Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Beto O’rourke was talked up by biden as his “gun czar”Why are you dragging-out a year-old article about something that never materialized?
Wake me up when Sleepy Old Uncle Joe makes his move....Beto O’rourke was talked up by biden as his “gun czar” do you think biden intended to use o’rourke as his point man on gun control? or was he just blowing smoke up anti gun radicals ass? whatever happens its clear that democrats are serious about taking all the guns if not now then when they can
Why?wake me up when Sleepy Old Uncle Joe makes his move.
There are people who will never accept that thing as VP be President. She may rule, but the underground will secretly grow as the evil encompasses us all. This woman has repeatedly shown us what she is. And you are blind. I am supposed to eliminate what I was taught in my younger years. It can be done but we accuse each others of being babies. I want power over those who accuse those of being babies to see what they are. Then all of us will be even. And we all want even. We all want transitional levels of peace and love. You can not so that going back a few centuries without bringing attention to those who have lived their lives in this modern era and have gotten screwed over.Wake me up when Sleepy Old Uncle Joe makes his move....Beto O’rourke was talked up by biden as his “gun czar” do you think biden intended to use o’rourke as his point man on gun control? or was he just blowing smoke up anti gun radicals ass? whatever happens its clear that democrats are serious about taking all the guns if not now then when they can
a pistol is semi auto you fking fool.A ban on military configured semi-auto rifles, not your hunting rifle, shotgun or pistol. that is the conclusion.What was the conclusion then? Are you human enough to admit it? I doubt it.Stop with the hyperbole. He said he would like to see the reinstatement of the 1994 assault rifle ban. For ten years you could not buy anything like an AR-15 and the country did not suffer for it.So some liberal extremist, Trump-Hating Whack-a-doodle with a Muslim-sounding name goes on a shooting spree, and Biden and the Democrats rush to use this as an excuse to strip LAW-ABIDING citizens of their 2nd Amendment Rights.
During the foreign-funded Democrat-supported domestic-terrorist violence of Antifa looting, pillaging, destroying, arsonist, raping, assaulting, and murdering Antifa terrorist acts in Democrat-run communities all over the country - that caused BILLIONS of dollars in damage and destroyed many Americans businesses / dreams...
Democrats arrested a couple for holding their legally-owned, Constitutionally protected personal weapons on their own property in front of their own house - in a 'Stand-Your Ground' state, to protect themselves and ther home from violent protestors who threatened their lives and threatened to burn down their House.
The trespassing terrorists were arrested for trespassing....and have already been released. The case by a liberal extremist AG against the couple is still on-going, has not been dropped, despite the fact that they did not do anything illegal and a bipartisan effort to get the charges dropped is on-going.
Biden and the Democrats, who are just screwing the majority of Americans as hard as they can as fast as they can have turned DC into the Iraqi 'Green Zone' defended by National Guard Troops because they are so deathly afraid that the Americans they are screwing and whose country they are turning into a 3rd-world socialist tyrannical country are going to rise up against them for what they are doing.
To ensure a successful revolt against their tyrannical transformation f this nation into a single-party Socialist state they HAVE to take the guns out of the hands of the people.
'Hell yes, we are coming after your AR-15s!'
- A bill has already been submitted by proven CCP Espionage Facilitator Diane Feinstein
Hell YES, we are coming for your guns. There was never any doubt.
Biden calls on Senate to pass gun control measures 'immediately' after Boulder shooting
President Biden on Tuesday implored the Senate to pass new gun control measures in the wake of a mass shooting that left 10 dead in Boulder, Colorado, this week.www.foxnews.com
Hey, time to wake up.Wake me up when Sleepy Old Uncle Joe makes his move.
Bull. Some of those idiots would want to ban all guns. Don't look for me to give up mine.like?but I have no problem with intelligent regulation.
"Intelligent regulation" means he'll support whatever Democrats propose
Most, Democrat even, do not want to take away guns, but do want tougher gun laws. Republicans just like that overstatement because their base has to have simple little answers and buzz-phrases so they don't have to think. Seen any polls supporting no guns in private hands? No. You are used to being lied to from top of party, so you accept the lie and re-broadcast it, as you are against any regulation. Your position does not favor Americans, but is great for NRA and gun manufacturers. I bet you voted for George W. Bush back in the day, just because he was at the top of the ticket. You are aware, no doubt, after Katrina he had National Guard troops in New Orleans, pulling security for state forces of Louisiana and city forces of New Orleans going house to house taking up personal weapons, whether houses occupied by owner or empty, poor or rich, without regard to party, right. This shows me, Democrats may regulate them in our crowded society, but republicans with actually take them away and gun point. As usual your side does or has done what it falsely accuses the other side of doing. Don't continue to be a stooge for your false cause. Help shape what you think is intelligent regulation.Bull. Some of those idiots would want to ban all guns. Don't look for me to give up mine.like?but I have no problem with intelligent regulation.
"Intelligent regulation" means he'll support whatever Democrats propose
And yet any "intelligent regulation" is fine with you with no definition or scope of what that means. And you vote for the people who "intelligent regulation" means no guns in private hands
This is a lie.So some liberal extremist, Trump-Hating Whack-a-doodle with a Muslim-sounding name goes on a shooting spree, and Biden and the Democrats rush to use this as an excuse to strip LAW-ABIDING citizens of their 2nd Amendment Rights.
During the foreign-funded Democrat-supported domestic-terrorist violence of Antifa looting, pillaging, destroying, arsonist, raping, assaulting, and murdering Antifa terrorist acts in Democrat-run communities all over the country - that caused BILLIONS of dollars in damage and destroyed many Americans businesses / dreams...
Democrats arrested a couple for holding their legally-owned, Constitutionally protected personal weapons on their own property in front of their own house - in a 'Stand-Your Ground' state, to protect themselves and ther home from violent protestors who threatened their lives and threatened to burn down their House.
The trespassing terrorists were arrested for trespassing....and have already been released. The case by a liberal extremist AG against the couple is still on-going, has not been dropped, despite the fact that they did not do anything illegal and a bipartisan effort to get the charges dropped is on-going.
Biden and the Democrats, who are just screwing the majority of Americans as hard as they can as fast as they can have turned DC into the Iraqi 'Green Zone' defended by National Guard Troops because they are so deathly afraid that the Americans they are screwing and whose country they are turning into a 3rd-world socialist tyrannical country are going to rise up against them for what they are doing.
To ensure a successful revolt against their tyrannical transformation f this nation into a single-party Socialist state they HAVE to take the guns out of the hands of the people.
'Hell yes, we are coming after your AR-15s!'
- A bill has already been submitted by proven CCP Espionage Facilitator Diane Feinstein
Hell YES, we are coming for your guns. There was never any doubt.
Biden calls on Senate to pass gun control measures 'immediately' after Boulder shooting
President Biden on Tuesday implored the Senate to pass new gun control measures in the wake of a mass shooting that left 10 dead in Boulder, Colorado, this week.
This is a lie. Biden did not call for a "gun ban."
Most, Democrat even, do not want to take away guns, but do want tougher gun laws. Republicans just like that overstatement because their base has to have simple little answers and buzz-phrases so they don't have to think. Seen any polls supporting no guns in private hands? No. You are used to being lied to from top of party, so you accept the lie and re-broadcast it, as you are against any regulation. Your position does not favor Americans, but is great for NRA and gun manufacturers. I bet you voted for George W. Bush back in the day, just because he was at the top of the ticket. You are aware, no doubt, after Katrina he had National Guard troops in New Orleans, pulling security for state forces of Louisiana and city forces of New Orleans going house to house taking up personal weapons, whether houses occupied by owner or empty, poor or rich, without regard to party, right. This shows me, Democrats may regulate them in our crowded society, but republicans with actually take them away and gun point. As usual your side does or has done what it falsely accuses the other side of doing. Don't continue to be a stooge for your false cause. Help shape what you think is intelligent regulation.Bull. Some of those idiots would want to ban all guns. Don't look for me to give up mine.like?but I have no problem with intelligent regulation.
"Intelligent regulation" means he'll support whatever Democrats propose
And yet any "intelligent regulation" is fine with you with no definition or scope of what that means. And you vote for the people who "intelligent regulation" means no guns in private hands
You keep posting this silliness. explain what 'tougher' means. you haven't updated the other items we've asked you to respond to. So I will assume you have no clue what you're talking about.tougher
Far left not running the party. They are just making the most noise as the did not get Bernie or Warren and did not even come close. Compared to everybody else that ran on either side, especially DJT, Joe is the sole of the moderate. Nobody is coming for your guns. That was the Republican, George W. Bush in New Orleans, after Katrina. Trump was advised to declare martial law by that traitor general he pardoned, but found out he would not have been able to pull it off, so the republicans did not get to put troops on the streets across America hold a military controlled re-vote, which probably allowed us to keep our guns until the next crises as viewed from the right wing republicans, if they are in control. There is a lot of difference between Dem knowing we need to control them better and republicans putting armed troops on the street to back up the guys taking them away, mostly to never be given back, even to home owners in the upscale neighborhoods.Most, Democrat even, do not want to take away guns, but do want tougher gun laws. Republicans just like that overstatement because their base has to have simple little answers and buzz-phrases so they don't have to think. Seen any polls supporting no guns in private hands? No. You are used to being lied to from top of party, so you accept the lie and re-broadcast it, as you are against any regulation. Your position does not favor Americans, but is great for NRA and gun manufacturers. I bet you voted for George W. Bush back in the day, just because he was at the top of the ticket. You are aware, no doubt, after Katrina he had National Guard troops in New Orleans, pulling security for state forces of Louisiana and city forces of New Orleans going house to house taking up personal weapons, whether houses occupied by owner or empty, poor or rich, without regard to party, right. This shows me, Democrats may regulate them in our crowded society, but republicans with actually take them away and gun point. As usual your side does or has done what it falsely accuses the other side of doing. Don't continue to be a stooge for your false cause. Help shape what you think is intelligent regulation.Bull. Some of those idiots would want to ban all guns. Don't look for me to give up mine.like?but I have no problem with intelligent regulation.
"Intelligent regulation" means he'll support whatever Democrats propose
And yet any "intelligent regulation" is fine with you with no definition or scope of what that means. And you vote for the people who "intelligent regulation" means no guns in private hands
First of all, you're lying. A whole lot of the Democrat party, particularly the rabid left now running the party do want no guns in private hands. Joe kept saying he's a moderate, but he keeps letting the rabid left run him and the rest of you are silent. So just cut the shit private ownership of guns aren't on the way out the door and your actions are fully supporting that.
But let's pretend for a second that it isn't true. I asked you this before and you ran away and hid. What good is a gun for defense when you and your family are attacked on the street and your gun is locked in a safe at your home?
What post did you find the word in? If I used it, give the whole quote or at least a post number. Barring that, get a dictionary.You keep posting this silliness. explain what 'tougher' means. you haven't updated the other items we've asked you to respond to. So I will assume you have no clue what you're talking about.tougher
No they help regulate the idiots. If you want to stop criminals, think of some sort or crime bill, but be ready to put up with what you get.I would have thorough background checks on all weapon transfer by sale or otherwise, across the board except within direct family.like?but I have no problem with intelligent regulation.
There would be no rifles or shotguns on the streets of cities or town publicly carried other than for purchase or or maintenance and no magazine in the weapon even then. Only allowing in the home for home defense or on personal property and to and from ranges outside the city on private land, target practice on private land with owner permission or for hunting, but not on the city streets on some jackoff's shoulder locked and loaded.
I would favor carry permit after training and testing to same extent as I already have and is done in the at least 23 other states that recognize my permit, only I think all American citizens should have the same right and opportunity under the same restrictions to have access to the same training and process and regulations now in place here with out the interference of elected local politician. If somebody wants a gun free city, let them go out and buy a bunch land and build it on their own private property. Won't bother me, but I would never move there. One thing for sure, if you cannot guarantee 100% from criminals and morons with guns, you got no business banning guns and there is no way in hell you can guarantee that.
I would limit the number of weapons a person other than a licensed registered gun dealer can build and sell without becoming registered gun dealer and their builds would be required to be uniquely identifiable, instead of it being a closet side closet side hustle for people like me, who know how, to do it as unregulated business in trafficking arms. Not that I have ever built one for anybody else.
I am no fan of open carry side arms, from a tactical stand point as I am against intimidating the straights more than necessary, but I can live with it, after all, I have got mine, so not intimidated. I just prefer concealed carry personally.
Did that give you enough to bitch about?
Background checks do not stop criminals...they use straw buyers.......background checks are simply the Trojan horse for gun registration.
Hawaii....just won at the 9th circuit...they ban concealed carry and now they can ban open carry......any mandatory training for owning or carrying a gun will be used as a way to ban guns....that is the truth.
So you can’t provide any information on what you mean by ‘tougher’? Why can’t you?What post did you find the word in? If I used it, give the whole quote or at least a post number. Barring that, get a dictionary
He has no idea what he is taking about, avoids answering, disappears after a postFor example, the constitution refers to the FCC regulating interstate traffic, and clearly that means to ensure states do not impede interstate traffic in any way
Click the arrow next to your name. Takes you to the quote. Learn how quote features work idiot. I’m laughingWhat post did you find the word in? If I used it, give the whole quote or at least a post number. Barring that, get a dictionary.You keep posting this silliness. explain what 'tougher' means. you haven't updated the other items we've asked you to respond to. So I will assume you have no clue what you're talking about.tougher
This is a bullshit statement supported by ZERO evidence.HOW WILL THEY FIND MY GUN WHEN IT'S ON MY PERSON AND THE REST ARE IN A SAFE?Many suicide and homicide offenders find guns owned by their family members or friends.
Sadly many gun owners are not very careful.
If you had it before 1994 or got it after 2004 then ya, your good.How about that. My AR-15 build is from about 4 different manufacturers and not on the list, so I'm still a good guy, right?And when companies in certain states just say "Fuck you!" and keep on making them, and people keep on buying them, then what?Pretty sure the ban meant you could not buy a AR-15 period, you could keep one if you bought it before the ban. This from Wikipedia..He said he would like to see the reinstatement of the 1994 assault rifle ban. For ten years you could not buy anything like an AR-15 and the country did not suffer for it.
Or benefit from it. Couldn't buy guns here in Chicago for a long time.
Made zero difference as far as gun crime.
There was no problem buying AR-15s during the first ban. You just couldn‘t buy an AR-15 with certain cosmetic features such as a flash suppressor or a pistol grip.
In fact the first Federal Assault Weapons Ban is what made the AR-15 so popular. Prior to the ban the AR-15 had a poor reputation but when shooters actually bought some they realized how useful they are. The word spread rapidly. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban backfired.
So these "military" features, by which "assault weapons" can be distinguished from "permissible" semi-automatic rifles, were identified. These included folding or collapsible stocks, pistol grips, barrel shrouds, flash hiders, bayonet mounts, and grenade adapters. The original federal "assault weapons" ban defined the evil firearms as semi-automatic, detachable magazine-fed rifles with two or more of these "military features."
"Assault Weapons," "Cosmetic Features," and "Gun Control"
America's Most Aggressive Defender of Firearms Ownershipjpfo.org
The law also categorically banned the following makes and models of semi-automatic firearms and any copies or duplicates of them, in any caliber:
Name of firearm Preban federal legal status Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Technologies Avtomat Kalashnikovs (AKs) (all models) Imports banned in 1989* Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil Imports banned in 1989* Beretta AR-70 (SC-70) Imports banned in 1989* Colt AR-15 Legal Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN-LAR, FNC Imports banned in 1989* SWD (MAC type) M-10, M-11, M11/9, M12 Legal Steyr AUG Imports banned in 1989* INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22 Legal Revolving cylinder shotguns such as (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12 Legal
