task0778
Diamond Member
When the Supreme Court issued their ruling on Dobbs, they basically overturned Roe v Wade and threw the issue back to the states to determine what their abortion laws should be via the legislative process, which is answerable to the electorate. If the voters in a state are not satisfied with their state laws on the subject, they can vote in other people who can change it, and that is as it should be. We do not need 9 unelected people deciding such contentious issues, especially since there is nothing in the Constitution or federal law for them to base such a decision to ban all abortions.
The bishop can request whatever he wants, but he ain't going to get this, not with this Court.
The bishop can request whatever he wants, but he ain't going to get this, not with this Court.