"Bipartisanship" is a communist tactic and should be rejected.

[Theowl32]

Do not fall for this tactic. It is a word designed again to break down the republic. Also, don't fall into the false notion that this country is or was ever supposed to be a democracy.

We are supposed to be a country built on opposing views, and debate. Arguing at the top of your lungs your point of view and being able express yourself accordingly.

Bipartisanship is just another ploy to seduce the gullible in making it an entirely compromised system. Shutting your expressions and opinions and silencing voices.

Watch out and look who keeps expressing this notion. Think about it. You think the democrats run by China are all concerned about the stability of this republic and our freedoms?

So, when it is them that pushes "Bipartisanship" what do you suppose the insidious goal is?

Wake up people. I am seeing more and more conservatives falling for this tactic of theirs over the years.

 

[Mac1958]

Bipartisanship:

 

[Votto]

Do not fall for this tactic. It is a word designed again to break down the republic. Also, don't fall into the false notion that this country is or was ever supposed to be a democracy.

We are supposed to be a country built on opposing views, and debate. Arguing at the top of your lungs your point of view and being able express yourself accordingly.

Bipartisanship is just another ploy to seduce the gullible in making it an entirely compromised system. Shutting your expressions and opinions and silencing voices.

Watch out and look who keeps expressing this notion. Think about it. You think the democrats run by China are all concerned about the stability of this republic and our freedoms?

So, when it is them that pushes "Bipartisanship" what do you suppose the insidious goal is?

Wake up people. I am seeing more and more conservatives falling for this tactic of theirs over the years.

The only time I get really concerned is when both parties agree to anything.

Time to grab the lube when they do.

 

[JLW]

What an inane thread.

You get communism, authoritarianism and any other form despotism from lack of bipartisanship and compromise.

 

[JLW]

Bipartisanship:

You better stop posting portraits of those renegades and "commies", the Trumpers will get all kind of triggered.

 

[Jets]

There would be no Constitution if not for “bipartisanship”.

 

[Theowl32]

What an inane thread.

You get communism, authoritarianism and any other form despotism from lack of bipartisanship, dumbass.

That is the exact opposite idiot. You think there is an opposition party in North Korea? You think Castro tolerated any opposition party? Want to show you his prisons he sent his political rivals to? Do you, you ignorant idiot?'

Marxism shuts down opposing expression you ignorant buffoon.

Look at the board communists folks. Make no mistake, bipartisanship is another term for NEW WORLD ORDER.

NO OPPOSING VIEWS. EVERYONE IN AGREEMENT and if YOU ARE NOT IN AGRREEMENT, then you ARE CANCELED.

Who do we suppose is pushing the CANCEL CULTURE folks?

Get your heads out of your collective asses!!! The left are dragging us into a hell that will not end. Bipartisanship is an ABSOLUTE BS TERM.

 

[Votto]

There would be no Constitution if not for “bipartisanship”.

Ok which two parties signed the Constitution?

 

[JLW]

What an inane thread.

You get communism, authoritarianism and any other form despotism from lack of bipartisanship, dumbass.

That is the exact opposite idiot. You think there is an opposition party in North Korea? You think Castro tolerated any opposition party? Want to show you his prisons he sent his political rivals to? Do you, you ignorant idiot?'

Marxism shuts down opposing expression you ignorant buffoon.

Look at the board communists folks. Make no mistake, bipartisanship is another term for NEW WORLD ORDER.

NO OPPOSING VIEWS. EVERYONE IN AGREEMENT and if YOU ARE NOT IN AGRREEMENT, then you ARE CANCELED.

Who do we suppose is pushing the CANCEL CULTURE folks?

Get your heads out of your collective asses!!! The left are dragging us into a hell that will not end. Bipartisanship is an ABSOLUTE BS TERM.

This country was built on compromise and when that failed 600,000 Americans died. Never again shall we go down that road.

"Cancel Culture" is not bipartisan.

You obviously have little understanding of what it means to be bipartisan or to compromise. It is a give and take for the good of the country.

 

[Lesh]

The Constitution was signed by representatives of 13 competing states. Each of which had multiple competing “factions” in them.

It was the perfect example of compromise.

The OP is a partisan idiot

 

[Jets]

There would be no Constitution if not for “bipartisanship”.

Ok which two parties signed the Constitution?

Never stated it involved parties. That being said, both federalists and anti federalists had to compromise for the creation of the constitution.

Isn’t that bipartisanship at work?

 

[Votto]

What an inane thread.

You get communism, authoritarianism and any other form despotism from lack of bipartisanship, dumbass.

That is the exact opposite idiot. You think there is an opposition party in North Korea? You think Castro tolerated any opposition party? Want to show you his prisons he sent his political rivals to? Do you, you ignorant idiot?'

Marxism shuts down opposing expression you ignorant buffoon.

Look at the board communists folks. Make no mistake, bipartisanship is another term for NEW WORLD ORDER.

NO OPPOSING VIEWS. EVERYONE IN AGREEMENT and if YOU ARE NOT IN AGRREEMENT, then you ARE CANCELED.

Who do we suppose is pushing the CANCEL CULTURE folks?

Get your heads out of your collective asses!!! The left are dragging us into a hell that will not end. Bipartisanship is an ABSOLUTE BS TERM.

You obviously know nothing of the country in which you live or its history.

This country was built on compromise and when that failed 600,000 Americans died. Never again shall we go down that road.

"Cancel Culture" is not bipartisan.

You also know nothing of what it means top be bipartisan or to compromise. It is a give and take for the good of the country.

So the abolitionists decided to appease the slave owners and join arms to embrace the Constitution. You are happy with that are ya?

Today, the DNC says the filibuster is Jim Crow and evil and all those who embrace it are evil and must be destroyed.

Meanwhile, when Trump was in power the democrats used the filibuster 314 times.

 

[Votto]

There would be no Constitution if not for “bipartisanship”.

Ok which two parties signed the Constitution?

Never stated it involved parties. That being said, both federalists and anti federalists had to compromise for the creation of the constitution.

Isn’t that bipartisanship at work?

Not all the anti-Federalists agreed to the Constitution, like George Mason who said he would not sign the Constitution because allowing slavery would cause a wound so profound in the nation as to tear it apart latter

Was George correct in not signing the Constitution or were those who agreed to allow slavery for hundreds of years in the US correct, only to see the country disintegrate today?

 

[Theowl32]

The leftists actually trying to convince us marxist leaders tolerate opposition.

They are such losers.

 

[Jets]

There would be no Constitution if not for “bipartisanship”.

Ok which two parties signed the Constitution?

Never stated it involved parties. That being said, both federalists and anti federalists had to compromise for the creation of the constitution.

Isn’t that bipartisanship at work?

Not all the anti-Federalists agreed to the Constitution, like George Mason who said he would not sign the Constitution because allowing slavery would cause a wound so profound in the nation as to tear it apart latter

Was George correct in not signing the Constitution or were those who agreed to allow slavery for hundreds of years in the US correct, only to see the country disintegrate today?

I understand that, but was not debating the merits of why it was signed. I was simply pointing out that it was a form of bipartisanship that led to the document being created.

 

[JLW]

What an inane thread.

You get communism, authoritarianism and any other form despotism from lack of bipartisanship, dumbass.

That is the exact opposite idiot. You think there is an opposition party in North Korea? You think Castro tolerated any opposition party? Want to show you his prisons he sent his political rivals to? Do you, you ignorant idiot?'

Marxism shuts down opposing expression you ignorant buffoon.

Look at the board communists folks. Make no mistake, bipartisanship is another term for NEW WORLD ORDER.

NO OPPOSING VIEWS. EVERYONE IN AGREEMENT and if YOU ARE NOT IN AGRREEMENT, then you ARE CANCELED.

Who do we suppose is pushing the CANCEL CULTURE folks?

Get your heads out of your collective asses!!! The left are dragging us into a hell that will not end. Bipartisanship is an ABSOLUTE BS TERM.

You obviously know nothing of the country in which you live or its history.

This country was built on compromise and when that failed 600,000 Americans died. Never again shall we go down that road.

"Cancel Culture" is not bipartisan.

You also know nothing of what it means top be bipartisan or to compromise. It is a give and take for the good of the country.

So the abolitionists decided to appease the slave owners and join arms to embrace the Constitution. You are happy with that are ya?

Today, the DNC says the filibuster is Jim Crow and evil and all those who embrace it are evil and must be destroyed.

Meanwhile, when Trump was in power the democrats used the filibuster 314 times.

The filibuster has run amok. We need to get back to the era when the parties worked together. I don't why certain people find that unacceptable. Better to get some of what you want than none at all.

 

[Votto]

The leftists actually trying to convince us marxist leaders tolerate opposition.

They are such losers.

Not at all. Leftism is the most successful religion in the modern world, as it is embraced all over the globe now.

In fact, there is no where to run to escape them, so I would not call them "losers" per say

What I would call them is evil, pathetic, hypocritical, and wicked.

But at the end of the day, at the great throne of judgement, yea, I reckon they are all losers in the end.

 

[Votto]

There would be no Constitution if not for “bipartisanship”.

Ok which two parties signed the Constitution?

Never stated it involved parties. That being said, both federalists and anti federalists had to compromise for the creation of the constitution.

Isn’t that bipartisanship at work?

Not all the anti-Federalists agreed to the Constitution, like George Mason who said he would not sign the Constitution because allowing slavery would cause a wound so profound in the nation as to tear it apart latter

Was George correct in not signing the Constitution or were those who agreed to allow slavery for hundreds of years in the US correct, only to see the country disintegrate today?

I understand that, but was not debating the merits of why it was signed. I was simply pointing out that it was a form of bipartisanship that led to the document being created.

So you disagree with George Mason or agree with him?

Which is it? Was the "bipartisanship" as good at it is being touted in this thread?

We need an answer.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Bipartisanship:

GOOD POINT!
Look at all those likeminded, like-kind individuals.
They share skin color, culture, religion etc etc...a perfect scenario for bipartisanship.
Bipartisanship can NEVER work within a multicultural shithole.

 

[Jets]

There would be no Constitution if not for “bipartisanship”.

Ok which two parties signed the Constitution?

Never stated it involved parties. That being said, both federalists and anti federalists had to compromise for the creation of the constitution.

Isn’t that bipartisanship at work?

Not all the anti-Federalists agreed to the Constitution, like George Mason who said he would not sign the Constitution because allowing slavery would cause a wound so profound in the nation as to tear it apart latter

Was George correct in not signing the Constitution or were those who agreed to allow slavery for hundreds of years in the US correct, only to see the country disintegrate today?

I understand that, but was not debating the merits of why it was signed. I was simply pointing out that it was a form of bipartisanship that led to the document being created.

So you disagree with George Mason or agree with him?

Which is it? Was the "bipartisanship" as good at it is being touted in this thread?

We need an answer.

Mason was entitled to his opinion. I did not agree with him. Compromise for the Constitution was necessary and it involved the abhorrent issue of slavery.

Bipartisanship is a positive force thou it isn’t without its problems.