Big Win For Lake

Leo123 said:

Kari Lake gets big win from Arizona Supreme Court!​

therightscoop.com

Kari Lake gets big win from Arizona Supreme Court! – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com therightscoop.com

She will now be able to conduct signature verification on ballots. Thousands of ballots were approved in violation of legal requirements. Kari is a real fighter!
Click to expand...
Too funny...you are actually spinning a near-total loss into a 'big win' because one count was sent back to the lower court for review??

Damn, you fools are really, really, desperate!
 
Leo123 said:
What total loss?
Click to expand...
I do believe that I said 'Near-total', yes?

www.mcall.com

Arizona court declines most of Lake’s appeal over gov’s race

The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to hear most of Republican Kari Lake’s appeal in a challenge of her defeat in the governor’s race, but revived a claim that was dismissed by a trial court. The state’s highest court…
www.mcall.com www.mcall.com


The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to hear most of Republican Kari Lake’s appeal in a challenge of her defeat in the governor’s race but revived a claim that was dismissed by a trial court.
In an order Wednesday, the state’s highest court said a lower court erroneously dismissed Lake’s claim challenging the application of signature verification procedures on early ballots in Maricopa County. The court sent the claim back to a trial court to consider
Lake said late Wednesday that she’s thrilled with the ruling.
“The signature verification process in Maricopa County is a house of cards,” Lake said in a statement. “Thanks to this ruling my team will get the chance to topple it.” The state Supreme court declined to review six of the seven legal issues presented by the former TV news anchor’s lawyers, including a claim that centered on Lake’s allegation that over 35,000 unaccounted-for ballots were added at a processing facility run by a company. The lower court will now examine whether Lake’s signature verification claim was properly dismissed or whether she can prove her claim and show that enough votes were affected that it altered the outcome of the election.
Barrett Marson, a Republican political consultant in Phoenix aligned with the party’s establishment wing, said some human-caused errors might be uncovered in the signature verification process, but he doubted that would be enough to undo the outcome of the race. “Systematic? No,” Marson said. “Widespread? No. Election overturning? No.” Nicole DeMont, who served as Hobbs’ campaign manager, declined to comment on the decision.
 
Last edited:
EvilEyeFleegle said:
Barrett Marson, a Republican political consultant in Phoenix aligned with the party’s establishment wing, said some human-caused errors might be uncovered in the signature verification process, but he doubted that would be enough to undo the outcome of the race. “Systematic? No,” Marson said. “Widespread? No. Election overturning? No.” Nicole DeMont, who served as Hobbs’ campaign manager, declined to comment on the decision.
Click to expand...
What do you expect a Juan McWeasel machine hack to say?
 
EvilEyeFleegle said:
www.mcall.com

Arizona court declines most of Lake’s appeal over gov’s race

The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to hear most of Republican Kari Lake’s appeal in a challenge of her defeat in the governor’s race, but revived a claim that was dismissed by a trial court. The state’s highest court…
www.mcall.com www.mcall.com


The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to hear most of Republican Kari Lake’s appeal in a challenge of her defeat in the governor’s race but revived a claim that was dismissed by a trial court.
In an order Wednesday, the state’s highest court said a lower court erroneously dismissed Lake’s claim challenging the application of signature verification procedures on early ballots in Maricopa County. The court sent the claim back to a trial court to consider
Lake said late Wednesday that she’s thrilled with the ruling.
“The signature verification process in Maricopa County is a house of cards,” Lake said in a statement. “Thanks to this ruling my team will get the chance to topple it.” The state Supreme court declined to review six of the seven legal issues presented by the former TV news anchor’s lawyers, including a claim that centered on Lake’s allegation that over 35,000 unaccounted-for ballots were added at a processing facility run by a company. The lower court will now examine whether Lake’s signature verification claim was properly dismissed or whether she can prove her claim and show that enough votes were affected that it altered the outcome of the election.
Barrett Marson, a Republican political consultant in Phoenix aligned with the party’s establishment wing, said some human-caused errors might be uncovered in the signature verification process, but he doubted that would be enough to undo the outcome of the race. “Systematic? No,” Marson said. “Widespread? No. Election overturning? No.” Nicole DeMont, who served as Hobbs’ campaign manager, declined to comment on the decision.
Click to expand...
That's not a near total loss. She has a chance to prove her allegation. Why are you against that? The Republican 'establishment wing' is not to be trusted.
 
Leo123 said:
That's not a near total loss. She has a chance to prove her allegation. Why are you against that? The Republican 'establishment wing' is not to be trusted.
Click to expand...
Actually, the lower court is to review its earlier ruling in light of instruction from the higher court. that's all that's happening, right now. Maybe she gets to compare some siggies..at her own expense....the chances that she can find enough bad siggies to overturn the election are basically nil....but hey...keep hoping, right?
Of course, no guarantee the lower court will rule her way. Yeah, I call losing 6 out of 7 allegations near-total.
 
EvilEyeFleegle said:
Actually, the lower court is to review its earlier ruling in light of instruction from the higher court. that's all that's happening, right now. Maybe she gets to compare some siggies..at her own expense....the chances that she can find enough bad siggies to overturn the election are basically nil....but hey...keep hoping, right?
Of course, no guarantee the lower court will rule her way. Yeah, I call losing 6 out of 7 allegations near-total.
Click to expand...
I call it winning against a stacked deck.
 
15th post
Leo123 said:
What total loss?
Click to expand...
the shill from langley is just butthurt doing this now.:auiqs.jpg:

crying_baby.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thoughts on the 2020 election

< Previous Thread

Provisional Ballot Analysis May Reverse Outcome Of Attorney General Race

Next Thread >

Similar threads

EvilEyeFleegle
Judge rules Kari Lake unlawfully ran US media agency, voiding layoffs
Replies
9
Views
216
1srelluc
1srelluc
1srelluc
Virginia says ‘yes’ to controversial redistricting proposal, but VA Supreme Court still has to weigh in
2
Replies
22
Views
535
the watcher
the watcher
excalibur
In Calif, mail-in ballots are sent out by the thousands to illegal aliens each election
4 5 6
Replies
102
Views
2K
EdwinAMartin
E
1srelluc
Supreme Court hands GOP a redistricting win by striking down lower court block on Texas map
Replies
0
Views
148
1srelluc
1srelluc
0
California Supreme Court Orders Sheriff to Halt Election Investigation.
2
Replies
26
Views
440
candycorn
candycorn

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom