ASmith --Armed and resisting arrest
KScott - Armed and resisting arrest
ASterling - Armed and resisting arrest
again--you, as a cop, would go around the hood unarmed?? yes or no?
a criminal has a gun and resisting --you would talk nicely
I would recognized that i'm a trained professional...
None of those cases ever should have escalated to lethal force.
let me say it again--you are full of SHIT
you, being a cop, --are going to let a CRIMINAL--who just violently attacked you--run away??
Um, yeah. Certainly makes more sense than firing down a street where if you missed him, you might hit other civilians.
Oh, please note, no police department has rehired Darren Wilson. I wonder why that is.
your first sentence invalidates all your posts in this thread because evidence shows he wasn't running away
where is your evidence?
the evidence shows he was ATTACKING the cop
The evidence shows he was 149 feet away from the parked police cruiser that the initial altercation took place at.
1. MBrown had a felony conviction--this shows he was not an angel, but capable of bad things
Really? What Felony conviction?
2. thieves that are thinking logically/etc hide their face and want to get in/out fast--MB takes his time stealing, does not hide his face...doesn't care who sees him
...this shows:
...a.criminal, illogical, crazy, abnormal thinking
...b. he will do whatever he wants--F&^K authority
Or that he had an agreement with the store employees for the merchandise he bartered for... but the cops didn't release the tape of him trading pot for the product with store employees.
you shot yourself in the foot--there is no evidence he was going away from the cop==and all evidence supports him ATTACKING the cop
Except again- 149 feet away from the Police Cruiser. so he attacks the cop, runs away, and then decides to attack the cop again? That doesn't make any sense.
Not to mention, a lot of witnesses said he had his hands up!