Biden Regime now applies maximum brutality to the Ukrainian People

Baron

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2008
14,229
6,709
370
Brooklyn, NYC
It's no problem for Zelensky to kill the entirely Ukrainian people
His family lived in Israel and UK, his stolen from western taxpayers $$$$ billions are stored in western banks, his highly secure bunker at polish border is guarded by the UK commandos


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Eric Zuesse

The lowest of the low in warfare is to send to the battlefront poorly trained troops and to have trailing behind them troops whose function is to shoot to kill any of those frontline poorly trained troops who try to retreat. That is what the United States command (the “NATO command” as Russia calls it — though Ukraine isn’t a member of NATO, and all of the top-command decisions for Ukraine’s forces in this war are now being made by the U.S. Government and by no one else) of Ukraine’s war with Russia on the battlefields of Ukraine has ordered, and what Ukraine’s forces now are doing especially in the region of Kherson in Ukraine’s south.

There will be hell to pay for this by Ukraine’s President Volodmyr Zelensky when this war is over. He has become so desperate to stay in charge so that he allows this to happen to his people instead of his surrendering in order to save them from the double destitution of having warfare being imposed upon them now not only by the enemy’s forces — which is what happens in ANY war — but ALSO by ‘their own’ forces (who are actually being led by a foreign power — the U.S. Government). Before the U.S. coup in Ukraine in February 2014, the vast majority of Ukrainians considered NATO to be Ukraine’s enemy, but that switched to “friend” immediately afterward. What will be their opinion of NATO after this war is over and Ukraine’s total crackdown on its press is no longer in force? (The U.S. also has a press crackdown, but it is far milder. For example, a Google search for the pair “Ministry of Defense” and “Russia” brings up the “Ministry of Defense of Ukraine” but NOT of Russia. And though the Ministry of Defense of Russia is, in fact, live online, all that one sees of it in the United States is “403 Forbidden”, with no explanation as to whom is “forbidding” it, but that “whom” is the U.S. regime itself, acting through its various agencies, including Google — as is indicated in this and this.)

Joe Biden sits safe in his White House commandeering Ukraine to his own designs, while destroying it for the residents there. Zelensky, for his part, is trapped, because if he were to lose the assistance that he is getting from America, he would be overthrown and torn apart by Ukrainians. For him to say no to Uncle Sam now would mean his own demise and his ending up in the history-books as having been not only a failed leader but also an evil one (which he is in any case, for his ruling on behalf of the United States, but the victor in any war always gets to write those books, and, so, ONLY by Uncle Sam’s winning its Ukrainian war against Russia will Zelensky have any remaining hope of surviving, either physically or reputationally).

Vladimir Putin had offered Biden a deal on December 17th, to stop America’s further expansion of NATO, in return for which there would be peace between Russia and The West (the U.S. Government and its vassal-nations or ‘allies’), but on January 7th, Biden (through his NATO) said no to that; and the only question remaining then was: When will Russia strike to neutralize Ukraine in order to prevent U.S. missiles from being posted in Ukraine about 300 miles away from Moscow (a five-minute missile-flight-time away from The Kremlin)? On February 24th, we got Russia’s answer: his “special military operation.”

And, now, things have come to this. At some point, either Biden or Putin will have to yield to the other. If Biden wins, then U.S. missiles becoming posted just five minutes away from The Kremlin (which is far too close for Russia to be able to launch its retaliatory missiles before Russia’s central command has been eliminated by a blitz American nuclear first-strike) will be only a matter of “when?” instead any longer of “if?” However, if Putin wins, then America’s empire won’t be able to reach the all-encompassing global hegemony that has been its aim ever since 25 July 1945; and this Century, the 21st, will see the replacement of the international U.S.-and-allied dictatorship (America’s growing empire ever since 1945) by international leadership from Asia, and especially from Russia and China. Both Russia and China have already made clear their condemnations of all empires, the very principle of empire, which is supremacism; and, so, they already are on record committed not to replacing existing empires, but instead as FDR was before Truman replaced him: to ending all empires and strengthening the U.N., so as to terminate imperialism itself.

 
It's no problem for Zelensky to kill the entirely Ukrainian people
His family lived in Israel and UK, his stolen from western taxpayers $$$$ billions are stored in western banks, his highly secure bunker at polish border is guarded by the UK commandos


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Eric Zuesse

The lowest of the low in warfare is to send to the battlefront poorly trained troops and to have trailing behind them troops whose function is to shoot to kill any of those frontline poorly trained troops who try to retreat. That is what the United States command (the “NATO command” as Russia calls it — though Ukraine isn’t a member of NATO, and all of the top-command decisions for Ukraine’s forces in this war are now being made by the U.S. Government and by no one else) of Ukraine’s war with Russia on the battlefields of Ukraine has ordered, and what Ukraine’s forces now are doing especially in the region of Kherson in Ukraine’s south.

There will be hell to pay for this by Ukraine’s President Volodmyr Zelensky when this war is over. He has become so desperate to stay in charge so that he allows this to happen to his people instead of his surrendering in order to save them from the double destitution of having warfare being imposed upon them now not only by the enemy’s forces — which is what happens in ANY war — but ALSO by ‘their own’ forces (who are actually being led by a foreign power — the U.S. Government). Before the U.S. coup in Ukraine in February 2014, the vast majority of Ukrainians considered NATO to be Ukraine’s enemy, but that switched to “friend” immediately afterward. What will be their opinion of NATO after this war is over and Ukraine’s total crackdown on its press is no longer in force? (The U.S. also has a press crackdown, but it is far milder. For example, a Google search for the pair “Ministry of Defense” and “Russia” brings up the “Ministry of Defense of Ukraine” but NOT of Russia. And though the Ministry of Defense of Russia is, in fact, live online, all that one sees of it in the United States is “403 Forbidden”, with no explanation as to whom is “forbidding” it, but that “whom” is the U.S. regime itself, acting through its various agencies, including Google — as is indicated in this and this.)

Joe Biden sits safe in his White House commandeering Ukraine to his own designs, while destroying it for the residents there. Zelensky, for his part, is trapped, because if he were to lose the assistance that he is getting from America, he would be overthrown and torn apart by Ukrainians. For him to say no to Uncle Sam now would mean his own demise and his ending up in the history-books as having been not only a failed leader but also an evil one (which he is in any case, for his ruling on behalf of the United States, but the victor in any war always gets to write those books, and, so, ONLY by Uncle Sam’s winning its Ukrainian war against Russia will Zelensky have any remaining hope of surviving, either physically or reputationally).

Vladimir Putin had offered Biden a deal on December 17th, to stop America’s further expansion of NATO, in return for which there would be peace between Russia and The West (the U.S. Government and its vassal-nations or ‘allies’), but on January 7th, Biden (through his NATO) said no to that; and the only question remaining then was: When will Russia strike to neutralize Ukraine in order to prevent U.S. missiles from being posted in Ukraine about 300 miles away from Moscow (a five-minute missile-flight-time away from The Kremlin)? On February 24th, we got Russia’s answer: his “special military operation.”

And, now, things have come to this. At some point, either Biden or Putin will have to yield to the other. If Biden wins, then U.S. missiles becoming posted just five minutes away from The Kremlin (which is far too close for Russia to be able to launch its retaliatory missiles before Russia’s central command has been eliminated by a blitz American nuclear first-strike) will be only a matter of “when?” instead any longer of “if?” However, if Putin wins, then America’s empire won’t be able to reach the all-encompassing global hegemony that has been its aim ever since 25 July 1945; and this Century, the 21st, will see the replacement of the international U.S.-and-allied dictatorship (America’s growing empire ever since 1945) by international leadership from Asia, and especially from Russia and China. Both Russia and China have already made clear their condemnations of all empires, the very principle of empire, which is supremacism; and, so, they already are on record committed not to replacing existing empires, but instead as FDR was before Truman replaced him: to ending all empires and strengthening the U.N., so as to terminate imperialism itself.

You are an idiot. You constantly try to blame the west and the freely elected government of Ukraine for Russias actions.
 
It's almost unfathomable that a peace deal has not been brokered by now. All that needs to happen is for the US to get the ball rolling.

The Tater administration is a failure from top to bottom at everything.
All that has to happen for peace is for Russia to return to its 1999 borders and stop invading other nations. Negotiations and appeasement were tried and failed.
 
It's almost unfathomable that a peace deal has not been brokered by now. All that needs to happen is for the US to get the ball rolling.

The Tater administration is a failure from top to bottom at everything.

For a peace deal, there must be some willingness to compromise. And let’s be honest. Neither side is willing. And in the case of Ukraine. I agree.

Let’s say a neighbor is moving the fence marking the property line along your back yard. He is moving it closer to your house. Claiming the land as his. How willing to compromise would you be? You would demand your yard back. And he would demand an end to the fighting if you let him have what he had already stolen.

I’m betting your position would be get the fuck out of my yard and I’ll quit fighting. Isn’t that what Ukraine has essentially said?
 
3F77F5A7-F3B9-43B9-A30D-88D0F0739659.jpeg
 
Wouldn't NATO to its 1997 status be a better idea?
Nope, NATO is a voluntary DEFENSIVE alliance. Russia has forced every nation into NATO that has joined since the fall of the Iron Curtain. Forcing the Warsaw Pact and CIS nations that have VOLUNTATILY joined NATO out of it would just leave them ripe to be conquered by Russia which has worked very hard to establish a modern track record for invading and annexing its peaceful neighbors. It would be like Germany forcing the US to expel the USSR and UK from the allies in WWII so Germany could conquer them.
 
Nope, NATO is a voluntary DEFENSIVE alliance. Russia has forced every nation into NATO that has joined since the fall of the Iron Curtain. Forcing the Warsaw Pact and CIS nations that have VOLUNTATILY joined NATO out of it would just leave them ripe to be conquered by Russia which has worked very hard to establish a modern track record for invading and annexing its peaceful neighbors. It would be like Germany forcing the US to expel the USSR and UK from the allies in WWII so Germany could conquer them.
No matter what bats in your crazy belfry tell you that's the goal of this whole Ukrainian shit, 1997 NATO status.
 
No matter what bats in your crazy belfry tell you that's the goal of this whole Ukrainian shit, 1997 NATO status.
That ship has sailed. Before the invasion and for a short after, Zelensky offered to withdraw Ukraine's application to join NATO, but Putin ignored him and now it is clear that Ukraine can never be safe from Russia again unless it joins NATO. Russia clearly cannot win this war and everyday Russa grows weaker and poorer because of this war. Eventually if will become clear to Russia that the only way to save itself is to completely withdraw from Ukraine and to drop its opposition to Ukraine joining NATO and the EU.
 
For a peace deal, there must be some willingness to compromise. And let’s be honest. Neither side is willing. And in the case of Ukraine. I agree.

Let’s say a neighbor is moving the fence marking the property line along your back yard. He is moving it closer to your house. Claiming the land as his. How willing to compromise would you be? You would demand your yard back. And he would demand an end to the fighting if you let him have what he had already stolen.

I’m betting your position would be get the fuck out of my yard and I’ll quit fighting. Isn’t that what Ukraine has essentially said?
Pretty simplistic but lets go with it.....

Your non-HOA neighbor has agreed not to join the HOA next to him he's been talking about for years and in turn you agree that you won't build on a disputed property line but you keep hearing of the neighbor requesting to join the HOA with the aim of bringing the legal might of the HOA to bear against you to take the disputed property so you say FU, take the land, and build on it.

That would be the way I would roll. ;)
 
Pretty simplistic but lets go with it.....

Your non-HOA neighbor has agreed not to join the HOA next to him he's been talking about for years and in turn you agree that you won't build on a disputed property line but you keep hearing of the neighbor requesting to join the HOA with the aim of bringing the legal might of the HOA to bear against you to take the disputed property so you say FU, take the land, and build on it.

That would be the way I would roll. ;)
There is no disputed property. Crimea and the Donbass are recognized by the whole world, including Russia before Putin, as part of the sovereign state of Ukraine.
 
Pretty simplistic but lets go with it.....

Your non-HOA neighbor has agreed not to join the HOA next to him he's been talking about for years and in turn you agree that you won't build on a disputed property line but you keep hearing of the neighbor requesting to join the HOA with the aim of bringing the legal might of the HOA to bear against you to take the disputed property so you say FU, take the land, and build on it.

That would be the way I would roll. ;)

Not exactly right. To keep it right. The HOA would state definitely that they would not allow the neighbor to join. The HOA rules would require every single member to approve your neighbor joining. And every single one of them said no. So all of them suddenly changing their minds seems unlikely.

The problem with your assertion is that in the scenario. There was supposedly a chance of Ukraine joining NATO. NATO kept saying no. Ukraine said no. But the danger was Ukraine tying themselves to European Union economy. It wasn’t the military alliance that frightened the Russians. But the economic and social ties.

As for Russia taking land that doesn’t belong to them. It isn’t the first time.



But back to the economic and social ties. Remember why the wall went up in Berlin during the Cold War. It wasn’t because people in the west wanted in. It was that people wanted greater opportunity and standards of living in the west.

If Ukraine finished their economic and social ties to Europe instead of Russia they would be a beacon of higher standards of living for the more restrictive Russian zone.

True story. During the Soviet era the Embassy in Washington recorded a Television report on poverty in America. This video was shown in the Soviet Union. It backfired badly. The “poor” in America had luxury items unavailable to pretty much everyone in Russia. Cars, microwaves, multiple TV’s.

Now modern Russia is better off than their Soviet era people. But imagine it if Ukraine was a beacon of freedom and economic opportunity right on the border.

If Ukraine was in the EU then they would have free trade with Europe and free travel. Opportunity would abound.
 
It is widely reported the Russian army shot retreating troops. Do not know about the Ukraine.
 
Vladimir Putin had offered Biden a deal on December 17th, to stop America’s further expansion of NATO, in return for which there would be peace between Russia and The West (the U.S. Government and its vassal-nations or ‘allies’), but on January 7th, Biden (through his NATO) said no to that; and the only question remaining then was: When will Russia strike to neutralize Ukraine in order to prevent U.S. missiles from being posted in Ukraine about 300 miles away from Moscow (a five-minute missile-flight-time away from The Kremlin)? On February 24th, we got Russia’s answer: his “special military operation.”
We should also remember many events most of us were unaware of before February 24th:

When Peace Had a Chance in Ukraine - Truthdig

"The Minsk II agreement, signed in February 2015, brought the worst fighting of the civil war in eastern Ukraine to an end.

"While the Ukrainian military cooperated in the cease-fire and the withdrawal of heavy weapons from the buffer zone, efforts by the Ukrainian government to move forward with the political aspects of the agreement, including arranging internationally monitored elections in the breakaway Donbas republics (DPR and LPR) and creating new laws granting them autonomy, quickly ran into domestic and international headwinds.

"The official position of the United States was always that it supported the Minsk II agreement.

"Its public statements blamed Russia for its failed implementation and highlighted cease-fire violations rather than the more critical problems with the political aspects of the agreement.

"But the United States also consistently acted as a 'spoiler,' a role that conflict resolution experts often observe outside powers playing in the failure of such peace agreements, by quietly incentivizing and supporting its proxy, in this case the Ukrainian government, to pursue military alternatives to the agreed-upon political resolution."
 
Did Lizz Truss send a message to Anthony Blinken immediately after the Nord Stream terror attacks saying "it's done"?

Truss texted US secretary of state after Nord Stream attack saying 'it's done': Russia

"Western leaders have stopped short of publicly blaming Russia for the attack – which blew two holes in each pipeline and may have permanently disabled them – but have been privately briefing their suspicions that Putin was behind it.

"Kim’s claim about Truss’s iPhone also picked up and parroted by Maria Zakharova, spokesman for Russia’s foreign ministry, who demanded answers, Daily Mail reported.

"'Frankly, I don’t care who got this information or how,' she said. “I am interested in London’s response to the following question: 'Did British Prime Minister Liz Truss send a message to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in the immediate aftermath of the bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline saying ‘It’s done?'"
 

Forum List

Back
Top