Moonglow
Diamond Member
He is the commander in chief are you familiar with that position?
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
He had no power to do anything, you drooling retard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is the commander in chief are you familiar with that position?
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
He had no power to do anything, you drooling retard.
Pelosi did nothing and neither did Mitch McConnel, you do remember that Congress has two parts? The heads of security were found to be Trump supporters and were fired over dereliction of duty. You do know what duty is don't you?Yet Pelosi did nothing, and the guards let them in.Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
99% of America could not care less
But left loons hang onto it
'Trusted Sources'? New Your Times 'reporters' have even used themselves as their source:Not even their trusted sources can break through the pig-headed cognitive dissonance of the committed moonbat.
Pelosi is the leader of the house is she not?Pelosi did nothing and neither did Mitch McConnel, you do remember that Congress has two parts? The heads of security were found to be Trump supporters and were fired over dereliction of duty. You do know what duty is don't you?Yet Pelosi did nothing, and the guards let them in.Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Being disappointed that nothing was going to keep him in power.Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
If that were the case pumpkin, then the dems wouldn't have had to send their brown shirts to embed in the group nor would they have had the time.Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.
Food for thought.
They were willing to examine the Capitol Police’s response to the attack but not the Presidents.Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Anyone with a brain knew it would turn violent. Hell, we saw some of the chatter right here in USMB. 4Chan, Parler and other social media were worse. They were sharing maps of the building, discussing what weapons to bring and which were the most vulnerable access points.Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.
Food for thought.
You lost me at “Mark Meadows testified”.Former Secretary of Defense Mark Meadows testified President Trump ordered 10,000 National Guard members be told to be ready to be activated and respond if needed. Meadows added the president had offered national Guard to be activated and provided security in DC prior to 6 Jan but that the offer had been rejected.Gonna hafta see some proof of that.President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present
![]()
Trump Offered 10,000 National Guard Troops To Protect Capitol Multiple Times Before Jan 6 and His Offer was Rebuked Every Time
You've already heard all the lies about January 6 and what led up to a riot that broke out atdjhjmedia.com
The NY Times reported the DC national Guard were activated immediately AFTER the 6 Jan violence and that all 1,100 had arrived and helped set up a perimeter around the Capitol by 6pm that night.
- This proves the National Guard had been told to be ready to be activated in advance. The violence officially began at 12:53pm - it is virtually impossible to recall 1,100 National Guard Members, have them report, assemble, travel to a DC force deployment/dispersion point, and assist in creating a perimeter in 5 hours unless they have been told in advance to be ready.
Timeline of the January 6 United States Capitol attack - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
(The NYT added, "President Trump initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard, according to a person with knowledge of the events." Of course we all know how valid the left wing media's 'anonymous' sources are, as they were exposed in a vast majority of the time to be the reporters themselves, which made it easier for the NYT to continue to post false stories about the exposed bogus, debunked 'Trump-Russia collusion.)
President Trump actually suggested to numerous cities across the country to use national Guard troops to reinstate control. law, and order as Antifa and BLM looted, burned, held city blocks hostage, etc....but his suggestion was rebuffed / rejected over and over again.
THEN THERE IS THIS:
"The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.
Former chief Steven Sund -- who resigned his post last week after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called for him to step down -- made the assertions in an interview with The Washington Post published Sunday.
Sund contradicts claims made by officials after Wednesday's assault on Capitol Hill. Sund's superiors said previously that the National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it."
ACCORDING TO NPR Steven Sund, former Chief of the USCP, stated he DID request activation of the National Guard but that his request was REJECTED by 'security officials' at the House and Senate.
![]()
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.www.npr.org
Sund, who was asked to step down by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the USCP's failure to protect the capitol, stated it was House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving who rejected the idea of activating the national Guard because he was more concerned about the OPTICS rather than preparing / preventing / protecting:
"Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence."
Irving, who had been House Sgt-of-Arms since 2012, resigned after the 6 Jan Capitol violence.
INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, SPEAKER PELOSI DID NOT INITIALLY CALL THE EVENTS OF 6 JAN AN ATTEMPTED 'INSURRECTION'. SHE DESCRIBED IS AS "COMMITTING ACTS OF VANDALISM AND DELAYING THE CERTIICATION PROCESS":
"Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving will resign over the massive security breach of the United States Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Thursday.
The California Democrat called for Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund to resign after rioters supporting President Donald Trump stormed the United States Capitol building Wednesday, committing acts of vandalism and delaying the certification process as members of Congress were forced to evacuate the House and Senate chambers."
![]()
House Sergeant-At-Arms Paul Irving Resigns Over Massive Security Breach Of Capitol
Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives Paul Irving is resigning over the massive security breach of the Capitol, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said.dailycaller.com
Yeah, they should have tried harder to dissect and spin Trump's call for people to 'peacefully walk to the Capitol' and 'support GOP politicians'.Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
And weapons and pipe bombs were planted in advance, as we have seen in / at so many violent Antifa / BLM riots in the past....Anyone with a brain knew it would turn violent. Hell, we saw some of the chatter right here in USMB. 4Chan, Parler and other social media were worse. They were sharing maps of the building, discussing what weapons to bring and which were the most vulnerable access points.Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.
Food for thought.
“Will be Wild!”![]()
Just how "deadly" was it compared to an entire Summer of antifa and BLM riots, lootings, arson, and murder?
Not to mention the role certain members of congress and Rump’s pals. Roger Stone was there too flanked by members of the Proud Boys. Have we looked at all their phone logs? We damn well should!They were willing to examine the Capitol Police’s response to the attack but not the Presidents.Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?Despite President Trump recommending the National Guard be activated and present, despite the FBI discovering social media ‘chatter’ about potential planned violence in advance, the National Guard were not activated and used to deter / prevent the violence.
yet he did nothing also..Even after the fact he did nothing..Because he was the instigator.
Why did he take so long to respond to the angry mob?
Who did he call when the attack was going on?
Why didn’t he protect his Vice President?
Who was advising him and updating him?
Out of context and highly dishonest. But you do you!Yeah, they should have tried harder to dissect and spin Trump's call for people to 'peacefully walk to the Capitol' and 'support GOP politicians'.Yep, that was the lamest thing about this report. They didn’t bother examining Trumpy Bear’s role. And WTF was he doing for 3 hours other than watching TeeVee with glee?
![]()
not the president.The FBI and the DHS work for who exactly?Fascinating that Trump knew that the rally was likely to turn violent but had it anyway.
Food for thought.
Where does it say that in the article? It doesn't even mention Trump.
why isn't it in the report then?Not to mention the role certain members of congress and Rump’s pals. Roger Stone was there too flanked by members of the Proud Boys. Have we looked at all their phone logs? We damn well should!
Nope!Out of context and highly dishonest. But you do you!
Commander in Chief of what? Come on snowflake, tell us!!!!!! Or, will you play ignorant as always?He is the commander in chief are you familiar with that position?