Bill Maher: New Rules for Teabaggers

[Madeline]

956 posts about some perceived slight from Obama. Never mind the REAL injuries he is dealing out, eh? This is what is called "pissing into the wind".

Meanwhile, which one of you even bothered to reach out and touch your Congressmen to call a halt to passage of HR 4213, so as to head off a 400% increase in the Federal Gas Tax?

What a bunch of fucking hypocrites. Some of you just enjoy any reason to batter one another and could give a flip about this country. If all you can do is come here to whine about whatever Glenn Beck has wound you up to say that day, what interest do you expect to arouse in moderates or undecideds?

If you aren't posting hoping to persuade readers, you're just doing it to decorate your pc with pixels. That, my friends, is called making white noise on the 'net.

 

[HUGGY]

Obama Liberal Hypocrite watch. Calls for "Civility" but then calls us "teabaggers."


Isn't that more civil than calling you what you really are?..Cocksuckers?

 

[Madeline]

Obama Liberal Hypocrite watch. Calls for "Civility" but then calls us "teabaggers."


Isn't that more civil than calling you what you really are?..Cocksuckers?

Okay, now that was funny. Way too harsh, but definately worth a giggle.

Thankies, Huggy.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Does anybody involved in this verbal clusterfuck even know how many posts one might have to go back to discovery WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT????????

Dr. has made some points, si modo and boedicca are acting like reactionary fools, and all is normal on the eastern front.

Correction. Smith has parroted and thinks he has added something original and of consequence to the thread.

He has yet to make an original point of significance.

And, I mock him and will continue to mock him for that. I am a patient person that way.

You are indeed a patient troll.

 

[Madeline]

Dr. has made some points, si modo and boedicca are acting like reactionary fools, and all is normal on the eastern front.

Correction. Smith has parroted and thinks he has added something original and of consequence to the thread.

He has yet to make an original point of significance.

And, I mock him and will continue to mock him for that. I am a patient person that way.

You are indeed a patient troll.

You have No idea, JakeStakey. Si modo runs after me all over USMB crying like a little girl, or so I thought before I sent him/her/it/them to the Iggy Bin. From what I can tell, he/she/it/they still do.

Evidentially Si modo's "devotion" is the USMB equivalent of stepping in dog shit.

 

[drsmith1072]

Liar.

I kow you are and have proven you to be a liar througout this thread.




except for everything as you desperately try to attack me personally and avoid what I actually said.



and yet i havehad several original points including the one concerning when obama actually called for civility in reference to his use of the term "tea-bagger" and you avoided that point claiming that i parroted it and yet when asked you failed to prove that i parroted it. You merely repeated that false claim over and over again to avoid a debate that you realized that you could never win.

Until then, I mock you.

and yet I am laughing at you. your ignorance and cowardice are quite entertaining.

As I said, you have no point. Until you bring up an original point that I have yet to address, I mock you.

I've asked you for pages on end to make your point. You have yet to do so.

And, I mock your idiocy because of that.

and once again you ignore the content of my post as you pretend that i have made no point so you can troll and in your own words "mock" me. However all you succeed in doing is make yourself look foolish and expose yourself as nothing but a dishonest trolling hack.

and yet i have had several original points including the one concerning when obama actually called for civility in reference to his use of the term "tea-bagger" and you avoided that point claiming that i parroted it and yet when asked you failed to prove that i parroted it. You merely repeated that false claim over and over again to avoid a debate that you realized that you could never win.

My point about the timeline above PROVES the OP was lying about the timeline when it made this claim

But this is so typically liberals. Out of one side of his mouth he calls for "civility" and two days later calls us "tea baggers."

and you dishonestly claimed that I parrioted that argument while providing ZERO proof that I did when all it would take is you posting a link to a single post that came before mine where that argument was made and you ran away from proving your claim and continue to do so.
My guess is that you would rather be dishonest than admit that you were and are WRONG. LOL

Please respond to the content IF you can.

P.S. Just so you know, claiming that I parroted that argument when I did NOT and when you ahve failed to prove that I have is not addressing the argument. However, thanks for more of your usual dishoenst spin.

 

[drsmith1072]

Does anybody involved in this verbal clusterfuck even know how many posts one might have to go back to discovery WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT????????

Dr. has made some points, si modo and boedicca are acting like reactionary fools, and all is normal on the eastern front.

Correction. Smith has parroted and thinks he has added something original and of consequence to the thread.

He has yet to make an original point of significance.

And, I mock him and will continue to mock him for that. I am a patient person that way.

Aww more of your baseless personal attacks. can you stop running away and actually address the content of my posts instead making the false blanket claim that I parroted every argument that I have made??

Or is asking you to be honest for a change too much to ask of you??

The sad thing is now he spins that I have made original points but in his opinions even though he has failed to address them they not of significance. LOL

So for some reason he believes that despite the fact that the point he calls insignificant proved to OP was being dishonest when he claimed

But this is so typically liberals. Out of one side of his mouth he calls for "civility" and two days later calls us "tea baggers."

and yet according to the OP's own source obama made the comment about "tea-baggers" back in 09 and the call for civility in question was made at the beginning of may.

The timeline shows that the OP was WRONG and now Simodo is claiming that point is not significant so he can try to justify avoiding it again since he can't prove that I parroted it because I didn't. LOL

As far as parroting goes he can't even prove that I parroted anything but that doesn't stop him from making that claim so he can attack me personally.

Now watch how he avoids the content and attacks me personally AGAIN. LOL

 

[Si modo]

Correction. Smith has parroted and thinks he has added something original and of consequence to the thread.

He has yet to make an original point of significance.

And, I mock him and will continue to mock him for that. I am a patient person that way.

You are indeed a patient troll.

You have No idea, JakeStakey. Si modo runs after me all over USMB crying like a little girl, or so I thought before I sent him/her/it/them to the Iggy Bin. From what I can tell, he/she/it/they still do.

Evidentially Si modo's "devotion" is the USMB equivalent of stepping in dog shit.

If only you really would ignore me.

Please, don't just lie about it, do it.

Thanks in advance.

 

[Si modo]

Dr. has made some points, si modo and boedicca are acting like reactionary fools, and all is normal on the eastern front.

Correction. Smith has parroted and thinks he has added something original and of consequence to the thread.

He has yet to make an original point of significance.

And, I mock him and will continue to mock him for that. I am a patient person that way.

Aww more of your baseless personal attacks. can you stop running away and actually address the content of my posts instead making the false blanket claim that I parroted every argument that I have made??

Or is asking you to be honest for a change too much to ask of you??

The sad thing is now he spins that I have made original points but in his opinions even though he has failed to address them they not of significance. LOL

So for some reason he believes that despite the fact that the point he calls insignificant proved to OP was being dishonest when he claimed

But this is so typically liberals. Out of one side of his mouth he calls for "civility" and two days later calls us "tea baggers."

and yet according to the OP's own source obama made the comment about "tea-baggers" back in 09 and the call for civility in question was made at the beginning of may.

The timeline shows that the OP was WRONG and now Simodo is claiming that point is not significant so he can try to justify avoiding it again since he can't prove that I parroted it because I didn't. LOL

As far as parroting goes he can't even prove that I parroted anything but that doesn't stop him from making that claim so he can attack me personally.

Now watch how he avoids the content and attacks me personally AGAIN. LOL

Bo-ring. Make a point, will you?

 

[drsmith1072]

Correction. Smith has parroted and thinks he has added something original and of consequence to the thread.

He has yet to make an original point of significance.

And, I mock him and will continue to mock him for that. I am a patient person that way.

Aww more of your baseless personal attacks. can you stop running away and actually address the content of my posts instead making the false blanket claim that I parroted every argument that I have made??

Or is asking you to be honest for a change too much to ask of you??

The sad thing is now he spins that I have made original points but in his opinions even though he has failed to address them they not of significance. LOL

So for some reason he believes that despite the fact that the point he calls insignificant proved to OP was being dishonest when he claimed

But this is so typically liberals. Out of one side of his mouth he calls for "civility" and two days later calls us "tea baggers."

and yet according to the OP's own source obama made the comment about "tea-baggers" back in 09 and the call for civility in question was made at the beginning of may.

The timeline shows that the OP was WRONG and now Simodo is claiming that point is not significant so he can try to justify avoiding it again since he can't prove that I parroted it because I didn't. LOL

As far as parroting goes he can't even prove that I parroted anything but that doesn't stop him from making that claim so he can attack me personally.

Now watch how he avoids the content and attacks me personally AGAIN. LOL

Bo-ring. Make a point, will you?

I did make a point and you did just as I predicted you would do and you avoided the content AGAIN.

How typical of you.

Thanks for being your usual cowardly and dishonest self. LOL

Now how about you respond to the content TROLL?

 

[Si modo]

Aww more of your baseless personal attacks. can you stop running away and actually address the content of my posts instead making the false blanket claim that I parroted every argument that I have made??

Or is asking you to be honest for a change too much to ask of you??

The sad thing is now he spins that I have made original points but in his opinions even though he has failed to address them they not of significance. LOL

So for some reason he believes that despite the fact that the point he calls insignificant proved to OP was being dishonest when he claimed



and yet according to the OP's own source obama made the comment about "tea-baggers" back in 09 and the call for civility in question was made at the beginning of may.

The timeline shows that the OP was WRONG and now Simodo is claiming that point is not significant so he can try to justify avoiding it again since he can't prove that I parroted it because I didn't. LOL

As far as parroting goes he can't even prove that I parroted anything but that doesn't stop him from making that claim so he can attack me personally.

Now watch how he avoids the content and attacks me personally AGAIN. LOL

Bo-ring. Make a point, will you?

I did make a point and you did just as I predicted you would do and you avoided the content AGAIN.

How typical of you.

Thanks for being your usual cowardly and dishonest self. LOL

Now how about you respond to the content TROLL?

No.

I'll type slowly.

Do

you

have

something

original and/or of consequence

to

add

that hasn't already been addressed?


I keep asking for something, and you keep whining.

You have no point and you keep demonstrating that you have no point. I mock you.

 

[Madeline]

Si modo wrote:

I mock you.

Uh, not so much Si modo. You seem to be the asshole here, though I wll admit it looks as if drsmith is arguing with a lunatic, and most sane folks avoid that.

 

[Si modo]

Si modo wrote:

I mock you.

Uh, not so much Si modo. You seem to be the asshole here, though I wll admit it looks as if drsmith is arguing with a lunatic, and most sane folks avoid that.

How's that ignoring working for ya?

LMAO!

 

[Bfgrn]

i wonder if i go break into a bank and steal money ...will the headline read....bank robbed


or pagan/witch robs bank...come on people....nutters are just that...nutters....some latch on to causes ...is that the causes fault...or just a plain nutter fact?

Really bones??? These 'bank robbers' are writing party platforms and selecting candidates to run in public elections. It is CLEAR these people believe in one freedom...freedom to conform to THEIR far right beliefs of have your property vandalized, destroyed or stolen.

The headline SHOULD read: "Nazis take over Maine GOP"

 

[Madeline]

Better than your bullshit, sneaky neg repping.

Hi, you have received -125 reputation points from Si modo.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
Moron.

Regards,
Si modo

Though being negged by you is a priviledge and an honor, I admit.

 

[Nosmo King]

Doubtless the defense here will be that The One wasn’t aware of the sexual connotation and therefore had no idea that the term offends tea partiers. Funny thing, though: Offhand, I can’t recall a single instance of him saying “teabaggers” publicly. Not in speeches, not in interviews, not at town halls, not even at that fundraiser a few weeks ago when he goofed on protesters by saying they should be thanking him for cutting their taxes, i.e. for running up gigantic deficits. If he doesn’t know the term’s impolitic, how come he hasn’t innocently used it on camera yet?
He knows. They all know.

In Jonathan Alter’s “The Promise: President Obama, Year One,” President Obama is quoted in an interview saying that the unanimous vote of House Republicans vote against the stimulus bills “set the tenor for the whole year … That helped to create the tea-baggers and empowered that whole wing of the Republican Party to where it now controls the agenda for the Republicans.”

Tea Party activists loath the term “tea baggers,” which has emerged in liberal media outlets and elsewhere as a method of mocking the activists and their concerns.​

Hot Air Good news: Obama using the word “teabaggers” now

​

Now As USUAL, Obama is right and wrong. The stimulus is part of what created the Tea Party. But it wasn't the Republicans being against it, it was the fact it was voted into law DESPITE people like me and you calling our Congressman and Senators and telling them NOT to vote for it, and they voted for it ANYWAY. Jerks!

Typical that Obama has it backwards.

But this is so typically liberals. Out of one side of his mouth he calls for "civility" and two days later calls us "tea baggers."

This reminds me of the liberal op who once demanded of me "in the interests of civility" not to use the word liberal. But not five minutes later, he called conservatives, KKKonservatives.

When I pointed out this hypocrisy, he was furious.

"Civility" to a liberal means YOU can't say anything critical about THEM. It doesn't mean they can't say anything they want about YOU.

After all, THEY, the all high liberal, are the elite and soooooooooooooooooooo above you. It's "uncivil" to criticize them.

YOU, however, are the plebes. You are the proletariat. YOU are the peasants. You can't expect the same civility demanded of YOU towards liberals to be directed back at you YOU.

YOU are a peasant and it's for your own "good" they call you every name in the book. Maybe you will finally see your eeeeeeeeevil ways and become liberal!!!!!!

The arrogance and pompous hypocrisy is so thick you can cut it with a knife.



​

Dear hyper-populist idots,

If the President had called you "Children of God" you would still be pissed off. Being pissed off is your raisson d'etre. If you call the President "The One", or "the Messiah" or attempt, in very silly ways, to de-legitimize him or his administration then demand civility, one is forced to assess the real definition of hypocrisy.

Carry on,

Nosmo King

a voice of reason in an unreasonable world

 

[Si modo]

Better than your bullshit, sneaky neg repping.

Hi, you have received -125 reputation points from Si modo.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
Moron.

Regards,
Si modo

Though being negged by you is a priviledge and an honor, I admit.

What's better? My post? The ones you're ignoring? LMAO!

Nothing sneaky about my rep, moron. See, morons proclaim they ignore and never do. Now, if I were to be sneaky about a rep, I would proclaim I was ignoring your posts, then rep one of them.

My rep was spot on. Moron.

And, FYI. When you want to whine about a rep, whiner, there is a forum for it. Thanks.

 

[Madeline]

N

osmo King wrote:

Dear hyper-populist idots,

If the President had called you "Children of God" you would still be pissed off. Being pissed off is your raisson d'etre. If you call the President "The One", or "the Messiah" or attempt, in very silly ways, to de-legitimize him or his administration then demand civility, one is forced to assess the real definition of hypocrisy.

Carry on,

Nosmo King

a voice of reason in an unreasonable world
__________________
If you ever catch on fire, try to avoid seeing yourself in the mirror, because I bet that's what REALLY throws you into a panic.~ Jack Handy

'Tis better to have loved and lost that to have loved and caught something.~ Too Much Coffee Guy

I do so enjoy being taken to the woodshed for my manners by folks who feel free to call me every name in the book because I do not worship Walmart.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/116779-photo-this-single-photo-encapsultes-all-conservative-values.html

Once again, hear me folks: I would LOVE to see the GOP cede its position to the Tea Baggers Movement, but to become a legitimate player in national politics you must eject the wingnuts, clean up YOUR act and stop carrying on like your hair's aflame over dipshit that does not matter.

 

[Nosmo King]

Madeline~

Wal*Mart? Walk me through it, darling. I responded to a crazy tea bagger and now you're bringing Wal*Mart.

 

[Si modo]

Madeline~

Wal*Mart? Walk me through it, darling. I responded to a crazy tea bagger and now you're bringing Wal*Mart.

I'm curious as well. I do enjoy watching the outfield, but this is far beyond coming from there.