So, you oppose tax dollars going to Unplanned Parenthood then, right? We shouldn’t pay for someone else’s choice, right?
(and don’t come back with the moronic “they keep tax dollars separate” bullshit)
Nope. You fail to comprehend my position.
I support my tax dollars going to education and Planned Parenthood for basic services such as public education, contraception, pre natal testing etc. But if you want to send your kid to Christian academy or pay for fertility treatments, that is on your dime.
So, you want others to pay for some choices, and not others.
How hypocritical of you.
Nope.
Are you going to pay for my kid to go to Harvard? Didn’t think so.
We are legally required to provide an education to thechildren in this country. We aren’t legally required to provide the education of your choice. That is on you and on your dime.
Vouchers go to kids in poor performing schools.....typically inner city schools with poor minorities.
You are the typical Libtard hellbent on keeping minorities down.
Typical ignorant Contard - time to move past outdated talking points.
The voucher program may have initially been to help poor students in struggling schools that is no longer the case:
the-promise-and-peril-of-school-vouchers
Fort Wayne is a microcosm of what's happening statewide, with tens of millions of state taxpayer dollars paying for children to attend private schools without, as then-Gov. Daniels had suggested, giving public schools "first shot."
Behning, the law's tireless defender, argues that all parents deserve to choose their child's school, even those who have traditionally opted out of the public system.
"The intent of the program was to give parents choice," says Behning. The parents of children in private schools, he says, "are taxpayers just like the parents in a traditional public school."
This shift in the program's rules, begun by Pence in 2013, has led to a shift in student demographics as well. White voucher students are up from 46 percent that first year to 60 percent today, and the share of black students has dropped from 24 percent to 12 percent. Recipients are also increasingly suburban and middle class. A third of students do not qualify for free or reduced-price meals.
While the program was once premised on giving low-income, public school families access to better schools, this year fewer than 1 percent of voucher students used a pathway, written into the law, that's meant specifically for students leaving failing schools.
"When you look at that trend data, it is alarming," says Jennifer McCormick, the state's new Republican superintendent of public instruction, and a former public school teacher. She says of the old narrative that vouchers were largely meant to help low-income students escape underperforming public schools: "That's not necessarily the case" today.
So why exactly are you demanding that I pay for suburban middle class parents (who's public school system is generally quite good) to send their kids to private schools?
You just want more free stuff paid for by others. (sarcasm alert)