Biden Calls For A Gun Ban After Colorado Shooting

[2aguy]

So some liberal extremist, Trump-Hating Whack-a-doodle with a Muslim-sounding name goes on a shooting spree, and Biden and the Democrats rush to use this as an excuse to strip LAW-ABIDING citizens of their 2nd Amendment Rights.

During the foreign-funded Democrat-supported domestic-terrorist violence of Antifa looting, pillaging, destroying, arsonist, raping, assaulting, and murdering Antifa terrorist acts in Democrat-run communities all over the country - that caused BILLIONS of dollars in damage and destroyed many Americans businesses / dreams...

Democrats arrested a couple for holding their legally-owned, Constitutionally protected personal weapons on their own property in front of their own house - in a 'Stand-Your Ground' state, to protect themselves and ther home from violent protestors who threatened their lives and threatened to burn down their House.

The trespassing terrorists were arrested for trespassing....and have already been released. The case by a liberal extremist AG against the couple is still on-going, has not been dropped, despite the fact that they did not do anything illegal and a bipartisan effort to get the charges dropped is on-going.

Biden and the Democrats, who are just screwing the majority of Americans as hard as they can as fast as they can have turned DC into the Iraqi 'Green Zone' defended by National Guard Troops because they are so deathly afraid that the Americans they are screwing and whose country they are turning into a 3rd-world socialist tyrannical country are going to rise up against them for what they are doing.

To ensure a successful revolt against their tyrannical transformation f this nation into a single-party Socialist state they HAVE to take the guns out of the hands of the people.

'Hell yes, we are coming after your AR-15s!'
- A bill has already been submitted by proven CCP Espionage Facilitator Diane Feinstein

Hell YES, we are coming for your guns. There was never any doubt.

Biden calls on Senate to pass gun control measures 'immediately' after Boulder shooting

President Biden on Tuesday implored the Senate to pass new gun control measures in the wake of a mass shooting that left 10 dead in Boulder, Colorado, this week.

www.foxnews.com

Stop with the hyperbole. He said he would like to see the reinstatement of the 1994 assault rifle ban. For ten years you could not buy anything like an AR-15 and the country did not suffer for it.

Moron, it had no effect on crime or mass public shootings......the Department of Justice research stated it had no effect......

There is no rational reason to ban 20 million AR-15 rifles currently in private hands or the millions of other rifles.......you don't know what you are talking about.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Human Life is Precious.

And that is why we have guns to protect innocent lives from violent criminals..

Justifiable homicides are rare. Here. They are about 30 times rarer then murders and 70 times rarer then suicides.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Rest in Peace -- 572,000 people in USA killed by guns in 1999-2016:

That is a lie......you have to put in suicides to get anywhere close to that...

2019 there were 10,235 gun murders.......

If we take that number and multiply it by the 17 years.....you twit.....you get 173,995.....and of the 10,235 gun murders...do you understand that 70-80% the victims are career criminals.....murdered by other criminals...and of the other 20-30%, the majority of those victims are friends and family of those very same criminals....

Each year in USA there are over 10,000 gun murders and over 20,000 gun suicides. Very tragic.

 

[Man of Ethics]

it had no effect on crime or mass public shootings......the Department of Justice research stated it had no effect......

Guns enable violent crime.

Using a knife or acid as is done in UK requires overcoming a much higher psychological barrier.

 

[Batcat]

He said he would like to see the reinstatement of the 1994 assault rifle ban. For ten years you could not buy anything like an AR-15 and the country did not suffer for it.

Or benefit from it. Couldn't buy guns here in Chicago for a long time.
Made zero difference as far as gun crime.

There was no problem buying AR-15s during the first ban. You just couldn‘t buy an AR-15 with certain cosmetic features such as a flash suppressor or a pistol grip.

In fact the first Federal Assault Weapons Ban is what made the AR-15 so popular. Prior to the ban the AR-15 had a poor reputation but when shooters actually bought some they realized how useful they are. The word spread rapidly. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban backfired.

So these "military" features, by which "assault weapons" can be distinguished from "permissible" semi-automatic rifles, were identified. These included folding or collapsible stocks, pistol grips, barrel shrouds, flash hiders, bayonet mounts, and grenade adapters. The original federal "assault weapons" ban defined the evil firearms as semi-automatic, detachable magazine-fed rifles with two or more of these "military features."

"Assault Weapons," "Cosmetic Features," and "Gun Control"

America's Most Aggressive Defender of Firearms Ownership

jpfo.org

 

[Man of Ethics]

Maybe if we see someone trying to commit suicide we should shoot them so they won't do it.

NO! Human life is G-d's creation. Human life has paramount value.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Definitely, free Mental Health help would be very beneficial to USA. But guns are extremely dangerous -- like Fentanyl.

How are guns dangerous? Mine just sit there.

Sadly someone with Severe Depression can find your gun. Guns are as dangerous as Opioids.

 

[Man of Ethics]

All suicides are preventable

Without guns, suicide rate would be much lower.

Why do you feel that?

I have read that most suicide attempts without guns do fail.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Sadly too many people are Atheists.

Atheists wouldn't obey a law against suicide?

Atheists do not believe they would be subject to a penalty for suicide.

 

[miketx]

Definitely, free Mental Health help would be very beneficial to USA. But guns are extremely dangerous -- like Fentanyl.

How are guns dangerous? Mine just sit there.

Sadly someone with Severe Depression can find your gun. Guns are as dangerous as Opioids.

How will they "find" my gun? And please a real answer and some "just because" bs.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Sadly someone with Severe Depression can find your gun. Guns are as dangerous as Opioids.

How will they "find" my gun? And please a real answer and some "just because" bs.

Many suicide and homicide offenders find guns owned by their family members or friends.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Wilkow (conservative radio host) made a good point today. For those that say the government won't be confiscating weapons, what about if they ban the AR15, making it illegal to own this weapon? That means, to be legal, you'd have to surrender that weapon, which is the same thing as confiscation.

Same would apply to any weapon they decided they wanted to make illegal. So, yes, it would be gun confiscation.

 

[freyasman]

Human Life is Precious.

And that is why we have guns to protect innocent lives from violent criminals..

Justifiable homicides are rare. Here. They are about 30 times rarer then murders and 70 times rarer then suicides.

There are a couple different reasons for that.
One, is that you usually don't have to kill someone to get them to stop attacking, you usually just have to demonstrate that you are both willing and able to.
And two, very few people, even lawyers, understand how to properly present an affirmative defense in court. So many people who were simply defending themselves, actually get prosecuted as the aggressor.


Using weapons in defense of one's self and property is extremely common...... having to kill someone while you're doing so, is a lot less common.

 

[2aguy]

it had no effect on crime or mass public shootings......the Department of Justice research stated it had no effect......

Guns enable violent crime.

Using a knife or acid as is done in UK requires overcoming a much higher psychological barrier.

Guns don't enable violent crime, considering the U.K. has more violent crime than the U.S.....you doofus.

Guns enable normal people to fight off violent criminals......to the tune of 1.1 million times a year in the U.S......

We thought Bier’s points were reasonable, so we tried to replicate his approach. We looked at the raw violent crime numbers for each country, using statistics for England and Wales for 2012 and for the United States for 2011, in a way that sought to compare apples to apples. (We should note that the United Kingdom includes Scotland and Northern Ireland, but the numbers in the meme appear to be based only on crime in England and Wales, which are calculated separately.)

For England and Wales, we added together three crime categories: "violence against the person, with injury," "most serious sexual crime," and "robbery." This produced a rate of 775 violent crimes per 100,000 people.

For the United States, we used the FBI’s four standard categories for violent crime that Bier cited. We came up with a rate of 383 violent crimes per 100,000 people.

Social media post says U.K. has far higher violent crime rate than U.S. does

The debate over gun policy has inspired a blizzard of messages on social media, from both supporters and opponents of gu

www.politifact.com

 

[Man of Ethics]

There are a couple different reasons for that.
One, is that you usually don't have to kill someone to get them to stop attacking, you usually just have to demonstrate that you are both willing and able to.
And two, very few people, even lawyers, understand how to properly present an affirmative defense in court. So many people who were simply defending themselves, actually get prosecuted as the aggressor.


Using weapons in defense of one's self and property is extremely common...... having to kill someone while you're doing so, is a lot less common.

Sadly, taking lives by Suicide and Homicide is an even more common use of guns.

 

[Man of Ethics]

Guns don't enable violent crime, considering the U.K. has more violent crime than the U.S.....you doofus.

In USA, homicide rate is higher then in UK Here. 4.96 in USA vs. 1.2 in UK.

 

[freyasman]

There are a couple different reasons for that.
One, is that you usually don't have to kill someone to get them to stop attacking, you usually just have to demonstrate that you are both willing and able to.
And two, very few people, even lawyers, understand how to properly present an affirmative defense in court. So many people who were simply defending themselves, actually get prosecuted as the aggressor.


Using weapons in defense of one's self and property is extremely common...... having to kill someone while you're doing so, is a lot less common.

Sadly, taking lives by Suicide and Homicide is an even more common use of guns.

No it isn't.


Don't you feel a bit uncomfortable talking about stuff you clearly don't know shit about? Isn't it embarrassing to talk out of your ass in public, like a fool?

 

[Ben Thomson]

He said he would like to see the reinstatement of the 1994 assault rifle ban. For ten years you could not buy anything like an AR-15 and the country did not suffer for it.

Or benefit from it. Couldn't buy guns here in Chicago for a long time.
Made zero difference as far as gun crime.

There was no problem buying AR-15s during the first ban. You just couldn‘t buy an AR-15 with certain cosmetic features such as a flash suppressor or a pistol grip.

In fact the first Federal Assault Weapons Ban is what made the AR-15 so popular. Prior to the ban the AR-15 had a poor reputation but when shooters actually bought some they realized how useful they are. The word spread rapidly. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban backfired.

So these "military" features, by which "assault weapons" can be distinguished from "permissible" semi-automatic rifles, were identified. These included folding or collapsible stocks, pistol grips, barrel shrouds, flash hiders, bayonet mounts, and grenade adapters. The original federal "assault weapons" ban defined the evil firearms as semi-automatic, detachable magazine-fed rifles with two or more of these "military features."

"Assault Weapons," "Cosmetic Features," and "Gun Control"

America's Most Aggressive Defender of Firearms Ownership

jpfo.org

Pretty sure the ban meant you could not buy a AR-15 period, you could keep one if you bought it before the ban. This from Wikipedia..

The law also categorically banned the following makes and models of semi-automatic firearms and any copies or duplicates of them, in any caliber:

Name of firearm	Preban federal legal status
Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Technologies Avtomat Kalashnikovs (AKs) (all models)	Imports banned in 1989*
Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil	Imports banned in 1989*
Beretta AR-70 (SC-70)	Imports banned in 1989*
Colt AR-15	Legal
Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN-LAR, FNC	Imports banned in 1989*
SWD (MAC type) M-10, M-11, M11/9, M12	Legal
Steyr AUG	Imports banned in 1989*
INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22	Legal
Revolving cylinder shotguns such as (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12	Legal

 

[freyasman]

He said he would like to see the reinstatement of the 1994 assault rifle ban. For ten years you could not buy anything like an AR-15 and the country did not suffer for it.

Or benefit from it. Couldn't buy guns here in Chicago for a long time.
Made zero difference as far as gun crime.

There was no problem buying AR-15s during the first ban. You just couldn‘t buy an AR-15 with certain cosmetic features such as a flash suppressor or a pistol grip.

In fact the first Federal Assault Weapons Ban is what made the AR-15 so popular. Prior to the ban the AR-15 had a poor reputation but when shooters actually bought some they realized how useful they are. The word spread rapidly. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban backfired.

So these "military" features, by which "assault weapons" can be distinguished from "permissible" semi-automatic rifles, were identified. These included folding or collapsible stocks, pistol grips, barrel shrouds, flash hiders, bayonet mounts, and grenade adapters. The original federal "assault weapons" ban defined the evil firearms as semi-automatic, detachable magazine-fed rifles with two or more of these "military features."

"Assault Weapons," "Cosmetic Features," and "Gun Control"

America's Most Aggressive Defender of Firearms Ownership

jpfo.org

Pretty sure the ban meant you could not buy a AR-15 period, you could keep one if you bought it before the ban. This from Wikipedia..

The law also categorically banned the following makes and models of semi-automatic firearms and any copies or duplicates of them, in any caliber:

Name of firearm	Preban federal legal status
Norinco, Mitchell, and Poly Technologies Avtomat Kalashnikovs (AKs) (all models)	Imports banned in 1989*
Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil	Imports banned in 1989*
Beretta AR-70 (SC-70)	Imports banned in 1989*
Colt AR-15	Legal
Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN-LAR, FNC	Imports banned in 1989*
SWD (MAC type) M-10, M-11, M11/9, M12	Legal
Steyr AUG	Imports banned in 1989*
INTRATEC TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22	Legal
Revolving cylinder shotguns such as (or similar to) the Street Sweeper and Striker 12	Legal

And when companies in certain states just say "Fuck you!" and keep on making them, and people keep on buying them, then what?

 

[2aguy]

Guns don't enable violent crime, considering the U.K. has more violent crime than the U.S.....you doofus.

In USA, homicide rate is higher then in UK Here. 4.96 in USA vs. 1.2 in UK.

Violent crime is higher in the U.K........70-80% of our gun murder victims are criminals murdered by other criminals......and of the rest, the majority of the victims are associates, friends and family of criminals...

Meanwhile, you ignore the fact that Americans use their legal guns to save lives......they use those guns, on average 1.1 million times a year to stop rapes, robberies and murders...according to our Centers for Disease control...

Can you tell which number is higher?