Bi-Partisan Committee Report On 6 Jan Capitol Violence Released

[postman]

You will be seeing more of the following which the media will try and hide- After the protestors were let inside and things were going well there was a sudden, late surge of about 25 people from the outside, through the doors and to the back of the peaceful group. They are where the trouble came from and They Are the Pelosi plants.

25 people, in the back of a crowd of at least 1,000 people. And they caused all the trouble?

Smoke 'em if you got 'em

 

[Lesh]

Finally, the Committee stated it believed the USCP, nor the FBI, US Secret Service, Metropolitan Police, or other law enforcement partners knew thousands of rioters were ‘planning an attack’ on the US Capitol.

That they WERE planning is not a question

The article posted stated no agency found any evidence that would lead them to believe such a large violent event had been planned.

And

"The report stated that the USCP Intel Bureau place more attention on social media posts to gauge threat levels, which is how the FBI reportedly uncovered the advanced planning for violence at the Capitol n6 Jan."

Do you read your own posts?

 

[WEATHER53]

You will be seeing more of the following which the media will try and hide- After the protestors were let inside and things were going well there was a sudden, late surge of about 25 people from the outside, through the doors and to the back of the peaceful group. They are where the trouble came from and They Are the Pelosi plants.

25 people, in the back of a crowd of at least 1,000 people. And they caused all the trouble?

Smoke 'em if you got 'em

There were never anywhere near 1,000 people all at once in the rotunda. There may have been 1,000 total pass through the building during the entire event
You again are attempting to present mathematical charlitry.
Deception you are poor at because math and stats your are devoid of

 

[wamose]

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.

Yet Pelosi did nothing, and the guards let them in.

Pelosi did exactly what Jesse Smolette would have done. It's called lying and conniving. Lucky for liberals that our totally corrupt media will back up every stupid and far fetched move they make.

 

[Crepitus]

President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present

Gonna hafta see some proof of that.

Former Secretary of Defense Mark Meadows testified President Trump ordered 10,000 National Guard members be told to be ready to be activated and respond if needed. Meadows added the president had offered national Guard to be activated and provided security in DC prior to 6 Jan but that the offer had been rejected.

Trump Offered 10,000 National Guard Troops To Protect Capitol Multiple Times Before Jan 6 and His Offer was Rebuked Every Time

You've already heard all the lies about January 6 and what led up to a riot that broke out at

djhjmedia.com

The NY Times reported the DC national Guard were activated immediately AFTER the 6 Jan violence and that all 1,100 had arrived and helped set up a perimeter around the Capitol by 6pm that night.
- This proves the National Guard had been told to be ready to be activated in advance. The violence officially began at 12:53pm - it is virtually impossible to recall 1,100 National Guard Members, have them report, assemble, travel to a DC force deployment/dispersion point, and assist in creating a perimeter in 5 hours unless they have been told in advance to be ready.

As the D.C. police clear the Capitol grounds, the mayor extends a public emergency. (Published 2021)

www.nytimes.com

Timeline of the January 6 United States Capitol attack - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(The NYT added, "President Trump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard, according to a person with knowledge of the events." Of course we all know how valid the left wing media's 'anonymous' sources are, as they were exposed in a vast majority of the time to be the reporters themselves, which made it easier for the NYT to continue to post false stories about the exposed bogus, debunked 'Trump-Russia collusion.)

President Trump actually suggested to numerous cities across the country to use national Guard troops to reinstate control. law, and order as Antifa and BLM looted, burned, held city blocks hostage, etc....but his suggestion was rebuffed / rejected over and over again.


THEN THERE IS THIS:

"The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it."

ACCORDING TO NPR Steven Sund, former Chief of the USCP, stated he DID request activation of the National Guard but that his request was REJECTED by 'security officials' at the House and Senate.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.npr.org

Sund, who was asked to step down by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the USCP's failure to protect the capitol, stated it was House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving who rejected the idea of activating the national Guard because he was more concerned about the OPTICS rather than preparing / preventing / protecting:

"Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence."

Irving, who had been House Sgt-of-Arms since 2012, resigned after the 6 Jan Capitol violence.


INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, SPEAKER PELOSI DID NOT INITIALLY CALL THE EVENTS OF 6 JAN AN ATTEMPTED 'INSURRECTION'. SHE DESCRIBED IS AS "COMMITTING ACTS OF VANDALISM AND DELAYING THE CERTIICATION PROCESS":


"Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving will resign over the massive security breach of the United States Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday.

The California Democrat called for Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund to resign after rioters supporting President Donald Trump stormed the United States Capitol building Wednesday, committing acts of vandalism and delaying the certification process as members of Congress were forced to evacuate the House and Senate chambers."

House Sergeant-At-Arms Paul Irving Resigns Over Massive Security Breach Of Capitol

Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving is resigning over the massive security breach of the Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

dailycaller.com

Fact checking that:

AP FACT CHECK: Trump distorts record on National Guard in DC

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is distorting how he responded to the chaos at the Capitol this week, falsely stating that he acted immediately to bring in the National Guard.

apnews.com

 

[struth]

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.

he made the recommendation he has no authority on the Hill. That’s the legislative branch. Nancy ignored the warnings

I appreciate the investigation and report

So why did they dems want to fund another one?

 

[Clipper]

Notice how the media always sensationalizes the Jan. 6 protest by calling it the "deadly Capitol riot"? It wasn't even a fuckin' "riot."

Just how "deadly" was it compared to an entire Summer of antifa and BLM riots, lootings, arson, and murder?

Just a stroll in the park, right? Tell that to the families of the cops who died & injured by your mob. And that prick with ears Trump & his Congressional lackeys don't want a commission because the c- suckers are afraid of what will come out. Especially Trump's lapdogs McCarthy & a few others. If they did nothing wrong they'd agree to it. Got that?

 

[Clipper]

Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.

Food for thought.

If that were the case pumpkin, then the dems wouldn't have had to send their brown shirts to embed in the group nor would they have had the time.

How many times did Trump's lackeys in Congress cut the budget for security around the capital, Ace?

 

[Clipper]

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.

Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?

Being disappointed that nothing was going to keep him in power.

And 3.5 hours later this is what he told his goons:

President Trump’s Chilling Message to Violent Mob Overtaking Capitol: ‘Go Home. We Love You, You’re Very Special’​

I'm surprised Dotard didn't offer to pay their legal bills. And they would have believed him.

 

[Clipper]

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.

he made the recommendation he has no authority on the Hill. That’s the legislative branch. Nancy ignored the warnings

I appreciate the investigation and report

So why did they dems want to fund another one?

Trump's GOP lackeys in Congress cut the budget for security around the capital more then once, dummy. But go ahead & get your rocks off blaming Pelosi if it makes you feel better.

 

[Mac1958]

Notice how the media always sensationalizes the Jan. 6 protest by calling it the "deadly Capitol riot"? It wasn't even a fuckin' "riot."

Just how "deadly" was it compared to an entire Summer of antifa and BLM riots, lootings, arson, and murder?

Just a stroll in the park, right? Tell that to the families of the cops who died & injured by your mob. And that prick with ears Trump & his Congressional lackeys don't want a commission because the c- suckers are afraid of what will come out. Especially Trump's lapdogs McCarthy & a few others. If they did nothing wrong they'd agree to it. Got that?

The pre-attack planning, the injuries to the cops, the physical attacks, people in the building running for their lives, the cops screaming for help, on and on. I'm sure this report will yield some interesting stuff.

All of which will be denied, denigrated and dismissed by the jihadis and those who support them, of course.

It was just a tour that got a little rowdy, that's all. No big deal. MAGA. Freedom.

 

[struth]

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.

he made the recommendation he has no authority on the Hill. That’s the legislative branch. Nancy ignored the warnings

I appreciate the investigation and report

So why did they dems want to fund another one?

Trump's GOP lackeys in Congress cut the budget for security around the capital more then once, dummy. But go ahead & get your rocks off blaming Pelosi if it makes you feel better.

show me when that happened?

and what does that have to do with her ignoring the recommendation for the guard?

the budget for the cap hill police went from just over $115 million in 2000 to over $500 million in 2020...to guard 2 sq miles

 

[Clipper]

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.

Yet Pelosi did nothing, and the guards let them in.

Yea, Pelosi did nothing because she wanted to mob in there to help overturn the election which was about to certify the winner as DEMOCRAT JOE BIDEN! Got it, fool.

 

[jknowgood]

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.

Yet Pelosi did nothing, and the guards let them in.

Yea, Pelosi did nothing because she wanted to mob in there to help overturn the election which was about to certify the winner as DEMOCRAT JOE BIDEN! Got it, fool.

No, she wanted it to happen dumbass.

 

[easyt65]

President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present

Gonna hafta see some proof of that.

Former Secretary of Defense Mark Meadows testified President Trump ordered 10,000 National Guard members be told to be ready to be activated and respond if needed. Meadows added the president had offered national Guard to be activated and provided security in DC prior to 6 Jan but that the offer had been rejected.

Trump Offered 10,000 National Guard Troops To Protect Capitol Multiple Times Before Jan 6 and His Offer was Rebuked Every Time

You've already heard all the lies about January 6 and what led up to a riot that broke out at

djhjmedia.com

The NY Times reported the DC national Guard were activated immediately AFTER the 6 Jan violence and that all 1,100 had arrived and helped set up a perimeter around the Capitol by 6pm that night.
- This proves the National Guard had been told to be ready to be activated in advance. The violence officially began at 12:53pm - it is virtually impossible to recall 1,100 National Guard Members, have them report, assemble, travel to a DC force deployment/dispersion point, and assist in creating a perimeter in 5 hours unless they have been told in advance to be ready.

As the D.C. police clear the Capitol grounds, the mayor extends a public emergency. (Published 2021)

www.nytimes.com

Timeline of the January 6 United States Capitol attack - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(The NYT added, "President Trump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard, according to a person with knowledge of the events." Of course we all know how valid the left wing media's 'anonymous' sources are, as they were exposed in a vast majority of the time to be the reporters themselves, which made it easier for the NYT to continue to post false stories about the exposed bogus, debunked 'Trump-Russia collusion.)

President Trump actually suggested to numerous cities across the country to use national Guard troops to reinstate control. law, and order as Antifa and BLM looted, burned, held city blocks hostage, etc....but his suggestion was rebuffed / rejected over and over again.


THEN THERE IS THIS:

"The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it."

ACCORDING TO NPR Steven Sund, former Chief of the USCP, stated he DID request activation of the National Guard but that his request was REJECTED by 'security officials' at the House and Senate.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.npr.org

Sund, who was asked to step down by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the USCP's failure to protect the capitol, stated it was House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving who rejected the idea of activating the national Guard because he was more concerned about the OPTICS rather than preparing / preventing / protecting:

"Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence."

Irving, who had been House Sgt-of-Arms since 2012, resigned after the 6 Jan Capitol violence.


INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, SPEAKER PELOSI DID NOT INITIALLY CALL THE EVENTS OF 6 JAN AN ATTEMPTED 'INSURRECTION'. SHE DESCRIBED IS AS "COMMITTING ACTS OF VANDALISM AND DELAYING THE CERTIICATION PROCESS":


"Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving will resign over the massive security breach of the United States Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday.

The California Democrat called for Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund to resign after rioters supporting President Donald Trump stormed the United States Capitol building Wednesday, committing acts of vandalism and delaying the certification process as members of Congress were forced to evacuate the House and Senate chambers."

House Sergeant-At-Arms Paul Irving Resigns Over Massive Security Breach Of Capitol

Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving is resigning over the massive security breach of the Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

dailycaller.com

Fact checking that:

AP FACT CHECK: Trump distorts record on National Guard in DC

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is distorting how he responded to the chaos at the Capitol this week, falsely stating that he acted immediately to bring in the National Guard.

apnews.com

Notice I primarily did not mention President Trump as I talked about the National Guard but instead focused more on other news sources and people whowere there / involved?!

 

[Crepitus]

President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present

Gonna hafta see some proof of that.

Former Secretary of Defense Mark Meadows testified President Trump ordered 10,000 National Guard members be told to be ready to be activated and respond if needed. Meadows added the president had offered national Guard to be activated and provided security in DC prior to 6 Jan but that the offer had been rejected.

Trump Offered 10,000 National Guard Troops To Protect Capitol Multiple Times Before Jan 6 and His Offer was Rebuked Every Time

You've already heard all the lies about January 6 and what led up to a riot that broke out at

djhjmedia.com

The NY Times reported the DC national Guard were activated immediately AFTER the 6 Jan violence and that all 1,100 had arrived and helped set up a perimeter around the Capitol by 6pm that night.
- This proves the National Guard had been told to be ready to be activated in advance. The violence officially began at 12:53pm - it is virtually impossible to recall 1,100 National Guard Members, have them report, assemble, travel to a DC force deployment/dispersion point, and assist in creating a perimeter in 5 hours unless they have been told in advance to be ready.

As the D.C. police clear the Capitol grounds, the mayor extends a public emergency. (Published 2021)

www.nytimes.com

Timeline of the January 6 United States Capitol attack - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(The NYT added, "President Trump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard, according to a person with knowledge of the events." Of course we all know how valid the left wing media's 'anonymous' sources are, as they were exposed in a vast majority of the time to be the reporters themselves, which made it easier for the NYT to continue to post false stories about the exposed bogus, debunked 'Trump-Russia collusion.)

President Trump actually suggested to numerous cities across the country to use national Guard troops to reinstate control. law, and order as Antifa and BLM looted, burned, held city blocks hostage, etc....but his suggestion was rebuffed / rejected over and over again.


THEN THERE IS THIS:

"The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it."

ACCORDING TO NPR Steven Sund, former Chief of the USCP, stated he DID request activation of the National Guard but that his request was REJECTED by 'security officials' at the House and Senate.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.npr.org

Sund, who was asked to step down by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the USCP's failure to protect the capitol, stated it was House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving who rejected the idea of activating the national Guard because he was more concerned about the OPTICS rather than preparing / preventing / protecting:

"Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence."

Irving, who had been House Sgt-of-Arms since 2012, resigned after the 6 Jan Capitol violence.


INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, SPEAKER PELOSI DID NOT INITIALLY CALL THE EVENTS OF 6 JAN AN ATTEMPTED 'INSURRECTION'. SHE DESCRIBED IS AS "COMMITTING ACTS OF VANDALISM AND DELAYING THE CERTIICATION PROCESS":


"Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving will resign over the massive security breach of the United States Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday.

The California Democrat called for Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund to resign after rioters supporting President Donald Trump stormed the United States Capitol building Wednesday, committing acts of vandalism and delaying the certification process as members of Congress were forced to evacuate the House and Senate chambers."

House Sergeant-At-Arms Paul Irving Resigns Over Massive Security Breach Of Capitol

Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving is resigning over the massive security breach of the Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

dailycaller.com

Fact checking that:

AP FACT CHECK: Trump distorts record on National Guard in DC

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is distorting how he responded to the chaos at the Capitol this week, falsely stating that he acted immediately to bring in the National Guard.

apnews.com

Notice I primarily did not mention President Trump as I talked about the National Guard but instead focused more on other news sources and people whowere there / involved?!

Notice that the person I was responding to did.

Was that you?

 

[easyt65]

President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present

Gonna hafta see some proof of that.

Former Secretary of Defense Mark Meadows testified President Trump ordered 10,000 National Guard members be told to be ready to be activated and respond if needed. Meadows added the president had offered national Guard to be activated and provided security in DC prior to 6 Jan but that the offer had been rejected.

Trump Offered 10,000 National Guard Troops To Protect Capitol Multiple Times Before Jan 6 and His Offer was Rebuked Every Time

You've already heard all the lies about January 6 and what led up to a riot that broke out at

djhjmedia.com

The NY Times reported the DC national Guard were activated immediately AFTER the 6 Jan violence and that all 1,100 had arrived and helped set up a perimeter around the Capitol by 6pm that night.
- This proves the National Guard had been told to be ready to be activated in advance. The violence officially began at 12:53pm - it is virtually impossible to recall 1,100 National Guard Members, have them report, assemble, travel to a DC force deployment/dispersion point, and assist in creating a perimeter in 5 hours unless they have been told in advance to be ready.

As the D.C. police clear the Capitol grounds, the mayor extends a public emergency. (Published 2021)

www.nytimes.com

Timeline of the January 6 United States Capitol attack - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(The NYT added, "President Trump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard, according to a person with knowledge of the events." Of course we all know how valid the left wing media's 'anonymous' sources are, as they were exposed in a vast majority of the time to be the reporters themselves, which made it easier for the NYT to continue to post false stories about the exposed bogus, debunked 'Trump-Russia collusion.)

President Trump actually suggested to numerous cities across the country to use national Guard troops to reinstate control. law, and order as Antifa and BLM looted, burned, held city blocks hostage, etc....but his suggestion was rebuffed / rejected over and over again.


THEN THERE IS THIS:

"The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it."

ACCORDING TO NPR Steven Sund, former Chief of the USCP, stated he DID request activation of the National Guard but that his request was REJECTED by 'security officials' at the House and Senate.

Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots

Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.

www.npr.org

Sund, who was asked to step down by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the USCP's failure to protect the capitol, stated it was House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving who rejected the idea of activating the national Guard because he was more concerned about the OPTICS rather than preparing / preventing / protecting:

"Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence."

Irving, who had been House Sgt-of-Arms since 2012, resigned after the 6 Jan Capitol violence.


INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, SPEAKER PELOSI DID NOT INITIALLY CALL THE EVENTS OF 6 JAN AN ATTEMPTED 'INSURRECTION'. SHE DESCRIBED IS AS "COMMITTING ACTS OF VANDALISM AND DELAYING THE CERTIICATION PROCESS":


"Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving will resign over the massive security breach of the United States Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday.

The California Democrat called for Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund to resign after rioters supporting President Donald Trump stormed the United States Capitol building Wednesday, committing acts of vandalism and delaying the certification process as members of Congress were forced to evacuate the House and Senate chambers."

House Sergeant-At-Arms Paul Irving Resigns Over Massive Security Breach Of Capitol

Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving is resigning over the massive security breach of the Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.

dailycaller.com

Fact checking that:

AP FACT CHECK: Trump distorts record on National Guard in DC

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is distorting how he responded to the chaos at the Capitol this week, falsely stating that he acted immediately to bring in the National Guard.

apnews.com

Notice I primarily did not mention President Trump as I talked about the National Guard but instead focused more on other news sources and people whowere there / involved?!

Notice that the person I was responding to did.

Was that you?

Doesn't matter. The sources i used pretty much rendered your attempted point moot / failed.

 

[easyt65]

I'm surprised Dotard didn't offer to pay their legal bills. And they would have believed him.

You mean the way Barak Obama, VP Harris, and other prominent Liberals / Democrats paid the bails of the foreign-funded, Democrat-supported domestic terrorists Antifa & BLM who had been arrested looting, destroying, burning, and even trying to murder cops by burning them alive by throwing Molotov cocktails on police cars with the officers inside?

"I'm surprised Dotard DIDN'T...."

VP Harris DID
Barry DID
Biden's own staff DID

Biden staff donate to group that pays bail in riot-torn Minneapolis

Campaign staff for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are advertising their donations to a group that pays bail fees in Minneapolis after the city's police jailed people protesting the killing of a black man by a white police officer.

www.reuters.com

 

[Clipper]

I'm surprised Dotard didn't offer to pay their legal bills. And they would have believed him.

You mean the way Barak Obama, VP Harris, and other prominent Liberals / Democrats paid the bails of the foreign-funded, Democrat-supported domestic terrorists Antifa & BLM who had been arrested looting, destroying, burning, and even trying to murder cops by burning them alive by throwing Molotov cocktails on police cars with the officers inside?

"I'm surprised Dotard DIDN'T...."

VP Harris DID
Barry DID
Biden's own staff DID

Biden staff donate to group that pays bail in riot-torn Minneapolis

Campaign staff for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are advertising their donations to a group that pays bail fees in Minneapolis after the city's police jailed people protesting the killing of a black man by a white police officer.

www.reuters.com

Clown, you forgot to mention Soros. Remeber how your boy promised to pay the legal bills of troublemakers at his campaign rallies? Then screwed them?

 

[easyt65]

Clown, you forgot to mention Soros. Remeber how your boy promised to pay the legal bills of troublemakers at his campaign rallies? Then screwed them?

"I'm surprised Dotard DIDN'T...."

VP Harris DID
Barry DID
Biden's own staff DID


Remember how Hillary's campaign paid thugs to beat and bloody Trump supporters at Trump rallies?

Fact-Check: Yes, the Hillary Clinton Campaign Used Activists to Disrupt Trump Rallies | Breitbart

In answering a question about fitness for the presidency, Republican nominee Donald Trump claimed that the Hillary Clinton campaign paid protesters to “be violent” and to “cause fights.” - Fact-Check | Politics

www.breitbart.com

Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

Two top Democratic strategists have exited the presidential campaign after explosive undercover videos showed them discussing voter fraud and their roles in planting paid agitators at campaign events for Republican candidate Donald Trump.

www.washingtontimes.com

Snowflakes really need to stop PROJECTING and embrace the harsh reality.