Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,371
- 16,802
- 2,190
If you don’t know or care then why did you chime into this discussion?Alrighty then, so how about you answer the question. A study showed that MSM was 93% negative on Trump. What percentage is Fox at? Simple questionHow negative is Fox on Trump?Santorum is a regular on all three prime time shows along with a handful of other Trump reps that are there to present that side of the argument. You don’t know what you’re talking about by saying the Right isn’t represented. You just don’t like the hyper critical focus on Trump. I get it. Felt the same way about Fox and Obama. We have a problem with media balance in this country
I never see a conservative on Jake Tapper, Wolf Blitzer, or Anderson Cooper, Cuomo occasionally has Santorum, but not every show. (But I watch FXN way more than CNN)
So I disagree that CNN has a fair and balanced debate. Their morning shows are just like MSNBC with no conservative voices.
I change channels a lot, especially when there are no conservatives debating, I can't stand propaganda dumps.
That said, I can offer that Harvard study that said that the MSM is 93% negative on Trump, with FXN being the most fair. FXN just added Donna Brazille to present the dems' perspective. Hannity generally doesn't have a dem sparring partner, but Tucker and Laura Ingraham generally do. Laura has to break up heated arguments regularly.
Nothing to be negative about he’s breaking records. Translation HE’s WORKING DO HIS JOB.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No idea nor care I don’t watch either one. I don’t pay attention to “studies” or “polls”. Remember election night? MSM had Hillary at 98% chance of winning. How did that work out for you guys you dumbass? WE MADE HISTORY [emoji631]
And that’s why Trump’s YOUR President [emoji631]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk