Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 34,560
- 27,540
- 2,915
- Thread starter
- #21
what % of the time are they right?
even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally
Apparently quite a high percentage as shown by the crime stats being cut drastically when it was instituted. Since De Blasio stopped it crime has risen. So, I guess most of the time law enforcement was right.
Education for you...
"1. What is stop-and-frisk? According to Cornell University Law School, stop-and-frisk involves the police stopping people when there is "a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed" and then patting them down to see if they have a weapon on them."
"2. Stop-and-frisk is one of the reason's for New York City's sharp decline in crime. According to Heather Mac Donald, murders declined almost 80 percent and major felonies by almost 75 percent from the early 1990's to 2013 thanks to "proactive policing," which includes the practice of stop-and-frisk."
5 Things You Need To Know About 'Stop-And-Frisk'
Nowhere do I see the percentages of the outcomes for all stops.
What if they are right 14 % of the time?
What if they are right 95% of the time? Would you decry the other 5%? You seem to think we live in an occupied country. Where do you get these ideas?
We have no idea what % they are right.
If they were right 95 % of the time that does not seem random.
But we have no basis for judgement.
The ideas come from my brain bruh.
Yes we do because the crime rate dropped during stop and frisk and increased after De Blasio stopped the practice. What evidence do you have that the cops were right only 14% of the time...Hint...Ideas from your id don't count.