Bi-Partisan Committee Report On 6 Jan Capitol Violence Released

Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Yet Pelosi did nothing, and the guards let them in.
Pelosi did nothing and neither did Mitch McConnel, you do remember that Congress has two parts? The heads of security were found to be Trump supporters and were fired over dereliction of duty. You do know what duty is don't you?
 
Not even their trusted sources can break through the pig-headed cognitive dissonance of the committed moonbat.
'Trusted Sources'? New Your Times 'reporters' have even used themselves as their source:

"That link? To my own post at HardballTalk in which I specifically call out Roberts for irresponsibly tossing the slum lord accusation around in the past. In other words: she is citing herself...."

 
Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Yet Pelosi did nothing, and the guards let them in.
Pelosi did nothing and neither did Mitch McConnel, you do remember that Congress has two parts? The heads of security were found to be Trump supporters and were fired over dereliction of duty. You do know what duty is don't you?
Pelosi is the leader of the house is she not?
 
Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
 
Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
Being disappointed that nothing was going to keep him in power.
 
Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.

Food for thought.
If that were the case pumpkin, then the dems wouldn't have had to send their brown shirts to embed in the group nor would they have had the time.
 
Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
They were willing to examine the Capitol Police’s response to the attack but not the Presidents.

Why did he take so long to respond to the angry mob?
Who did he call when the attack was going on?
Why didn’t he protect his Vice President?
Who was advising him and updating him?
 
Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.

Food for thought.
Anyone with a brain knew it would turn violent. Hell, we saw some of the chatter right here in USMB. 4Chan, Parler and other social media were worse. They were sharing maps of the building, discussing what weapons to bring and which were the most vulnerable access points.

“Will be Wild!” :icon_rolleyes:
 
President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present
Gonna hafta see some proof of that.
Former Secretary of Defense Mark Meadows testified President Trump ordered 10,000 National Guard members be told to be ready to be activated and respond if needed. Meadows added the president had offered national Guard to be activated and provided security in DC prior to 6 Jan but that the offer had been rejected.




The NY Times reported the DC national Guard were activated immediately AFTER the 6 Jan violence and that all 1,100 had arrived and helped set up a perimeter around the Capitol by 6pm that night.
- This proves the National Guard had been told to be ready to be activated in advance. The violence officially began at 12:53pm - it is virtually impossible to recall 1,100 National Guard Members, have them report, assemble, travel to a DC force deployment/dispersion point, and assist in creating a perimeter in 5 hours unless they have been told in advance to be ready.



(The NYT added, "President Trump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard, according to a person with knowledge of the events." Of course we all know how valid the left wing media's 'anonymous' sources are, as they were exposed in a vast majority of the time to be the reporters themselves, which made it easier for the NYT to continue to post false stories about the exposed bogus, debunked 'Trump-Russia collusion.)

President Trump actually suggested to numerous cities across the country to use national Guard troops to reinstate control. law, and order as Antifa and BLM looted, burned, held city blocks hostage, etc....but his suggestion was rebuffed / rejected over and over again.


THEN THERE IS THIS:

"The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.

Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.

Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it."


ACCORDING TO NPR Steven Sund, former Chief of the USCP, stated he DID request activation of the National Guard but that his request was REJECTED by 'security officials' at the House and Senate.



Sund, who was asked to step down by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the USCP's failure to protect the capitol, stated it was House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving who rejected the idea of activating the national Guard because he was more concerned about the OPTICS rather than preparing / preventing / protecting:

"Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence."

Irving, who had been House Sgt-of-Arms since 2012, resigned after the 6 Jan Capitol violence.


INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, SPEAKER PELOSI DID NOT INITIALLY CALL THE EVENTS OF 6 JAN AN ATTEMPTED 'INSURRECTION'. SHE DESCRIBED IS AS "COMMITTING ACTS OF VANDALISM AND DELAYING THE CERTIICATION PROCESS":


"Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving will resign over the massive security breach of the United States Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday.

The California Democrat called for Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund to resign after rioters supporting President Donald Trump stormed the United States Capitol building Wednesday, committing acts of vandalism and delaying the certification process as members of Congress were forced to evacuate the House and Senate chambers."


You lost me at “Mark Meadows testified”.
Trust nothing that flies out of that man’s piehole. He was busy begging DOJ to investigate Italygate at the time.
 
Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
Yeah, they should have tried harder to dissect and spin Trump's call for people to 'peacefully walk to the Capitol' and 'support GOP politicians'.

:p
 
Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.

Food for thought.
Anyone with a brain knew it would turn violent. Hell, we saw some of the chatter right here in USMB. 4Chan, Parler and other social media were worse. They were sharing maps of the building, discussing what weapons to bring and which were the most vulnerable access points.

“Will be Wild!” :icon_rolleyes:
And weapons and pipe bombs were planted in advance, as we have seen in / at so many violent Antifa / BLM riots in the past....
 
Just how "deadly" was it compared to an entire Summer of antifa and BLM riots, lootings, arson, and murder?

Good point. We shouldn't have thought much of the atomic bombs we dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, because compared to the fire bombing of Tokyo, they were just a fraction as devastating. Curtis LaMay's attack on Tokyo was like the summer of BLM, while Hiroshima was like January 6th.
 
Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.

yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
They were willing to examine the Capitol Police’s response to the attack but not the Presidents.

Why did he take so long to respond to the angry mob?
Who did he call when the attack was going on?
Why didn’t he protect his Vice President?
Who was advising him and updating him?
Not to mention the role certain members of congress and Rump’s pals. Roger Stone was there too flanked by members of the Proud Boys. Have we looked at all their phone logs? We damn well should!
 
Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
Yeah, they should have tried harder to dissect and spin Trump's call for people to 'peacefully walk to the Capitol' and 'support GOP politicians'.

:p
Out of context and highly dishonest. But you do you!
 
Not to mention the role certain members of congress and Rump’s pals. Roger Stone was there too flanked by members of the Proud Boys. Have we looked at all their phone logs? We damn well should!
why isn't it in the report then?
 

Forum List

Back
Top