Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dems are hating that free speech law again
I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
The problem with obscenity laws? Is they need to prove that they appeal to ‘prurient interest,’ or something of a sexual nature, making it, "filthy." I am not sure this rises to that definition.I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
yeah, until you tell the cop he's a piece of shit and he takes you away.The problem with obscenity laws? Is they need to prove that they appeal to ‘prurient interest,’ or something of a sexual nature, making it, "filthy." I am not sure this rises to that definition.I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
". . . Currently, obscenity is evaluated by federal and state courts alike using a tripartite standard established by Miller v. California. The Miller test for obscenity includes the following criteria: (1) whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ appeals to ‘prurient interest’ (2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law, and (3) whether the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.. . ."Obscenity
www.law.cornell.edu
I agree with the billboard ad but Trump and Pence would be there had Biden not stolen the election and given it to China..I wonder how many that find this funny accuse Democrats of suffering from TDS?
What is obscene about shit? Shit is shit, and I am sure you know that better than most.I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
While I do agree with you. . . when the other side depicted the President of the United States of America as this?I wonder how many that find this funny accuse Democrats of suffering from TDS?
Ask Kat she will tell you it is...To me it's no big deal but I am not everyone.What is obscene about shit? Shit is shit, and I am sure you know that better than most.I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
what is obscene about it?I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
Dems are hating that free speech law again
The word that is blotted out..Just like this program on USMB will deny you to spell out a certain word and it be seen.what is obscene about it?I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
yeah, until you tell the cop he's a piece of shit and he takes you away.The problem with obscenity laws? Is they need to prove that they appeal to ‘prurient interest,’ or something of a sexual nature, making it, "filthy." I am not sure this rises to that definition.I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
". . . Currently, obscenity is evaluated by federal and state courts alike using a tripartite standard established by Miller v. California. The Miller test for obscenity includes the following criteria: (1) whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ appeals to ‘prurient interest’ (2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law, and (3) whether the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.. . ."Obscenity
www.law.cornell.edu
I am a true Napoleonic code of laws kinda guy.yeah, until you tell the cop he's a piece of shit and he takes you away.The problem with obscenity laws? Is they need to prove that they appeal to ‘prurient interest,’ or something of a sexual nature, making it, "filthy." I am not sure this rises to that definition.I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
". . . Currently, obscenity is evaluated by federal and state courts alike using a tripartite standard established by Miller v. California. The Miller test for obscenity includes the following criteria: (1) whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ appeals to ‘prurient interest’ (2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law, and (3) whether the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.. . ."Obscenity
www.law.cornell.edu
I've noticed.I am a true Napoleonic code of laws kind guy.yeah, until you tell the cop he's a piece of shit and he takes you away.The problem with obscenity laws? Is they need to prove that they appeal to ‘prurient interest,’ or something of a sexual nature, making it, "filthy." I am not sure this rises to that definition.I thought the US had obscenity laws in advertising..No one's taking responsibility! Who'd a thunk it?
". . . Currently, obscenity is evaluated by federal and state courts alike using a tripartite standard established by Miller v. California. The Miller test for obscenity includes the following criteria: (1) whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ appeals to ‘prurient interest’ (2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law, and (3) whether the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.. . ."Obscenity
www.law.cornell.edu
Yeah, didn't need the Brits to do it!While I do agree with you. . . when the other side depicted the President of the United States of America as this?I wonder how many that find this funny accuse Democrats of suffering from TDS?
. . . as a nation, and a civilization, the conversation was doomed to degrade.
Now, I realized, this balloon was funded and made in Britain, but when they allowed it to be brought over here? And American media companies broadcast it all over the place?
That was pretty low and disrespectful to the office of the President.
That was, near as I can tell, when the gloves came off.