Billion-dollar Mexican cartel ops disrupted by Trump's border crackdown as US issues do-not-travel warning.

[Mac-7]

.

I would be happy to LEGALLY accept every good, Catholic Mexican family into my country. There are a couple families that attend Mass in my church -- very devout. I wish my Spanish was better so that I could welcome them, on behalf of my parish. Our priest treats them with the same respect he has for all other members of our parish.


.

We cant adopt everyone and accept the world

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

We cant adopt everyone and accept the world

.

I'm a little conflicted, knowing that Mexico must have a larger than normal population of murdering druglords.

But my European ancestors wanted to be Americans 150 or so years ago, and they were allowed to do so.

 

[Mac-7]

.

I'm a little conflicted, knowing that Mexico must have a larger than normal population of murdering druglords.

But my European ancestors wanted to be Americans 150 or so years ago, and they were allowed to do so.

That was about 1875 correct?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

That was about 1875 correct?

.

Yes.


.

 

[Mac-7]

.

Yes.

We had immigration laws in those days that your ancestors had to obey

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

We had immigration laws in those days that your ancestors had to obey

.

Well, When I made my post, I used the word LEGALLY to express this.

I'd NEVER support ANYONE coming to this country illegally.

In fact, I substantially donate to a charity effort to support pregnant women who want to avoid abortion and, in light of the administration cutting off funding to charities that support the illegals, I now need to ascertain that this charity is diligent about not accepting illegals. If I find that they are not doing their due diligence to weed out illegals, I will immediately stop my support of them and direct my support towards a similar charity that will prove to me that they respect my desires to not support illegal invaders in any way.

If I worded my post so clumsily as to render it easy to misunderstand, please accept my apology.

I enjoy your posts, and I hope that this eases your mind with regard to my feeling towards the illegal invasion.


.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Some of these psychotic Dems claimed the Cartels bring lots of money into the US, and by vilifying NARCOTERRORISTS, it is bad for the US economy.

Just hilarious.

How Labeling Cartels ‘Terrorists’ Could Hurt the U.S. Economy

Isolating U.S. companies from cartel activities could be almost impossible given that the criminal groups operate in sectors like agriculture and tourism, leaving some American businesses vulnerable to sanctions.

www.nytimes.com

What a load of horseshit. We should not stop the cartels from bringing drugs and violence to the US because it could be bad for the US economy.

 

[Rigby5]

Well, it looks like the cartel's sex and drug trafficking business has taken a billion-dollar hit thanks to President Trump.

Criminal activity in the area along the US-Mexico border includes gun battles, murder, armed robbery, carjacking, kidnapping, forced disappearances, extortion, and sexual assault.

"With the sudden end of the Biden-Harris open-border policies, the cartels are no longer making billions of dollars in human trafficking." - Michael Brown

Billion-dollar Mexican cartel ops disrupted by Trump's border crackdown as US issues do-not-travel warning

The U.S. State Department is warning travelers of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) found along dirt roads near an area of northeastern Mexico that borders McAllen, Texas.

www.foxnews.com

Fake news.
The drug trade does not use illegals crossing the border.
They hide drugs on ships, trucks, trains, etc., that are much safer.

And sex trafficking is just a silly claim.
There is no sex trafficking profits to be make south of the border, and the cartels have no control over the sex business north of the border.

 

[Rigby5]

OhPleaseJustQuit

I think many people do not realize how depraved the drug gangs are

They operate whore houses along the mexican border that feature children as young as 12

When the sex slaves become worn out and no longer making money they are taken out into the desert and killed

Nonsense.
The fact prostitution exists is due to poverty, not cartels.
Nor would any cartel members be able to survive if anyone thought they were killing innocents.
Hookers south of the border tend to be armed, since they are a easy target for robberies of cash that can't be reported to the police.

 

[Rigby5]

So, IOW -- Mexicans being Mexicans

That not only is false, but racist.

 

[Rigby5]

.

Well, When I made my post, I used the word LEGALLY to express this.

I'd NEVER support ANYONE coming to this country illegally.

In fact, I substantially donate to a charity effort to support pregnant women who want to avoid abortion and, in light of the administration cutting off funding to charities that support the illegals, I now need to ascertain that this charity is diligent about not accepting illegals. If I find that they are not doing their due diligence to weed out illegals, I will immediately stop my support of them and direct my support towards a similar charity that will prove to me that they respect my desires to not support illegal invaders in any way.

If I worded my post so clumsily as to render it easy to misunderstand, please accept my apology.

I enjoy your posts, and I hope that this eases your mind with regard to my feeling towards the illegal invasion.


.

If you read the treaties, like the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, is it illegal to prevent native border crossing at will. At least to the former Mexican states, like CA, AZ, NV, UT, CO, NM, TX, FL, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

Some of these psychotic Dems claimed the Cartels bring lots of money into the US, and by vilifying NARCOTERRORISTS, it is bad for the US economy.

Just hilarious.

How Labeling Cartels ‘Terrorists’ Could Hurt the U.S. Economy

Isolating U.S. companies from cartel activities could be almost impossible given that the criminal groups operate in sectors like agriculture and tourism, leaving some American businesses vulnerable to sanctions.

www.nytimes.com

What a load of horseshit. We should not stop the cartels from bringing drugs and violence to the US because it could be bad for the US economy.

I agree with you on that one.
Chinese drugs sold by Mexican cartels are going to drain US wealth.

But immigrant workers produce and buy, so do add to US wealth.

 

[Rigby5]

We cant adopt everyone and accept the world

We are not wealthier by fair or natural means.
We illegally install US backed dictators who divert their wealth to the US.
Like the low wages by United Fruit Company.
"Hey mister tally man, tally me banana".
Its actually slavery, but we do it outside the US to evade the law.

 

[ColonelAngus]

If you side with Mexican cartel narcoterrorists over the USA, YOU MIGHT BE A DUMB FUCK BRAINWASHED LEFTY POS.

 

[Rigby5]

Oh no!

Thats a terrible idea

Yeah, if we made Mexico a state, then we would have to pay them minimum wage, about 3 times what we pay them now.

 

[Rigby5]

If you side with Mexican cartel narcoterrorists over the USA, YOU MIGHT BE A DUMB FUCK BRAINWASHED LEFTY POS.

View attachment 1073687

The cartels are just supplying what the people want.
The police are illegally preventing people from getting what they want, and are imprisoning millions of innocents.

 

[Rigby5]

We had immigration laws in those days that your ancestors had to obey

Actually no.
There were pretty much open borders until we passed the illegal Chinese exclusion act.
There was no restrictions until after about 1900.
{...
Court rulings giving primacy to federal authority over immigration policy, and the Immigration Act of 1891. The Immigration Act of 1891 led to the establishment of the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and the opening of the Ellis Island inspection station in 1892. Constitutional authority (Article 1 §8) was later relied upon to enact the Naturalization Act of 1906 which standardized procedures for naturalization nationwide, and created the Bureau of Naturalization (initially joined with the Bureau of Immigration. Later from 1933 to 2003, both functions were part of the Immigration and Naturalization Service).
...}

 

[Mac-7]

Actually no.
There were pretty much open borders until we passed the illegal Chinese exclusion act.
There was no restrictions until after about 1900.
{...
Court rulings giving primacy to federal authority over immigration policy, and the Immigration Act of 1891. The Immigration Act of 1891 led to the establishment of the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and the opening of the Ellis Island inspection station in 1892. Constitutional authority (Article 1 §8) was later relied upon to enact the Naturalization Act of 1906 which standardized procedures for naturalization nationwide, and created the Bureau of Naturalization (initially joined with the Bureau of Immigration. Later from 1933 to 2003, both functions were part of the Immigration and Naturalization Service).
...}

Have you ever heard of Ellis Island?

We had strict immigration laws in the those days