imprisoned or executed?

 

[ChristisKing]

Do you oppose free speech?

Do you want those who criticize Kirk imprisoned or executed?

People who criticize him no. People who threaten to destroy other people and or their property yes.

 

[gipper]

People who criticize him no. People who threaten to destroy other people and or their property yes.

Threaten? So they haven’t actually done anything. They’ve merely threatened to. How does that work?

 

[ChristisKing]

Threaten? So they haven’t actually done anything. They’ve merely threatened to. How does that work?

I really don't have time for this as people like you are just sick if you don't understand how that's wrong.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

In my opinion, that man points out something rather interesting. Satan's name is never taken in vain, and neither is the name of Allah or any other person that people out there believe in.

God bless you and that preacher man always!!!

Holly

 

[buttercup]

I really don't have time for this as people like you are just sick if you don't understand how that's wrong.

Of course threatening people is wrong. That isn't the point of contention. The problem that people have is that you seem to be saying that people should be executed because of their words. (If you didn't actually say that, you seemed to be implying that in your posts on other threads.) Again, if you want to live in North Korea... that's your prerogative. But please don't try to turn the US into North Korea.

 

[gipper]

I really don't have time for this as people like you are just sick if you don't understand how that's wrong.

Lol.

You stated above you want anyone who threatens to destroy others or property of others be imprisoned and/or executed.

I hope you realize now how ignorant that is.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Lol.

You stated above you want anyone who threatens to destroy others or property of others be imprisoned and/or executed.

I hope you realize now how ignorant that is.

If you don't understand that threatening to destroy others property is against the law, you are the ignorant one. Breaking the law leads to imprisonment.

 

[ChristisKing]

Of course threatening people is wrong. That isn't the point of contention. The problem that people have is that you seem to be saying that people should be executed because of their words. (If you didn't actually say that, you seemed to be implying that in your posts on other threads.) Again, if you want to live in North Korea... that's your prerogative. But please don't try to turn the US into North Korea.

If they start making threats to harm another person in a really brutal way or destroy their property then that isn't free speech anymore, that's criminal.

Lol.

You stated above you want anyone who threatens to destroy others or property of others be imprisoned and/or executed.

I hope you realize now how ignorant that is.

Give me a break!

 

[ChristisKing]

Btw examples:

1. Having the phrase "catch fascist" printed on flyers being passed out at a college campus.

2. Threatening to destroy private property by threatening to urinate on Charlie Kirk's grave.

3. Threatening to hang all MAGA supporters.

4. Threatening to shoot all MAGA supporters and advocate for more assassinations and wishing death upon us.



I reported on all of the above recently and I don't see a single thing posted here that doesn't deserve a lockup.

 

[gipper]

If they start making threats to harm another person in a really brutal way or destroy their property then that isn't free speech anymore, that's criminal.


Give me a break!

So you now realize wanting the state to execute or imprison someone for making threats is dumb. Glad you realize this.

 

[ChristisKing]

So you now realize wanting the state to execute or imprison someone for making threats is dumb. Glad you realize this.

Read post #11.

 

[gipper]

If you don't understand that threatening to destroy others property is against the law, you are the ignorant one. Breaking the law leads to imprisonment.

The OP clearly stated he wants those who threaten to be executed or imprisoned. Do you agree?

 

[gipper]

If they start making threats to harm another person in a really brutal way or destroy their property then that isn't free speech anymore, that's criminal.


Give me a break!

You disagree with your stated position. Lol.

 

[buttercup]

Btw examples:

1. Having the phrase "catch fascist" printed on flyers being passed out at a college campus.

2. Threatening to destroy private property by threatening to urinate on Charlie Kirk's grave.

3. Threatening to hang all MAGA supporters.

4. Threatening to shoot all MAGA supporters and advocate for more assassinations and wishing death upon us.



I reported on all of the above recently and I don't see a single thing posted here that doesn't deserve a lockup.

People say stupid things online all the time. If you really want to lock people up for saying they want to pee on his grave... then I'm sorry but that is absurd. But worse than that...like I mentioned on other threads, you are only shooting yourself in the foot because any power you give the government to go after people you don't like is going to come back around to you, like a boomerang, when the wrong people get in power. If you don't think they're going to go after conservatives for so called "hate speech" or Wrongthink, you are woefully mistaken.

 

[ChristisKing]

People say stupid things online all the time. If you really want to lock people up for saying they want to pee on his grave... then I'm sorry but that is absurd. But worse than that...like I mentioned on other threads, you are only shooting yourself in the foot because any power you give the government to go after people you don't like is going to come back around to you, like a boomerang, when the wrong people get in power. If you don't think they're going to go after conservatives for so called "hate speech" or Wrongthink, you are woefully mistaken.

This just isn't online most of that was in the news and the FBI was already alerted by the catch fascist thing and why shouldn't a threat of urinating on somebody's grave be a lock up? It's threatening to commit vandalism.

 

[gipper]

This just isn't online most of that was in the news and the FBI was already alerted by the catch fascist thing and why shouldn't a threat of urinating on somebody's grave be a lock up? It's threatening to commit vandalism.

The point is you believe people who make threats should be EXECUTED or IMPRISONED.

You may want to live in a police state, but most don’t.

 

[ChristisKing]

I give up!!

 

[Silent Warrior]

The OP clearly stated he wants those who threaten to be executed or imprisoned. Do you agree?

As I stated, and you seem to be unable to understand, those who break the law by threatening destruction should be penalized and that usually means jail time. I typed real slow this time so hopefully you can comprehend.