Biden EPA gave a $20 million grant to his own "environmental justice" adviser WHILE SHE WAS STILL WORKING FOR HIM

How is it fraud?
Because she’s a Spanish teacher not an environmental scientist

It was a grift from xiden to his supporter

Corruption, clear conflict of interest to award his own staff with this million dollar gift
 
Because she’s a Spanish teacher not an environmental scientist

It was a grift from xiden to his supporter

Corruption, clear conflict of interest to award his own staff with this million dollar gift
She was on an advisory council. Where's the "conflict of interest"?
 
She was on an advisory council. Where's the "conflict of interest"?
She was working for the president admin and go 20 million for something she has no experience in as a Spanish teacher
 
She was working for the president admin and go 20 million for something she has no experience in as a Spanish teacher
That's still not a conflict of interest. What is the conflict?
 
And you've yet to point out any affirmative action that anyone has taken to conceal or shield illegal immigrants.
Post # 30 is one example.

Is there a doctor in the house ? I mean really. :rolleyes:
 
This is the type of blatant, in your face corruption communist and Democrat dictatorships are known for.

Thank you, DOGE, for uncovering the MASSIVE money-laundering and corruption we endured for the past 4 years (and beyond).


Even if that were true...that is NOTHING compared to all the corrupt shit Trump has done and will be doing over the next 4 years.
 
Even if that were true...that is NOTHING compared to all the corrupt shit Trump has done and will be doing over the next 4 years.
What corrupt shit ?
The stuff leftwing media keeps babbling about. All the gone nowhere indictments. Kangaroo courts, political theater. Ho hum.
 
It's worse than that, since it talks about sheriffs refusing to enforce STATE laws that they didn't like.

I'm not aware that the federal government is even asking state governments from enforcing federal gun laws, which makes this attempt to draw parallels rather difficult.

In any event, you should be careful as to how broad you want to interpret this kind of power.

And you should stop wasting political capital on people who just want to fix government bloat, but you won't because you are idiots.
 
And you should stop wasting political capital on people who just want to fix government bloat, but you won't because you are idiots.
They want to break government. They’re not trying to fix it.
 
They want to break government. They’re not trying to fix it.

Wrong. This is restoring constitutional federal government and restoring the power of the elected President over the executive branch.

The next step is to get congress to do it's job and pass specific laws for specific things, and not leave it up to said executive.
 
Wrong. This is restoring constitutional federal government and restoring the power of the elected President over the executive branch.

The next step is to get congress to do its job and pass specific laws for specific things, and not leave it up to said executive.
It’s the biggest power grab in executive history. You aren’t restoring anything.

But you like your authoritarian so it’s all good with you.
 
It’s the biggest power grab in executive history. You aren’t restoring anything.

But you like your authoritarian so it’s all good with you.

A President Constitutionally in charge of the executive making sure he is in charge of the executive is a power grab?
 
It’s the biggest power grab in executive history. You aren’t restoring anything.

But you like your authoritarian so it’s all good with you.
This "power grab" just DESTROYED your deep state 40 ******* BILLION DOLLAR SLUSH FUND.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
GFY
:dev3:
 
15th post
A President Constitutionally in charge of the executive making sure he is in charge of the executive is a power grab?
It is when presidents exercised restraint to keep politics out of parts of the government where it doesn’t belong.

But now you’re okay with politicization of government because it’s your politics.
 
My views are supported by a LAW PROFESSOR and probably the appeals courts. You support LAWFARE.

"Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan"

"Reacting to Engoron's decision to reject a stay last week, Turley said, "That has a gross unfairness to it when you combine the use of the law and the size of his judgment and then this requirement for a deposit. But he just simply brushed those aside and his tone almost bordered on the mocking."

Pam Bondi needs to prosecute Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, and the crooked judges.
Do is a favor. Try supporting your garbage WITHOUT quoting LAW PROFESSORS Jonathan Turdley.

That’s getting tiresome. Find at least one other stooge (not named Dershowitz) to quote
 
It is when presidents exercised restraint to keep politics out of parts of the government where it doesn’t belong.

But now you’re okay with politicization of government because it’s your politics.

Bullshit, Dems always play politics at all levels of government. What a ******* lie.
 
Bullshit, Dems always play politics at all levels of government. What a ******* lie.
I know you believe that, but it’s just another of your baseless opinions.

Eric Adams had charges dropped so that he could help Trump’s immigration policy. That’s politics.
 
Back
Top Bottom