Biden Hits New Low

[Faun]

That was addressed previously in the thread . Read it before posting. instead of me doing double or triple work, looking it up, to repost it.

And you saw it. You forgot the 81%. ?

No, it wasn't. You went on to ramble about how 98% is 81% which puts Trump at 62%. All numbers you simply made up. And of course, you also said you couldn't find what you claimed you "just heard."

 

[Faun]

They predicted a Hitlery ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE, Fuckwit.

The pollsters did, dumbfuck, not the polls. Only one state poll, Wisconsin, was outside of the margin of error.

You never learn.

 

[Nostra]

The pollsters did, dumbfuck, not the polls. Only one state poll, Wisconsin, was outside of the margin of error.

You never learn.

Polls don’t predict anything, Assflap. They are inanimate numbers.

polling people predicted an ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE based on polls, Dumbass.

 

[Faun]

Then quote it, retard.

I think you have dementia.

Bigly.

 

[Faun]

Polls don’t predict anything, Assflap. They are inanimate numbers.

Of course they do. They reflect how people are going to vote. They are just a snapshot in time, which is why the only polls that matter (other than the election itself) are the ones taken the day of or the day before the election. And again, 49 of 50 states were within the margin of error. That's very accurate. And again, you never learn.

polling people predicted an ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE based on polls, Dumbass.

LOL

Dumbfuck, that's what I just said.

 

[Canon Shooter]

48% of those who call themselves "independents" think he's doing okay.

I've been a registered Independent for 41 years.

Joe Biden is not doing okay. He's in a cognitive downward spiral that, sadly, has passed its point of rescue. Left to his own devices he mumbles and babbles and completely loses track of discussions. His supporters would ask that you blame that on his stuttering problem at a younger age, but stuttering doesn't make you space out as Biden does.

A while back I offered up a bet to libs: $1,000 that says Joe Biden isn't President this time next year, and no one wanted to take it. I offered the same bet to my liberal friends I see every day. Not a single person took that bet. Why not? It's obvious: Even THEY know that Biden is on his last legs.

I actually feel sorry for Biden. As an elder statesman, he should be allowed to retire and ride off into the sunset years of his life. Libs have robbed him of that...

 

[Nostra]

Of course they do. They reflect how people are going to vote. They are just a snapshot in time, which is why the only polls that matter (other than the election itself) are the ones taken the day of or the day before the election. And again, 49 of 50 states were within the margin of error. That's very accurate. And again, you never learn.


LOL

Dumbfuck, that's what I just said.

Glad you agree there were predictions of a Hitlery ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE.

Always happy to educate the ignorant.

 

[Faun]

Glad you agree there were predictions of a Hitlery ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE.

Always happy to educate the ignorant.

LOL

Yes, dumbfuck, by pollsters, not polls. That's what I said and that's what you keep agreeing with.

 

[protectionist]

Already been pointed out but …

View attachment 518279

Why Biden’s Approval Rating Has Barely Budged In His First 6 Months

The first six months in the White House are often frenzied for presidents as they push for big policy changes to try to live up to their campaign promises. Pres…

fivethirtyeight.com

Five Thirty Eight is a Democrat mouthpiece.

FiveThirtyEight Demonstrates Conclusively the Bias of Statistics and the Real Danger of Polling

FiveThirtyEight.com is a website born from a blog on Daily Kos, who, for anyone living in a political cave over the past few years, is a very left-wing site. Nate Silver started a blog where he appli...

redstate.com

 

[protectionist]

You said Republicans don't participate in polls. Now you're saying they do. Which is it?

And you still haven't answered where you got that number from. Hmm, I wonder why that is. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm such a mystery why you're avoiding that one.

Moron. 2 out of 1000 is just a metaphor I came up with, to describe NON-PARTICIPATION. You aren't looking very bright here, I mean really.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Moron. 2 out of 1000 is just a metaphor I came up with, to describe NON-PARTICIPATION. You aren't looking very bright here, I mean really.

Oh so you're just MAKING SHIT UP AGAIN. Got it!

 

[protectionist]

I showed proof. That's all I can do. I can't make a senile curmudgeon understand it.

LOLOL

Dayum, you're fucking insane.

It shows 823 Republicans and Republican-leaners responded to the poll.

Here's another...

View attachment 518351​

"Another" WHAT ? Useless and worthless Democrat poll ? HA HA HA. back to the drawing board for you.

 

[Faun]

"Another" WHAT ? Useless and worthless Democrat poll ? HA HA HA. back to the drawing board for you.

LOLOL

Sadly, nuh-uh! really is all you have.

 

[protectionist]

I showed proof. That's all I can do. I can't make a senile curmudgeon understand it.

You showed sqaut nothing. A Democrat poll. Oh, whoopee. LOL.

You're not talking to another airhead Democrat here.

 

[protectionist]

Oh so you're just MAKING SHIT UP AGAIN. Got it!

You're trying very hard to invalidate my words. And the harder you try, the harder you fall. HAHA. I don't think you realize how silly you look.

 

[Faun]

You showed sqaut nothing. A Democrat poll. Oh, whoopee. LOL.

You're not talking to another airhead Democrat here.

Yes, and those Democratic polls accurately predicted the 2016 election. Not too shabby, huh?

 

[Faun]

You're trying very hard to invalidate my words. And the harder you try, the harder you fall. HAHA. I don't think you realize how silly you look.

Still waiting for you to show where you got that 98% approval rating from....

 

[ChemEngineer]

I condemn anyone (ANYONE) who commits violence, looting, arson, or destruction.

No you do not. You encourage it. You're a Leftist and promote divisiveness by race and social class.

 

[protectionist]

Yet you did exactly that when you claimed lack of names of respondents as evidence they didn't participate in the poll.

Idiot. I didn't claim that "lack of names of respondents as evidence they didn't participate in the poll." I just said you were not producing evidence, and you didn't , and you still haven't.

 

[protectionist]

Still waiting for you to show where you got that 98% approval rating from....

Still waiting for you to concede that I measured that with a statement about 81 %, which would produce a 62% approval rate. 62 or 70. both a lot more than Biden's pathetic 25%.