Black hate group defeated in New Orleans

Just the fact that David Duke is still around, relevant to his bugwit supporters, and supports Trump and his supporters support Duke speaks volumes of a galactic proportion.
 
New Orleans: Black Hate Group Defeated - The New Observer

Great news! This is also great media attention for Dukes Campaign!

Andrew Jackson was one of the greatest American Presidents and who cares what a feral group of sub-knuckledragging, barely educated thugs think.

Law and order and discipline need to be restored, the whip needs cracking.

It's getting nearer the time when law enforcement in the American nation need to get hardcore on the BLM thugs, start shooting most of them and rounding up their hangers-on and dragging them off and putting them in dungeons.

BLM are an American Domestic Terrorist Group and need to be treated as such and those that support them need to be treated the same, as Domestic Terrorists and Subversives.

As Andrew Jackson once stated:

andrew%20jackson%20quote.jpg
 
Just the fact that David Duke is still around, relevant to his bugwit supporters, and supports Trump and his supporters support Duke speaks volumes of a galactic proportion.
Way to avoid any criticism of the black racists....

The American President has an oath he swears to and part of it is to protect the American nation from all threats foreign and domestic.

BLM are a Domestic Terrorist Group, they should be declared as such and treated as such.

BLM are a threat to the domestic stability of the American nation, they have issued an Open Season threat to ALL white police, simply because they're white, so yes of course BLM are racist and also they're a Black Supremacist group, so why aren't they listed as such with the SPLC?

Oh that's right, we know why, the SPLC are a Neo-Marxist organisation who also hate white people because only white people are racist :rolleyes-41:

Black Supremacist groups stating "hate whites", "kill whitey", "ALL white people are devils", "kill white people" none of that is racist because blacks can't be racist :rolleyes-41:
 
Just the fact that David Duke is still around, relevant to his bugwit supporters, and supports Trump and his supporters support Duke speaks volumes of a galactic proportion.
Duke does not support Trump, dude.

David Duke: Donald Trump Is Too Zionist for Me
David Duke: Donald Trump Is Too Zionist for Me
The white supremacist insists he has not endorsed the billionaire ‘either informally or formally’—because while Duke likes Trump’s immigration plans, his support of Israel is a problem.

David Duke Says He Will Vote For Trump, But Denies Endorsement

bak04


Donald Trump: "I don't need" David Duke's endorsement

The billionaire businessman, who's currently leading the polls for the GOP nomination, was praised recently by David Duke, an infamous white supremacist who called the GOP frontrunner the "best of the lot" among presidential candidates.

"Although we can't trust him to do what he says, the other Republican candidates won't even say what he says," Duke said last week on his radio show, according to Buzzfeed, praising Trump's outspoken opposition to illegal immigration. "So he's certainly the best of the lot. And he's certainly somebody that we should get behind in terms, ya know, raising the image of this thing."

Trump was asked Wednesday about Duke's praise, and he distanced himself from the white supremacist.

"I don't need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn't want his endorsement," Trump said during an interview with Bloomberg News on Wednesday. "I don't need anyone's endorsement."

When he was asked whether he would flat-out reject Duke's support, Trump replied, "Sure, I would if that would make you feel better."

He wasn't surprised by Duke's kind words, however.

"A lot of people like me," Trump explained. "Republicans like me, liberals like me. Everybody likes me."

Despite his praise for Trump, Duke has also voiced some reservations, saying the GOP frontrunner might be a bit too friendly with the "Jewish elite" for his taste.

 
Black Supremacist groups stating "hate whites", "kill whitey", "ALL white peopleneral, Eric are devils", "kill white people" none of that is racist because black
The day a racist black man named Obama took office and chose a racist Attorney general named Eric Holder who has the power of Federal Government to influence our lives, the "can't be racist" excuse is moot.
 
Just the fact that David Duke is still around, relevant to his bugwit supporters, and supports Trump and his supporters support Duke speaks volumes of a galactic proportion.
Way to avoid any criticism of the black racists....

The American President has an oath he swears to and part of it is to protect the American nation from all threats foreign and domestic.

BLM are a Domestic Terrorist Group, they should be declared as such and treated as such.

BLM are a threat to the domestic stability of the American nation, they have issued an Open Season threat to ALL white police, simply because they're white, so yes of course BLM are racist and also they're a Black Supremacist group, so why aren't they listed as such with the SPLC?

Oh that's right, we know why, the SPLC are a Neo-Marxist organisation who also hate white people because only white people are racist :rolleyes-41:

Black Supremacist groups stating "hate whites", "kill whitey", "ALL white people are devils", "kill white people" none of that is racist because blacks can't be racist :rolleyes-41:

obama's interpretation of who is a threat is different than the average American's. clinton is no different. She intends to import 5 to 6 times more terrorists here from the middle east than obama has. Of course, most of the obama and clintonbots on this forum are cool with this. They've bought into the insane theory that our strength is in our diversity. The more diverse (different than us) they are, the stronger we become. Osama bin laden and Muhammed must be somewhere in their version of heaven laughing at these fools.

Politifact: Hillary Clinton for 500% Increase in Syrian Refugees
 
Just the fact that David Duke is still around, relevant to his bugwit supporters, and supports Trump and his supporters support Duke speaks volumes of a galactic proportion.
Duke does not support Trump, dude.

David Duke: Donald Trump Is Too Zionist for Me
David Duke: Donald Trump Is Too Zionist for Me
The white supremacist insists he has not endorsed the billionaire ‘either informally or formally’—because while Duke likes Trump’s immigration plans, his support of Israel is a problem.

David Duke Says He Will Vote For Trump, But Denies Endorsement

bak04

Donald Trump: "I don't need" David Duke's endorsement

The billionaire businessman, who's currently leading the polls for the GOP nomination, was praised recently by David Duke, an infamous white supremacist who called the GOP frontrunner the "best of the lot" among presidential candidates.

"Although we can't trust him to do what he says, the other Republican candidates won't even say what he says," Duke said last week on his radio show, according to Buzzfeed, praising Trump's outspoken opposition to illegal immigration. "So he's certainly the best of the lot. And he's certainly somebody that we should get behind in terms, ya know, raising the image of this thing."

Trump was asked Wednesday about Duke's praise, and he distanced himself from the white supremacist.

"I don't need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn't want his endorsement," Trump said during an interview with Bloomberg News on Wednesday. "I don't need anyone's endorsement."

When he was asked whether he would flat-out reject Duke's support, Trump replied, "Sure, I would if that would make you feel better."

He wasn't surprised by Duke's kind words, however.

"A lot of people like me," Trump explained. "Republicans like me, liberals like me. Everybody likes me."

Despite his praise for Trump, Duke has also voiced some reservations, saying the GOP frontrunner might be a bit too friendly with the "Jewish elite" for his taste.
You must understand why people are confused, since David Duke keeps saying things like not voting for Trump is "treason against your heritage"
 
It's so telling isn't it, racists blaming the first black president for their racism. You derps aren't fooling anyone, your racist slip is showing.
 
It's so telling isn't it, racists blaming the first black president for their racism. You derps aren't fooling anyone, your racist slip is showing.

A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially similar yet weaker proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position
 
Just the fact that David Duke is still around, relevant to his bugwit supporters, and supports Trump and his supporters support Duke speaks volumes of a galactic proportion.
Duke does not support Trump, dude.

David Duke: Donald Trump Is Too Zionist for Me
David Duke: Donald Trump Is Too Zionist for Me
The white supremacist insists he has not endorsed the billionaire ‘either informally or formally’—because while Duke likes Trump’s immigration plans, his support of Israel is a problem.

David Duke Says He Will Vote For Trump, But Denies Endorsement

bak04

Donald Trump: "I don't need" David Duke's endorsement

The billionaire businessman, who's currently leading the polls for the GOP nomination, was praised recently by David Duke, an infamous white supremacist who called the GOP frontrunner the "best of the lot" among presidential candidates.

"Although we can't trust him to do what he says, the other Republican candidates won't even say what he says," Duke said last week on his radio show, according to Buzzfeed, praising Trump's outspoken opposition to illegal immigration. "So he's certainly the best of the lot. And he's certainly somebody that we should get behind in terms, ya know, raising the image of this thing."

Trump was asked Wednesday about Duke's praise, and he distanced himself from the white supremacist.

"I don't need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn't want his endorsement," Trump said during an interview with Bloomberg News on Wednesday. "I don't need anyone's endorsement."

When he was asked whether he would flat-out reject Duke's support, Trump replied, "Sure, I would if that would make you feel better."

He wasn't surprised by Duke's kind words, however.

"A lot of people like me," Trump explained. "Republicans like me, liberals like me. Everybody likes me."

Despite his praise for Trump, Duke has also voiced some reservations, saying the GOP frontrunner might be a bit too friendly with the "Jewish elite" for his taste.
You must understand why people are confused, since David Duke keeps saying things like not voting for Trump is "treason against your heritage"

He's almost right. Not voting for Trump is a vote to further America's decline.
 
It's so telling isn't it, racists blaming the first black president for their racism. You derps aren't fooling anyone, your racist slip is showing.

A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially similar yet weaker proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position

You can cut and paste but you don't comprehend. It defeats the purpose.
 
Does anyone have a link showing that BLM advocates violence or have issued an open season threat on police?

I don't mean statements or rantings from individuals attaching their personal agendas to BLM, but actual statements from the organisation.
 
Does anyone have a link showing that BLM advocates violence or have issued an open season threat on police?

I don't mean statements or rantings from individuals attaching their personal agendas to BLM, but actual statements from the organisation.
The organization cannot speak itself. It is an organization. It speaks through its members. When BLM marches chanting what do we want. Dead cops. When do we want them, now. It is the organization that is speaking.
 
Does anyone have a link showing that BLM advocates violence or have issued an open season threat on police?

I don't mean statements or rantings from individuals attaching their personal agendas to BLM, but actual statements from the organisation.
The organization cannot speak itself. It is an organization. It speaks through its members. When BLM marches chanting what do we want. Dead cops. When do we want them, now. It is the organization that is speaking.
Really?
An organisation is usually formed around an agenda.
 

Forum List

Back
Top