Bill O’Reilly DESTROYS ‘Liar’ David Corn, Mother Jones ‘Far-Left Zealots’

[Iceweasel]

Libs can't win on ideas so this is what they do.

 

[BULLDOG]

John Hawkins runs Right Wing News, Linkiest and is the co-owner of The Looking Spoon. He also does weekly appearances on the #1 in it’s market Jaz McKay show, writes a weekly column for Townhall and his work has also been published at the Washington Examiner, The Hill, Hot Air, Pajamas Media, and at Human Events.

Additionally, he’s also the blogosphere’s premier interviewer and has interviewed conservatives like Thomas Sowell, Mark Levin, Victor Davis Hanson, Mark Steyn, G. Gordon Liddy, Dick Morris, Karl Rove, Michael Steele, Milton Friedman, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint, Jonah Goldberg, Jim DeMint, Walter Williams, Robert Novak, Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, & Michelle Malkin among others.

Additionally, John Hawkins’ work has been linked and discussed in numerous publications and on TV and radio shows including ABC News, BusinessWeek, C-Span, The Chicago Tribune, CNN, Countdown with Keith Olbermann, Editor & Publisher, Fox News, Hannity and Colmes, The Laura Ingraham Show, Minneapolis Star Tribune, MSNBC, National Journal, National Post, Newsmax, Newsweek, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Tammy Bruce Show, Time Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, The Hugh Hewitt Show, The Washington Post, Salt Lake Tribune, Scarborough Country, U.S. News & World Report, WorldNetDaily and Human Events, where he had a weekly column. Right Wing News has been studied by college classes and even inspired an urban legend that was covered at Snopes.

Last but not least, John Hawkins also founded and led the Rightroots group, a grassroots effort that collected almost $300,000 for Republican candidates in the last 3 months of the 2006 election cycle. In 2008, he consulted for Duncan Hunter’s presidential campaign and was on the board of Slatecard, which raised more than $600,000 for Republican candidates in the 2008 election cycle. In 2006 and 2010, he led a blogosphere wide Google Bomb effort against Democrati candidates. In 2011, he helped found Raising Red, although he left the organization the same year and went on to become one of the co-founders of Not Mitt Romney.com. In 2013, he teamed up Jimmy LaSalvia to lead a boycott of Capital One for having Alex Baldwin as their spokesman.


can you say totally bias ....I knewe you could.

And your point is?

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

Why would you want a counterpoint from a source whose known purpose is to lie about unflattering claims? That is not a valid source for discovering facts about anything. I'm not talking about common mistakes in facts, which are corrected, or just trying to put things in the best light.

 

[BULLDOG]

Libs can't win on ideas so this is what they do.

Nice try, but that doesn't excuse the lies Billo told.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

John Hawkins runs Right Wing News, Linkiest and is the co-owner of The Looking Spoon. He also does weekly appearances on the #1 in it’s market Jaz McKay show, writes a weekly column for Townhall and his work has also been published at the Washington Examiner, The Hill, Hot Air, Pajamas Media, and at Human Events.

Additionally, he’s also the blogosphere’s premier interviewer and has interviewed conservatives like Thomas Sowell, Mark Levin, Victor Davis Hanson, Mark Steyn, G. Gordon Liddy, Dick Morris, Karl Rove, Michael Steele, Milton Friedman, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint, Jonah Goldberg, Jim DeMint, Walter Williams, Robert Novak, Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, & Michelle Malkin among others.

Additionally, John Hawkins’ work has been linked and discussed in numerous publications and on TV and radio shows including ABC News, BusinessWeek, C-Span, The Chicago Tribune, CNN, Countdown with Keith Olbermann, Editor & Publisher, Fox News, Hannity and Colmes, The Laura Ingraham Show, Minneapolis Star Tribune, MSNBC, National Journal, National Post, Newsmax, Newsweek, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Tammy Bruce Show, Time Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, The Hugh Hewitt Show, The Washington Post, Salt Lake Tribune, Scarborough Country, U.S. News & World Report, WorldNetDaily and Human Events, where he had a weekly column. Right Wing News has been studied by college classes and even inspired an urban legend that was covered at Snopes.

Last but not least, John Hawkins also founded and led the Rightroots group, a grassroots effort that collected almost $300,000 for Republican candidates in the last 3 months of the 2006 election cycle. In 2008, he consulted for Duncan Hunter’s presidential campaign and was on the board of Slatecard, which raised more than $600,000 for Republican candidates in the 2008 election cycle. In 2006 and 2010, he led a blogosphere wide Google Bomb effort against Democrati candidates. In 2011, he helped found Raising Red, although he left the organization the same year and went on to become one of the co-founders of Not Mitt Romney.com. In 2013, he teamed up Jimmy LaSalvia to lead a boycott of Capital One for having Alex Baldwin as their spokesman.


can you say totally bias ....I knewe you could.

And your point is?

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

Why would you want a counterpoint from a source whose known purpose is to lie about unflattering claims? That is not a valid source for discovering facts about anything. I'm not talking about common mistakes in facts, which are corrected, or just trying to put things in the best light.

What are you talking about? I'm talking about more comprehensive analysis and not just one overblown story driven by a political agenda. My point is that analysis is necessary to make sure what you get from mainstream sources is not only accurate but complete. And if you don't do that you become significantly misinformed and conditioned.

 

[daws101]

John Hawkins runs Right Wing News, Linkiest and is the co-owner of The Looking Spoon. He also does weekly appearances on the #1 in it’s market Jaz McKay show, writes a weekly column for Townhall and his work has also been published at the Washington Examiner, The Hill, Hot Air, Pajamas Media, and at Human Events.

Additionally, he’s also the blogosphere’s premier interviewer and has interviewed conservatives like Thomas Sowell, Mark Levin, Victor Davis Hanson, Mark Steyn, G. Gordon Liddy, Dick Morris, Karl Rove, Michael Steele, Milton Friedman, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint, Jonah Goldberg, Jim DeMint, Walter Williams, Robert Novak, Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, & Michelle Malkin among others.

Additionally, John Hawkins’ work has been linked and discussed in numerous publications and on TV and radio shows including ABC News, BusinessWeek, C-Span, The Chicago Tribune, CNN, Countdown with Keith Olbermann, Editor & Publisher, Fox News, Hannity and Colmes, The Laura Ingraham Show, Minneapolis Star Tribune, MSNBC, National Journal, National Post, Newsmax, Newsweek, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Tammy Bruce Show, Time Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, The Hugh Hewitt Show, The Washington Post, Salt Lake Tribune, Scarborough Country, U.S. News & World Report, WorldNetDaily and Human Events, where he had a weekly column. Right Wing News has been studied by college classes and even inspired an urban legend that was covered at Snopes.

Last but not least, John Hawkins also founded and led the Rightroots group, a grassroots effort that collected almost $300,000 for Republican candidates in the last 3 months of the 2006 election cycle. In 2008, he consulted for Duncan Hunter’s presidential campaign and was on the board of Slatecard, which raised more than $600,000 for Republican candidates in the 2008 election cycle. In 2006 and 2010, he led a blogosphere wide Google Bomb effort against Democrati candidates. In 2011, he helped found Raising Red, although he left the organization the same year and went on to become one of the co-founders of Not Mitt Romney.com. In 2013, he teamed up Jimmy LaSalvia to lead a boycott of Capital One for having Alex Baldwin as their spokesman.


can you say totally bias ....I knewe you could.

And your point is?

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

thanks for proving my point...conservatives prefer fantasy over reality...

You obviously didn't read or understand my post.

false! your post, as I said just proves my point..

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And your point is?

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

thanks for proving my point...conservatives prefer fantasy over reality...

You obviously didn't read or understand my post.

false! your post, as I said just proves my point..

Then you'd better explain. I offered lots of detail. You need to do the same if you want your protest to get any real consideration.

 

[daws101]

Libs can't win on ideas so this is what they do.

now that is funny!

conservatives have never had an original idea. Other than the false idea that they are in the right.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Libs can't win on ideas so this is what they do.

Ain't that the truth. They get stifled by points and analysis and facts and have to resort to disparagement.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Libs can't win on ideas so this is what they do.

now that is funny!

conservatives have never had an original idea. Other than the false idea that they are in the right.

Then why don't you cite the specifics you disagree with?

 

[BULLDOG]

John Hawkins runs Right Wing News, Linkiest and is the co-owner of The Looking Spoon. He also does weekly appearances on the #1 in it’s market Jaz McKay show, writes a weekly column for Townhall and his work has also been published at the Washington Examiner, The Hill, Hot Air, Pajamas Media, and at Human Events.

Additionally, he’s also the blogosphere’s premier interviewer and has interviewed conservatives like Thomas Sowell, Mark Levin, Victor Davis Hanson, Mark Steyn, G. Gordon Liddy, Dick Morris, Karl Rove, Michael Steele, Milton Friedman, Ron Paul, Jim DeMint, Jonah Goldberg, Jim DeMint, Walter Williams, Robert Novak, Ann Coulter, Newt Gingrich, & Michelle Malkin among others.

Additionally, John Hawkins’ work has been linked and discussed in numerous publications and on TV and radio shows including ABC News, BusinessWeek, C-Span, The Chicago Tribune, CNN, Countdown with Keith Olbermann, Editor & Publisher, Fox News, Hannity and Colmes, The Laura Ingraham Show, Minneapolis Star Tribune, MSNBC, National Journal, National Post, Newsmax, Newsweek, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Tammy Bruce Show, Time Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, The Hugh Hewitt Show, The Washington Post, Salt Lake Tribune, Scarborough Country, U.S. News & World Report, WorldNetDaily and Human Events, where he had a weekly column. Right Wing News has been studied by college classes and even inspired an urban legend that was covered at Snopes.

Last but not least, John Hawkins also founded and led the Rightroots group, a grassroots effort that collected almost $300,000 for Republican candidates in the last 3 months of the 2006 election cycle. In 2008, he consulted for Duncan Hunter’s presidential campaign and was on the board of Slatecard, which raised more than $600,000 for Republican candidates in the 2008 election cycle. In 2006 and 2010, he led a blogosphere wide Google Bomb effort against Democrati candidates. In 2011, he helped found Raising Red, although he left the organization the same year and went on to become one of the co-founders of Not Mitt Romney.com. In 2013, he teamed up Jimmy LaSalvia to lead a boycott of Capital One for having Alex Baldwin as their spokesman.


can you say totally bias ....I knewe you could.

And your point is?

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

Why would you want a counterpoint from a source whose known purpose is to lie about unflattering claims? That is not a valid source for discovering facts about anything. I'm not talking about common mistakes in facts, which are corrected, or just trying to put things in the best light.

What are you talking about? I'm talking about more comprehensive analysis and not just one overblown story driven by a political agenda. My point is that analysis is necessary to make sure what you get from mainstream sources is not only accurate but complete. And if you don't do that you become significantly misinformed and conditioned.

So you are saying the GOP version of Baghdad Bob should be one of those sources?

 

[daws101]

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

thanks for proving my point...conservatives prefer fantasy over reality...

You obviously didn't read or understand my post.

false! your post, as I said just proves my point..

Then you'd better explain. I offered lots of detail. You need to do the same if you want your protest to get any real consideration.

lol! consideration by you? talk about meaninglessness .
better break this to you now as it seem no one else has.. your opining on this or any subject is Unnecessary
your details are spewed shit....

 

[daws101]

Libs can't win on ideas so this is what they do.

now that is funny!

conservatives have never had an original idea. Other than the false idea that they are in the right.

Then why don't you cite the specifics you disagree with?

do you not understand the term "all" or everything, those are specific ...

 

[Rozman]

Bill O's ratings must have gone up recently....
That's why so many threads on him here.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And your point is?

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

Why would you want a counterpoint from a source whose known purpose is to lie about unflattering claims? That is not a valid source for discovering facts about anything. I'm not talking about common mistakes in facts, which are corrected, or just trying to put things in the best light.

What are you talking about? I'm talking about more comprehensive analysis and not just one overblown story driven by a political agenda. My point is that analysis is necessary to make sure what you get from mainstream sources is not only accurate but complete. And if you don't do that you become significantly misinformed and conditioned.

So you are saying the GOP version of Baghdad Bob should be one of those sources?

That's your unexplained and biased take. Now explain why anyone is a GOP Baghdad Bob.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Not big BO fan; but he's right. The left media doesn't care about their destruction.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

thanks for proving my point...conservatives prefer fantasy over reality...

You obviously didn't read or understand my post.

false! your post, as I said just proves my point..

Then you'd better explain. I offered lots of detail. You need to do the same if you want your protest to get any real consideration.

lol! consideration by you? talk about meaninglessness .
better break this to you now as it seem no one else has.. your opining on this or any subject is Unnecessary
your details are spewed shit....

You still haven't explained. Just disparagement.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Libs can't win on ideas so this is what they do.

now that is funny!

conservatives have never had an original idea. Other than the false idea that they are in the right.

Then why don't you cite the specifics you disagree with?

do you not understand the term "all" or everything, those are specific ...

Another stifled lefty. Moving along...

 

[daws101]

thanks for proving my point...conservatives prefer fantasy over reality...

You obviously didn't read or understand my post.

false! your post, as I said just proves my point..

Then you'd better explain. I offered lots of detail. You need to do the same if you want your protest to get any real consideration.

lol! consideration by you? talk about meaninglessness .
better break this to you now as it seem no one else has.. your opining on this or any subject is Unnecessary
your details are spewed shit....

You still haven't explained. Just disparagement.

your opining on this or any subject is Unnecessary

 

[BULLDOG]

The point is that John Hawkins, the writer of the article in the OP, is a rabid right wing partisan hack. His function is to be the GOP's version of Baghdad Bob, and spread misrepresented propaganda in the hope that people will believe him instead of the facts right in front of them.

The greater point is where else are you going to get that counterpoint from? Mainstream media is in the tank for the left institutionally and overtly. Smart people vet the news by relying on right wing sites for perspective because they already get pounded by left wing perspective without having to try.

Why would you want a counterpoint from a source whose known purpose is to lie about unflattering claims? That is not a valid source for discovering facts about anything. I'm not talking about common mistakes in facts, which are corrected, or just trying to put things in the best light.

What are you talking about? I'm talking about more comprehensive analysis and not just one overblown story driven by a political agenda. My point is that analysis is necessary to make sure what you get from mainstream sources is not only accurate but complete. And if you don't do that you become significantly misinformed and conditioned.

So you are saying the GOP version of Baghdad Bob should be one of those sources?

That's your unexplained and biased take. Now explain why anyone is a GOP Baghdad Bob.

Post #6

 

[daws101]