Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[markef]

Now you're jumping from Georgia to Michigan? What fraud in Michigan are you talking about?

The evidence of 2020 fraud is widespread and involves democrat wards in several states.

 

[markef]

If their "facts" are are false, that source is not trustworthy.

I agree. Any person or publication that lied about Trump/Russian collusion is not trustworthy.

 

[markef]

Seriously, if you want to make an argument try posting something from a human being.

Nobody would take AI as a serious substitution for human research.

What about Wikipedia? Is that acceptable?

Bias • June 21st, 2024

Is Wikipedia Biased?​

Media Bias,Wikipedia Bias,AllSides Media Bias Ratings

By Julie Mastrine

Updated 1/4/2023, 8/16/22, and 6/21/2024. Originally published 3/16/21.

Is Wikipedia biased?

Hate ads? Create a free account to hide them.
AllSides provides media bias ratings for over 800 sources and writers. Until 2021, we rated Wikipedia as Center, but changed them to Not Rated because the online encyclopedia does not fit neatly into AllSides’ media bias rating methodologies, which were developed specifically for news sites.

However, it’s worth exploring numerous studies and concerns that Wikipedia has a left-wing bias, including from Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger. Numerous studies that have found bias in Wikipedia relied on AllSides Media Bias Ratings™ for the analysis.

 

[markef]

Correct. AI is no more human than Wikipedia or CNN. AI is FAR LESS human than Wikipedia or CNN.

There was a water leak early in the morning. It is totally irrelevant.

Is CNN biased?

Is CNN BIASED TO THE LEFT.

Executive summary Independent media ratings and academic studies consistently place CNN left of center, especially in its online and cable programming, w...

factually.co

Executive summary

Independent media ratings and academic studies consistently place CNN left of center, especially in its online and cable programming, while many reliability assessments still deem its reporting generally factual; public opinion is split, with partisanship shaping whether viewers call that bias “liberal” or “unbiased”

The network’s bias is not monolithic: analyses differentiate between opinionated hosts and straight news reporting, and measurement methods matter to the result.

 

[markef]

That wasn't a politician, it was your news source.

Are you claiming politicians that lie about Trump can be trusted but other sources cannot?

 

[markef]

You need to climb out of your internet rabbit holes.

Here’s food for thought

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof

You seem to get that backwards

 

[markef]

You need to climb out of your internet rabbit holes.

Here’s food for thought

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof

You seem to get that backwards

Nobody has ever come close to proving no significant fraud occurred in the 2020 election.

 

[markef]

It must have been. Almost 6 years later, you still can't find proof of massive fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election.

6 years after the tainted 2020 election democrats are still fighting like the devil to prevent investigations into the allegations of fraud that could prove no fraud was committed if no fraud was committed.

 

[Lesh]

Nobody has ever come close to proving no significant fraud occurred in the 2020 election.

You don’t prove negatives

No one has come close to proving that there WAS significant fraud in the 2020 election
After looking for SIX years dummy

Give it up

 

[markef]

Remains unproven

Six years later

Dozens of court cases

Dozens of recounts

Numerous forensic investigations

Nada

No court compared immigration records against voting records to ascertain whether only a few many thousands of illegal immigrants voted. No court examined signatures to determine if signatures were faked on a significant number of ballots. No court verified that every vote counted was legitimately cast by a legitimate voter living at a legitimate address. No court allowed expert testimony either verifying voting machines were corrupted or not corrupted. Only dummies continue to suggest courts proved the 2020 election was not seriously flawed. No court proved anything.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The evidence of fraud is massive but remains neither proven nor disproven.

It's not proven because there's no evidence of it

 

[markef]

You don’t prove negatives

No one has come close to proving that there WAS significant fraud in the 2020 election
After looking for SIX years dummy

Give it up

No criminal be found guilty of a crime without an investigation into the existing evidence and no voting fraud can be proven until a responsible investigation into the existing evidence has been done. Democrats claim no significant fraud occurred yet continue to fight like the devil against investigations into the evidence of fraud. Democrats lie when they claim no significant fraud occurred since they have no investigative evidence to support that claim.

 

[markef]

It's not proven because there's no evidence of it

Only the willfully blind cannot see the massive evidence of 2020 fraud.

 

[Lesh]

No criminal be found guilty of a crime without an investigation into the existing evidence and no voting fraud can be proven until a responsible investigation into the existing evidence has been done. Democrats claim no significant fraud occurred yet continue to fight like the devil against investigations into the evidence of fraud. Democrats lie when they claim no significant fraud occurred since they have no investigative evidence to support that claim.

Investigation after investigation has shown nothing

Zero

Zip

That would have had any impact on the election

Give it up ya weirdo

 

[Political-Junkie]

There seems to be no reason apart from after election panic for why thousands of mimeographed ballots did not show up until after polls closed. However, I suspect delays in counting in democrat election wards had more to do with adjusting Dominion voting machine counts rather than paper ballot dumps.

You have no proof of that either. The leak shut everything down until it was repaired. And there's no evidence monitors were "shoo'd" away during that period.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Perhaps you are right. The miraculous jump in Biden numbers came overnight after the polls closed with the mysterious dumps of unverified ballots without the reequired security protections in so many democrat wards.

What mysterious dumps? There were none. What ballots missing security protections? There were none.

 

[markef]

Investigation after investigation has shown nothing

Zero

Zip

That would have had any impact on the election

Give it up ya weirdo

Can you post the findings of investigations of Dominion voting machines immediately after the election before possible crooks had time to delete the evidence of their crimes like Hillary deleted subpoenaed emails?



Judge freezes voting machines in 3 Georgia counties - POLITICO 11-30-20


Judge freezes voting machines in 3 Georgia counties

The suit is one of two cases filed in federal courts last week by Sidney Powell, an outspoken Texas attorney.



A Georgia Republican Party poll watcher looks over voting machine transporters being stored at the Fulton County Election Preparation Center on Nov. 4, 2020, in Atlanta. | Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

By JOSH GERSTEIN

11/30/2020 08:20 AM EST

Updated: 11/30/2020 04:15 PM EST
A judge assigned to a Republican-led lawsuit alleging widespread fraud in the presidential election in Georgia issued an order late Sunday night blocking plans to wipe or reset voting machines used in three counties in the state.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The evidence of 2020 fraud is widespread and involves democrat wards in several states.

Prove it. Oh? You said there is no proof never mind.

 

[markef]

You have no proof of that either. The leak shut everything down until it was repaired. And there's no evidence monitors were "shoo'd" away during that period.

Democrats found ways to prevent monitors from examining too closely what democrat election workers were doing at democrat election wards. Democrats quote Al Jazeera as proof democrats did not hinder republican poll watchers from closely monitoring what democrat precinct workers were doing.

GOP poll watchers not excluded from Michigan count: Witnesses

Michigan election official and Democratic poll watcher tell Al Jazeera Donald Trump campaign's claims are unfounded.

www.aljazeera.com

News|US Elections 2020

GOP poll watchers not excluded from Michigan count: Witnesses​

Michigan election official and Democratic poll watcher tell Al Jazeera Donald Trump campaign’s claims are unfounded.

 

[markef]

What mysterious dumps? There were none. What ballots missing security protections? There were none.

Observer Spots Mysterious Drop of 50+ Boxes Of Swing-State Ballots Overnight -- Here's What He Saw 11-15=20

Observer Spots Mysterious Drop of 50+ Boxes Of Swing-State Ballots Overnight — Here’s What He Saw

Written by Wes Walker on November 15, 2020

As of the close of voting on November 5th, no more votes were supposed to come in. That’s what the law said. So how do you explain this truck full of boxes?

Poll Challenger Shane Trejo was watching the polls on behalf of Team Trump. what he saw raised some serious red flags.

He describes a long time of inactivity where there were no votes being counted, but when the vote counters were just completing their shift, the mysterious truck came in.

What came in was a truck with 50+ boxes. Shane describes the truck, the three workers, the boxes, and someone in a blue hoodie who he had seen earlier in the night.

Toward the end of the shift they were unloaded, but weren’t immediately processed. To the best of his knowledge, nobody touched any of the boxes unloaded from that truck until much later, when it would have been a different group of workers, and there would have been no context given for the origin of these ballots.

He’s also referring to ways the workers have been hostile to poll watchers.

But that isn’t the only thing Trejo saw on election night.

He’s looking for answers, but he’s getting stonewalled.

“THERE WERE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS IN EACH BOX,” TREJO SAYS. “THERE WERE AT LEAST 50 BOXES THAT I SAW UNLOADED AT 3:30AM, WELL AFTER THE 8:00PM DEADLINE FOR BALLOTS TO SHOW UP.”​