TimFitz
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2024
- 9,380
- 5,360
- 938
As soon as I read LaTricea I knew it was all downhill after that.
Don’t hide your bigotry!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As soon as I read LaTricea I knew it was all downhill after that.
Post 156 addressed the commandeer notion. Ho hum. yawn****They aren't doing that. ICE is perfectly able to do their jobs, just they don't get to comandeer others to do so.
Let's just say there a very few dems the .gov that is above board.....They made their reps, not me.Don’t hide your bigotry!
And you've yet to point out any affirmative action that anyone has taken to conceal or shield illegal immigrants.You keep changing the subject and pretending that your point is the point of the discussion, It isn't.
Federal immigration law trumps (pardon the pun) state sanctuary law and policy, and the important difference between a state’s or city’s (a) decision not to help the feds (which it is allowed to do) and (b) positive obstruction or interference with the feds (which it is forbidden from doing).
Homan made clear that the feds would not attempt to commandeer state and city officials. He acknowledged that such officials have no duty to help federal immigration agents. But they may not interfere with the agents in the execution of their duties or take affirmative steps to conceal or shield illegal immigrants from federal law enforcement.
Which is exactly what sanctuary cities are doing.
![]()
ANDREW McCARTHY: Trump's incoming border czar issues a warning sanctuary cities ignore at their own peril
We know from experience (in the last Trump administration) that open-borders advocate organizations will forum-shop cases to activist progressive judges who will rule in their favor.www.foxnews.com
There isn’t any reason to believe this. Anymore than it here was ever any reason to believe the ridiculous claims made by DOGE.
This is the type of blatant, in your face corruption communist and Democrat dictatorships are known for.
Thank you, DOGE, for uncovering the MASSIVE money-laundering and corruption we endured for the past 4 years (and beyond).
Nobody is saying they are or need to.They aren't doing that. ICE is perfectly able to do their jobs, just they don't get to comandeer others to do so.
and this is just the very tiny tip of a gigantic iceberg .. in the coming months the American people will absolutely shocked at the enormity of waste and fraud committed by the left .. the light being shined on the dem party may lead to its ultimate destruction ..
DOGE keeps making claims about fraud and when called out on it, they back up to waste.and this is just the very tiny tip of a gigantic iceberg .. in the coming months the American people will absolutely shocked at the enormity of waste and fraud committed by the left .. the light being shined on the dem party may lead to its ultimate destruction ..
Agreed, the facts are not in dispute. The $494,000,000 fine is the issue. The normal fine is much less.They might! I don't deny that. However, the facts of the case are not really in dispute. The question is whether Trump is allowed to get away with fraud or not. It has nothing to do with prosecutorial misconduct.
Letitia ran on "getting Trump" who was running for president. The prosecution and the fine are prosecutorial misconduct as well as election interference. Lawfare needs to be prosecuted.That's absurd. You'd be implying that anyone who fails to achieve a conviction is guilty of prosecutorial misconduct, but that's not what it means. There's been no allegations that prosecutors did anything illegal.
The facts show he committed fraud. I don't care if the fine is reduced, he's still a fraudster.Agreed, the facts are not in dispute. The $494,000,000 fine is the issue. The normal fine is much less.
This is total nonsense. First, the fine can't be considered prosecutorial misconduct since it is set by the JUDGE. Calling it election interference is likewise nonsense. I honestly don't even know what law could possibly apply and I doubt you do either.Letitia ran on "getting Trump" who was running for president. The prosecution and the fine are prosecutorial misconduct as well as election interference. Lawfare needs to be prosecuted.
Ignoring a detainer and releasing criminals back onto the streets.And you've yet to point out any affirmative action that anyone has taken to conceal or shield illegal immigrants.
10% for The Big Guy.
Detainers are not legally binding. They're voluntary requests.Ignoring a detainer and releasing criminals back onto the streets.
OK, but you asked what affirmative acts that anyone has taken to conceal or shield illegal immigrants.Detainers are not legally binding. They're voluntary requests.
Ignoring a retainer is not an affirmative act.OK, but you asked what affirmative acts that anyone has taken to conceal or shield illegal immigrants.
There's no reason for YOU to believe it, because your religion won't allow you to.
20 million to a Spanish teacher, xiden supporter for environmental science is both fraud, waste and abuseDOGE keeps making claims about fraud and when called out on it, they back up to waste.
As for what constitutes waste, it appears that's just anything they don't like. It's a meaningless term.