Liberals love subsidies, liberals are beta , conservatives are alpha. Man you sure think you got people pegged. Ever take any psychology or sociology classes in a local college? You might have some fun arguing your world view with a professor with a phd. in either of those fields.
You know both sides get subsidies but for whatever reasons repubs or conservatives only focus on the poor. The Walmart heirs can get along just fine without subsidies. Not so for the needy and yes there is a certain amount of abuse and fraud but it's really minimal. Being a business owner in minority and low income neighborhoods on and off for decades I can tell you that there are many people that couldn't make it without some subsidies. Can't make it like they would have to live in cars or under bridges, some with children.
I only took introductory sociology and psychology classes in college. Why do you ask? Having graduated from a highly selective and ultra leftist liberal arts college with a BA in History, I had to hold my own against well published professors quite often so as to graduate with high honors (3.9 GPA). Indeed, I wrote many a paper and defended many a presentation against an overwhelmingly leftist college where both the students and professors weren't shy about praising the merits of socialism, social justice, and multiculturalism.
People who can't afford to feed their children should stop breeding. End of story. Yes, there are people who become poor after children but they are certainly in the minority. The lower your income the more likely you start crapping out children that you expect everyone else to pay for.
I was both raised in a black neighborhood and I went to a black school. Having parents that avoided welfare I had the cheapest cloths in the school while everyone else had $120 shoes, jackets, and jewelry. In this school 99% had free or reduced lunch. I was not among them. I was constantly ridiculed by poorer children for not having Jordan's or new cloths. Don't give me the stupid plight of the inner-city child argument. I've been there and I know its all a sham. The only people starving are the crack heads. The fraud and abuse is amazing! People who pretend to be preachers so they can put their cars and properties under the churches name for tax write-offs, people who don't get married or don't report the fathers of their children so as to get a larger welfare check, friends using daycare subsidies so as to watch children while claiming welfare and giving a percentage back to the parent, half the market is underground, food stamp fraud at the gas station, and the list goes on. I grew up in a neighborhood where the cars were nice, people had expensive cloths, and their houses looked like a train wreck. In a neighborhood where nearly everyone was on welfare, my family , having never accepted or qualified for welfare, looked poorest of all. We lived within our means!
at 1:38 He said my hero's methodology is flawed because Krugman fails to factor in the Banksters outright theft which is true. I still like Max though 
Arianna Huffington: Move Your Money: A New Year's Resolution
