- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,784
- 52,113
- 3,600
Who did it then?Democrats didnāt do it. But youāll keep lying about it, anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who did it then?Democrats didnāt do it. But youāll keep lying about it, anyway.
there never was. Itās not a thing. It doesnāt exist. There is nothing in the law that ever said the election could be āsent back to the stateā.There is not now. They changed the law.
You don't want the VP to put a stop to voter fraud?No, he couldnāt. There is no legal basis. You canāt just make the rules up.
I donāt want the VP to throw the election to his own party because he thinks they have the political power to override the voters.You don't want the VP to put a stop to voter fraud?
The procedure is in the Constitution.there never was. Itās not a thing. It doesnāt exist. There is nothing in the law that ever said the election could be āsent back to the stateā.
There was plenty of opportunity to deal with the election result. I have no idea why you guys think that they needed more time.
Only the state legislatures of those states have the power to do that. Plenary power.I donāt want the VP to throw the election to his own party because he thinks they have the political power to override the voters.
Thatās some banana republic shit.
There is nothing in the constitution that talks about āsending it back to the statesā.The procedure is in the Constitution.
If those state legislatures wanted to do that (they didnāt) they had their chance.Only the state legislatures of those states have the power to do that. Plenary power.
There is nothing in the constitution that talks about āsending it back to the statesā.
It doesnāt exist.
Whatās your point? quote the section you find relevant.The Constitution and contested presidential elections | Constitution Center
The Electoral College is a uniquely American institution and no stranger to controversy. But legally contested presidential elections within its system are not the norm for a part of the Constitution that dates back to 1787.constitutioncenter.org
It is not that long. Give reading a try.Whatās your point? quote the section you find relevant.
I did. Which is why I donāt understand what you think this says that supports anything about āsending it back to the stateā.It is not that long. Give reading a try.
MTG is one of the most ignorant and stupid people ever elected to Congress.More Republicans in DC need to get behind MTG on this. Americans should not tolerate treasonous behavior. Traitors to America should face the justice system.
---"Joe Biden is guilty of treason and the Democrat Party has opened a door they should have NEVER opened," she said. "They should be forced to live by their own rules."---
First of all it was by definition an insurrection, a violent uprising against the government. The danger is from the lies that our president spewed to fuel the insurrection, claiming the election was stolen, that the VP could not certify the votes. He is stillI have yet to meet a leftist able to explain the logic behind how a 3 hour riot by the Right (Damage under 10 million, and no one died at the hands of the rioters) is a grave danger to our country, but turning dozens of cities into actual war zones is not.
You are truly clueless.First of all it was by definition an insurrection, a violent uprising against the government. The danger is from the lies that our president spewed to fuel the insurrection, claiming the election was stolen, that the VP could not certify the votes. He is still
Pushing those lies and undermining practically all our institutions. Itās a step towards anarchy
Imare empty insults all you have or did you want to try again to make a substantive argument? Iām happy to educate you againYou are truly clueless.
The propaganda you post has no substance.Imare empty insults all you have or did you want to try again to make a substantive argument? Iām happy to educate you again
Of course it does. You just donāt possess the chops to make a substantive counter argument. All you have are empty insultsThe propaganda you post has no substance.
Your delusional.First of all it was by definition an insurrection, a violent uprising against the government. The danger is from the lies that our president spewed to fuel the insurrection, claiming the election was stolen, that the VP could not certify the votes. He is still
Pushing those lies and undermining practically all our institutions. Itās a step towards anarchy
See this is what I get from you dimwits. I lay out a series of counter points to your dishonest narratives and instead of responding with a substantive intelligent argument you give up and insult. Sorry but thatās a white flag. Youāre out of your leagueYour delusional.
I stand by my statement that led to this response.