Bill Barr threatens to jump off bridge if Trump wins 2024

[Concerned American]

Lawyers prefer to settle out of court, something Trump never does.

And how is that relevant to a lawyer taking a case on contingency. Please make the attempt to keep up.

 

[alang1216]

And how is that relevant to a lawyer taking a case on contingency. Please make the attempt to keep up.

No lawyer would take against Trump on contingency. Trump has a reputation for never settling and delaying and he has deep pockets (or at least his donors do).

 

[Concerned American]

No lawyer would take against Trump on contingency. Trump has a reputation for never settling and delaying and he has deep pockets (or at least his donors do).

LMAO, yeah he doesn't go hat in hand asking for someone to finance a dubious claim that is thirty years old that won't stand the test of a criminal trial. Try again. You're grasping at straws.

 

[alang1216]

LMAO, yeah he doesn't go hat in hand asking for someone to finance a dubious claim that is thirty years old that won't stand the test of a criminal trial. Try again. You're grasping at straws.

I couldn't find out who is paying for those lawyers. Do you know or are you just making stuff up again?

 

[Concerned American]

I couldn't find out who is paying for those lawyers. Do you know or are you just making stuff up again?

You asked for a link, I provided it. READ IT.

 

[alang1216]

You asked for a link, I provided it. READ IT.

Untrue. The link you provided only talks about who paid Carroll's lawyers NOT who paid Trump's lawyers. Did I miss it or is this more make believe?

 

[Concerned American]

Untrue. The link you provided only talks about who paid Carroll's lawyers NOT who paid Trump's lawyers. Did I miss it or is this more make believe?

Maybe you should learn to write concise replies. Please show me where you asked about Trump's legal fees. This is your post #144
I couldn't find out who is paying for those lawyers. Do you know or are you just making stuff up again?
Not that it makes any difference--he was defending himself--not trying to get money from a 30 year old "he said, she said" that had no evidence of a crime committed.

 

[alang1216]

Maybe you should learn to write concise replies. Please show me where you asked about Trump's legal fees.

Maybe reading comprehension is something you need to learn:

No lawyer would take (a case) against Trump on contingency. Trump has a reputation for never settling and delaying and he has deep pockets (or at least his donors do).

LMAO, yeah he doesn't go hat in hand asking for someone to finance a dubious claim that is thirty years old that won't stand the test of a criminal trial. Try again. You're grasping at straws.

This is your post #144
I couldn't find out who is paying for those lawyers. Do you know or are you just making stuff up again?
Not that it makes any difference--he was defending himself--not trying to get money from a 30 year old "he said, she said" that had no evidence of a crime committed.

Yet a judge and jury found just the opposite. Did you study the court case or just made stuff up yet again?

 

[Concerned American]

Maybe reading comprehension is something you need to learn:




Yet a judge and jury found just the opposite. Did you study the court case or just made stuff up yet again?

Civil case with a judge that should have been recused and it does not have to be a unanimous decision. Only 5 of 6 jurors must decide if a preponderance of evidence suggests in the plaintiffs favor. Criminal must be unanimous and the standard of proof is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Different standards, moron. Thanks for putting your self portrait up for all to see.

 

[alang1216]

Civil case with a judge that should have been recused and it does not have to be a unanimous decision. Only 5 of 6 jurors must decide if a preponderance of evidence suggests in the plaintiffs favor. Criminal must be unanimous and the standard of proof is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Different standards, moron. Thanks for putting your self portrait up for all to see.

Guilty is guilty. He may never pay the settlement but he can't be happy about the cost of his lawyers. Justice of a sort. And we still don't know if it is him paying his lawyers or his donors.

 

[Concerned American]

Guilty is guilty. He may never pay the settlement but he can't be happy about the cost of his lawyers. Justice of a sort. And we still don't know if it is him paying his lawyers or his donors.

The result of a civil trial is not guilt moron. Maybe you should climb out of the basement of that shithouse and learn about things you comment on before you make a complete fool of yourself. As for who pays for his defense--maybe it was pro bono. Maybe his donors paid for it, it is irrelevant. What is not irrelevant is who is the money behind bringing a civil suit that he has to defend. I visualize Trump getting some major awards to cover the cost of his defense when all of these political prosecutions come up empty handed.

 

[alang1216]

The result of a civil trial is not guilt moron. Maybe you should climb out of the basement of that shithouse and learn about things you comment on before you make a complete fool of yourself. As for who pays for his defense--maybe it was pro bono. Maybe his donors paid for it, it is irrelevant. What is not irrelevant is who is the money behind bringing a civil suit that he has to defend. I visualize Trump getting some major awards to cover the cost of his defense when all of these political prosecutions come up empty handed.

I think it is fair to say the jury found him guilty of sexual abuse and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. You can call it whatever legal term you wish but to my way of thinking, he was found guilty.

I wouldn't get my hope up for him getting off. There is plenty of evidence in the indictments and it is a jury that will decide his fate not a bunch of cowed Republicans politicians.

 

[Concerned American]

I think it is fair to say the jury found him guilty of sexual abuse

You think wrong. The biased NY jury found him LIABLE for sexual abuse with no evidence. The leftist judge interjected her own opinion which also influenced the jury. It was a he said she said that would not stand the test of a criminal charge because there was no evidence. Likely that she'll never see a penny.

 

[alang1216]

You think wrong. The biased NY jury found him LIABLE for sexual abuse with no evidence. The leftist judge interjected her own opinion which also influenced the jury. It was a he said she said that would not stand the test of a criminal charge because there was no evidence. Likely that she'll never see a penny.

Yet another conspiracy to undermine the noble Trump. I'm sure the other 25 women who accused him of sexual misconduct were lying and he only settled a couple of the cases because he felt sorry for his accusers.

 

[Concerned American]

Yet another conspiracy to undermine the noble Trump. I'm sure the other 25 women who accused him of sexual misconduct were lying and he only settled a couple of the cases because he felt sorry for his accusers.

LINKIE

 

[alang1216]

LINKIE

Never heard of Wikipedia? Or Fox?

 

[Concerned American]

Never heard of Wikipedia? Or Fox?

Apparently they had even less than no evidence or they would be cashing in too, don't you think?

 

[alang1216]

Apparently they had even less than no evidence or they would be cashing in too, don't you think?

You should read the Fox article, it explains how hard it is to win such a case and why so many women are afraid to come forward. Despite all that, Carroll won her case.

 

[Concerned American]

You should read the Fox article, it explains how hard it is to win such a case and why so many women are afraid to come forward. Despite all that, Carroll won her case.

Yeah, run with that one.

 

[Calypso Jones]

bill barr will jump off a bridge if trump wins? Win/win situation.

OrangeMan2024