Billionaires made more $ in 2017 than any other year in history.

[harmonica]

these people spend more than what they can afford = stupid

Has nothing to do with the argument. Try again.

we --and the rich---are ALREADY helping the poor--contrary to the OP

There wouldn't be a poor if there were decent wages. The tax cuts over fifty years has added the wealth of the rich to almost 300%, while keeping the middle flat. If you can't see the difference there, you are total fool. I proved it from the chart. Any of you bright Republican Sheep have a better chart proving otherwise? Hell no! Because one doesn't exist.

??????!!!!!!!!what???
say that again?
people making MILLIONS go into bankruptcy
you cannot understand and/or have not followed the thread
some of the poor spend MORE than what they take in
wages have nothing to do with it
....some have MORE kids than they can afford --they could be making a GOOD wage, but they do dumb things that negate that good wage
....wow---your thinking is very shallow/narrow/etc

People spending more than they take in has zero to do with a policy for tax cuts going to the wealthy. You are debating two different topics. Are you able to carry on a semi -intelligent discussion here? Because right now, you aren't making much sense.

People spending more than they take in, has nothing to do with a fifty year old policy.

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

 

[BWK]

Has nothing to do with the argument. Try again.

we --and the rich---are ALREADY helping the poor--contrary to the OP

There wouldn't be a poor if there were decent wages. The tax cuts over fifty years has added the wealth of the rich to almost 300%, while keeping the middle flat. If you can't see the difference there, you are total fool. I proved it from the chart. Any of you bright Republican Sheep have a better chart proving otherwise? Hell no! Because one doesn't exist.

??????!!!!!!!!what???
say that again?
people making MILLIONS go into bankruptcy
you cannot understand and/or have not followed the thread
some of the poor spend MORE than what they take in
wages have nothing to do with it
....some have MORE kids than they can afford --they could be making a GOOD wage, but they do dumb things that negate that good wage
....wow---your thinking is very shallow/narrow/etc

People spending more than they take in has zero to do with a policy for tax cuts going to the wealthy. You are debating two different topics. Are you able to carry on a semi -intelligent discussion here? Because right now, you aren't making much sense.

People spending more than they take in, has nothing to do with a fifty year old policy.

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

You boys and girls better show up to this rodeo with an intelligent/ informative counter argument, or you're going to leave here doing nothing more than blowing smoke up your skirts.

You aren't saying anything of value. Get busy.

 

[Mr Natural]

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

And so they should.

 

[harmonica]

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

And so they should.

exactly--what's all the whining about

 

[BWK]

Has nothing to do with the argument. Try again.

we --and the rich---are ALREADY helping the poor--contrary to the OP

There wouldn't be a poor if there were decent wages. The tax cuts over fifty years has added the wealth of the rich to almost 300%, while keeping the middle flat. If you can't see the difference there, you are total fool. I proved it from the chart. Any of you bright Republican Sheep have a better chart proving otherwise? Hell no! Because one doesn't exist.

??????!!!!!!!!what???
say that again?
people making MILLIONS go into bankruptcy
you cannot understand and/or have not followed the thread
some of the poor spend MORE than what they take in
wages have nothing to do with it
....some have MORE kids than they can afford --they could be making a GOOD wage, but they do dumb things that negate that good wage
....wow---your thinking is very shallow/narrow/etc

People spending more than they take in has zero to do with a policy for tax cuts going to the wealthy. You are debating two different topics. Are you able to carry on a semi -intelligent discussion here? Because right now, you aren't making much sense.

People spending more than they take in, has nothing to do with a fifty year old policy.

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

Says who, you?

 

[harmonica]

we --and the rich---are ALREADY helping the poor--contrary to the OP

There wouldn't be a poor if there were decent wages. The tax cuts over fifty years has added the wealth of the rich to almost 300%, while keeping the middle flat. If you can't see the difference there, you are total fool. I proved it from the chart. Any of you bright Republican Sheep have a better chart proving otherwise? Hell no! Because one doesn't exist.

??????!!!!!!!!what???
say that again?
people making MILLIONS go into bankruptcy
you cannot understand and/or have not followed the thread
some of the poor spend MORE than what they take in
wages have nothing to do with it
....some have MORE kids than they can afford --they could be making a GOOD wage, but they do dumb things that negate that good wage
....wow---your thinking is very shallow/narrow/etc

People spending more than they take in has zero to do with a policy for tax cuts going to the wealthy. You are debating two different topics. Are you able to carry on a semi -intelligent discussion here? Because right now, you aren't making much sense.

People spending more than they take in, has nothing to do with a fifty year old policy.

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

You boys and girls better show up to this rodeo with an intelligent/ informative counter argument, or you're going to leave here doing nothing more than blowing smoke up your skirts.

You aren't saying anything of value. Get busy.

talking about posting crap

 

[Mr Natural]

exactly--what's all the whining about

That’s their job. To pay taxes and shut the fuck up.

 

[BWK]

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

And so they should.

exactly--what's all the whining about

Ignorance of not understanding raw numbers, and the wealthy couldn't be more tickled.

 

[harmonica]

exactly--what's all the whining about

That’s their job. To pay taxes and shut the fuck up.

so you don't want fairness???
very nazi

 

[Meister]

exactly--what's all the whining about

That’s their job. To pay taxes and shut the fuck up.

We all should have skin in the game, IMO. The upper 1% pay the lions share by far.

 

[BWK]

There wouldn't be a poor if there were decent wages. The tax cuts over fifty years has added the wealth of the rich to almost 300%, while keeping the middle flat. If you can't see the difference there, you are total fool. I proved it from the chart. Any of you bright Republican Sheep have a better chart proving otherwise? Hell no! Because one doesn't exist.

??????!!!!!!!!what???
say that again?
people making MILLIONS go into bankruptcy
you cannot understand and/or have not followed the thread
some of the poor spend MORE than what they take in
wages have nothing to do with it
....some have MORE kids than they can afford --they could be making a GOOD wage, but they do dumb things that negate that good wage
....wow---your thinking is very shallow/narrow/etc

People spending more than they take in has zero to do with a policy for tax cuts going to the wealthy. You are debating two different topics. Are you able to carry on a semi -intelligent discussion here? Because right now, you aren't making much sense.

People spending more than they take in, has nothing to do with a fifty year old policy.

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

You boys and girls better show up to this rodeo with an intelligent/ informative counter argument, or you're going to leave here doing nothing more than blowing smoke up your skirts.

You aren't saying anything of value. Get busy.

talking about posting crap

So, you've conceded the chart and the argument presented by the Center for Tax policy with nothing of your own. Good! Now we are getting somewhere. Thanks!

 

[harmonica]

??????!!!!!!!!what???
say that again?
people making MILLIONS go into bankruptcy
you cannot understand and/or have not followed the thread
some of the poor spend MORE than what they take in
wages have nothing to do with it
....some have MORE kids than they can afford --they could be making a GOOD wage, but they do dumb things that negate that good wage
....wow---your thinking is very shallow/narrow/etc

People spending more than they take in has zero to do with a policy for tax cuts going to the wealthy. You are debating two different topics. Are you able to carry on a semi -intelligent discussion here? Because right now, you aren't making much sense.

People spending more than they take in, has nothing to do with a fifty year old policy.

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

You boys and girls better show up to this rodeo with an intelligent/ informative counter argument, or you're going to leave here doing nothing more than blowing smoke up your skirts.

You aren't saying anything of value. Get busy.

talking about posting crap

So, you've conceded the chart and the argument presented by the Center for Tax policy with nothing of your own. Good! Now we are getting somewhere. Thanks!

I concede you HATE America AND fairness

 

[harmonica]

??????!!!!!!!!what???
say that again?
people making MILLIONS go into bankruptcy
you cannot understand and/or have not followed the thread
some of the poor spend MORE than what they take in
wages have nothing to do with it
....some have MORE kids than they can afford --they could be making a GOOD wage, but they do dumb things that negate that good wage
....wow---your thinking is very shallow/narrow/etc

People spending more than they take in has zero to do with a policy for tax cuts going to the wealthy. You are debating two different topics. Are you able to carry on a semi -intelligent discussion here? Because right now, you aren't making much sense.

People spending more than they take in, has nothing to do with a fifty year old policy.

the wealthy are paying MORE than their share

!!!!!!!!!!

You boys and girls better show up to this rodeo with an intelligent/ informative counter argument, or you're going to leave here doing nothing more than blowing smoke up your skirts.

You aren't saying anything of value. Get busy.

talking about posting crap

So, you've conceded the chart and the argument presented by the Center for Tax policy with nothing of your own. Good! Now we are getting somewhere. Thanks!

so you are saying they do not pay more than their fair share?

 

[Aba Incieni]

Some people are envious by nature. I admire success.

 

[BWK]

exactly--what's all the whining about

That’s their job. To pay taxes and shut the fuck up.

We all should have skin in the game, IMO. The upper 1% pay the lions share by far.

Negative! You folks are always wrong. Have you ever wondered why? ttps://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/15/do-the-wealthy-pay-lower-taxes-than-the-middle-class.html

 

[harmonica]

some people are not industrious/don't care/just get enough to get by/LAZY/etc

 

[harmonica]

exactly--what's all the whining about

That’s their job. To pay taxes and shut the fuck up.

We all should have skin in the game, IMO. The upper 1% pay the lions share by far.

Negative! You folks are always wrong. Have you ever wondered why? ttps://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/15/do-the-wealthy-pay-lower-taxes-than-the-middle-class.html

because you are a genius

 

[BWK]

Some people are envious by nature. I admire success.

We'll, if you admire the other guys success, it's only because you've been successful at being an idiot in math. It's a total failure of recognizing how badly you have gotten screwed, and an insult to your own education.

 

[Meister]

exactly--what's all the whining about

That’s their job. To pay taxes and shut the fuck up.

We all should have skin in the game, IMO. The upper 1% pay the lions share by far.

Negative! You folks are always wrong. Have you ever wondered why? ttps://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/15/do-the-wealthy-pay-lower-taxes-than-the-middle-class.html

Oh, you're not talking about the federal level, but talking about at the state level and local level. Got it.

 

[harmonica]

exactly--what's all the whining about

That’s their job. To pay taxes and shut the fuck up.

We all should have skin in the game, IMO. The upper 1% pay the lions share by far.

Negative! You folks are always wrong. Have you ever wondered why? ttps://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/15/do-the-wealthy-pay-lower-taxes-than-the-middle-class.html

Oh, you're not talking about the federal level, but talking about at the state level and local level. Got it.

that's in my link--but I guess he didn't like it